12922 items matching your search terms
FREDRICK PRETORIUS v MARRA CONSTRUCTION (2004) LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 222 [11 December 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 222 EMPC 342/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file a challenge out of time BETWEEN MARRA CONSTRUCTION (2004) LIMITED Applicant AND FREDRICK PRETORIUS Respondent Hearing: (on the papers dated 12, 13 and 26 November 2015) Counsel: K Patterson, co...
...requested that Mr AB make an appointment to discuss further options. [19] Ms OC relayed the outcome of the application to Mr NS in correspondence dated 6 September 2013. She confirmed that after having discussed the matter with Mr BR, she had formed a view that an application should be made for a visa pursuant to s 61 of the Immigration Act 2009 (s 61 application). This application was to be based on an offer of employment that Mrs RJ had received. [20] On 16 September 2013, M...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 725 APPLICANT DN and EN RESPONDENT R Ltd The Tribunal orders: R Ltd is to pay DN and EN $3,220.00 within 28 days. R Ltd did not appear at the hearing. Reasons [1] DN and EN booked return flights from [City] to [Country 1] with R Ltd. They claim that R Ltd unjustifiably refused to allow them on the flight that was to leave [City], and
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 542 APPLICANT MN RESPONDENT QL The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by MN against QL is proved. 2. The counterclaim by QL against MN is dismissed. 3. QL is to pay MN the sum of $20,000.00 on or before 5:00 pm on 21 August 2024. Reasons 1. In April 2022 MN paid QL $13,000.00 in cash and $7,000.00 in a bank transfer. MN claims that he lo...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 45 APPLICANT EQ RESPONDENT MT Ltd The Tribunal orders: MT Ltd is to pay EQ the sum of $30,000.00 on or before 1 June 2022. Reasons: 1. In November 2021 EQ contracted to do earthworks at his property in [Town]. As part of the contract, fill taken from other sites would be delivered and used on the property. After the work...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 725 APPLICANT BI RESPONDENT O Inc The Tribunal orders: The claim by BI is dismissed. Reasons 1. BI was a member of the O Inc. From 2022, he became unhappy with the views and services being provided by O Inc. He began voicing these concerns. Ultimately, after a series of complaints and counter-complaints, BI was expelled from O Inc....
...NT SECOND APPLICANT OX RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay the sum of $1,822.67 to NT and OX on or before Tuesday, 23 May 2023. The balance of the claim is dismissed. REASONS 1. On 8 October 2022, the Applicants, NT and OX (together referred to as “the Applicants”), booked to fly with the Respondent, B Ltd, from [city 1] to [city 2] (via [city 3]) on 21 December 2022. B Ltd was operating the [city 1] to [city 3] leg, and X Ltd was operatin...
...Land Court Rules 2011 to review a decision of the Registrar made on 27 June 2018, to refuse to accept a Notice of Appeal in respect of MANGATAINOKA 1 BC NO 2B NO 3 Chief Judge Introduction 1. This is an application by Fredrick Hill (the applicant), in terms of rule 4.10(3) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 (the Rules), to review a decision of the Registrar who refused to accept a Notice of Appeal from him dated 20 June 2018. Background 2. The Notice of Appeal (A201...
...of Maori Customary land pursuant to sections 18, 131 and 132 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993. Initially, the application was brought for and on behalf of the whanau and beneficiaries of Whakatohea. Whakatohea and it's underlying HapO, it was claimed in the application, were tangata whenua in respect of the region where this land is situated beginning at Te Rangi in the east and ending at Te Horo in the west. The region includes within it, land referred to in the attached schedule t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 666 APPLICANT KT APPLICANT TL RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. F Ltd is to pay TL and KT the sum of $23,474.50 on or before 6 November 2023. 2. TL and KT are entitled to a refund of the $6,525.50 held in relation to this building contract, in the lawyers’ escrow account, on or before 6 November 2023. Reasons: 1.