Search Results

1. YM v DD Ltd [2024] NZDT 54 (26 January 2024) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

2. FH v TI Ltd [2023] NZDT 263 (29 May 2023) [pdf, 172 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 263 APPLICANT FH RESPONDENT TI Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The applicant’s name is changed to FH. 2. TI Ltd is to pay the sum of $2,975.00 to FH on or before Monday 19 June 2023. Reasons: 1. In June 2022, the [netball team] manager for FH, UN, booked accommodation for the team and coaches from 28 August to 2...

3. DG & J Ltd v BM [2024] NZDT 327 (23 April 2024) [pdf, 89 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 327 APPLICANT DG RESPONDENT BM APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: BM is to pay $4,224.10 to J Ltd on or before 12 May 2024. REASONS 1. On 28 October 2023 DG had attended the speedway in [Town]. Upon leaving, DG drove along the gravel road leading from the speedway track to the intersection...

4. Landon v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 12 [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...Council6 the Tribunal concluded that the bar for establishing that a claim was without substantial merit should not be set too high and that the Tribunal should have the ability to award costs against parties making allegations, or opposing removal applications, on the basis of allegations which a party ought reasonably to have known they could not establish. [5] The Act does not provide any guidance as to how the Tribunal should calculate any costs awarded when exercising its...

5. ABO and ABP v ZYP [2013] NZDT 65 (2 April 2013) [pdf, 72 KB]

   ...APPLICANT AND ABP SECOND APPLICANT AND ZYP RESPONDENT Date of Order: 2 April 2013 Referee: Referee Haronga ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Applicants’ claim is dismissed. Facts [1] ABO and ABP bought a second-hand washing machine from ZYP on Trade Me for $150 plus delivery fee of $40. One month later the machine stopped working. They asked ZYP to either replace or re...

6. AI v ZR Ltd [2014] NZDT 610 (7 August 2014) [pdf, 19 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 610 BETWEEN AI APPLICANT AND ZR Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 7 August 2014 Referee: Referee Blyth ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] On 8 October 2013 the Police seized and impounded a car driven by the applicant’s son (AA). The Police issued a “Vehicle seizure and impoundment notice” (the notice) which stated the “Driver’s full...

7. Maxwell - Pakanae 2AA2 (2005) 102 Whangārei MB 94 (102 WH 94) [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   Place: Present: Date: Panul No: Subject: Legislation: Applicant: Gisborne, Judges Chambers C L Wickliffe, Judge K W Lardelli, Clerk of the Court 16 June 2005 Minute Book: 102 WH 94 Chambers Application No: A 19990004018 Pakanae 2AA2 Sections 164 and 328, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 Leonie Maxwell RESERVED DECISION OF JUDGE C L WICKLIFFE Introduction Pakanae 2AA2 is a block of Maori freehold land siluated in the Maori Land Court district of the Taitokerau....

8. KM v NT [2024] NZDT 218 (5 March 2024) [pdf, 84 KB]

   Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 218 APPLICANT KM RESPONDENT NT OTHER PARTY S Ltd Result of application for rehearing: Rehearing Refused The Order of 17 August 2023 stands. Reasons for decision: 1. KM brought a claim in the Disputes Tribunal against NT and S Ltd. 2. On 17 August 2023 I dismissed KM’s claim as he did not attend the face to face hearing to present hi...

9. FP v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 635 (17 November 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 635 APPLICANT FP RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd is to pay FP $4,132.00 on or before 6 December 2023. Reasons Introduction 1. In November 2022 T Ltd prepared and laid lawn seed at FP’s house. 2. FP claims $4,132.00 being the price paid for the preparation and laying of the lawn. 3. The issues to be resolved are:...

10. [2020] NZIACDT 39 - IK v Tian (23 September 2020) [pdf, 213 KB]

    ...New Zealand and had to leave, otherwise he was liable for deportation. [13] As Ms Tian did not inform the complainant of the outcome of the application or its immigration consequences, he continued to text or telephone her seeking news of the applications. She continued her practice of claiming not to know. [14] The complainant engaged his present counsel, Ms Mitchell, in January 2019. She contacted Immigration New Zealand and was informed of the decline of the complainant’s v...