Search Results

1. Singh v McKee [2024] NZHRRT 3 [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...by Mr McKee’s late father and from 2017 was owned by Mr McKee. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Singh v McKee [2024] NZHRRT 3.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 3 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] Mr Singh claims that during his employment, Mr McKee subjected him to racial harassment in breach of s 63 of the Human Rights Act 1993 (HRA) as he commented on and made fun of his Indian accent, made belittling remarks about Indians and objected to hi...

2. Darby Trust v Auckland Council & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 1 [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...framing below. [40] The parapet is not constructed as shown on the consented plans. Those plans showed the parapet being clad on sides and top with solid plaster on wire mesh. The top has a five degree back slope and the feature band is formed as part of the solid plaster cladding. [41] Metal cap flashings were installed to these surfaces, I assume in response to concerns about water entry. They are not shown on the consented plans, although were noted by the Council...

3. Te Awe Awe v Te Awe Awe-Bevan - Pt Rangitikei Manawatu Pt B4 (2016) 354 Aotea MB 213 (354 AOT 213) [pdf, 301 KB]

   ...Manawatu B4A Reservation and Rangitikei-Manawatu B4 Part (Rangiotu School) Reservation seek the removal of Brigitte Te Awe Awe-Bevan as a trustee. They say that she has not attended trustee meetings for two years, has failed to comply with trustee requests for information, has displayed a lack of cooperation and participation and has failed to perform her role as secretary and treasurer in a satisfactory manner. [2] Ms Te Awe Awe-Bevan denies the allegations. She says that she has...

4. [2012] NZEmpC 187 Kilgour v Queens High School Board of Trustees [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...NZEI until January 2009. [6] At the time of the review Mr Kilgour did not turn his mind to what conditions governed his employment. He said in his evidence during the Authority investigation meeting that because of the nature of the role he performed he did not have breaks with other staff and, on reflection, he could see that he was out of the loop on many staff-related issues. [7] Mr Kilgour's last known employment agreement at the time of the review of his hours was an in...

5. LCRO 246/2016 AS v NL (25 June 2019) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...[5] Ms NL practises as a barrister. [6] In July 2014, Ms AS instructed Ms NL to act for her to obtain a temporary protection order against Ms AS’s former partner. [7] On 13 July 2014, Ms AS paid $2,000 directly into Ms NL’s bank account, as requested by Ms NL. [8] On 17 July 2014, the Family Court granted Ms AS’s application for a temporary protection order.1 [9] On 3 October 2014, as requested by Ms NL, Ms AS made another payment directly into Ms NL’s bank account of $2...

6. DN v SC [2024] NZDT 202 (19 March 2024) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...first size shoe requested by her. She accepts the shop assistant did not put on the second size shoe for DN but says she asked DN questions about the fit of the shoe. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 5 5. The shoes in question are a pair of formal heeled shoes. They simply slip onto the foot with no fastenings. In these circumstances, there is really no fitting service required from a shop. I find that it is immaterial whether DN had to put the shoe on herself rather than it being...

7. Fitikefu v Department of Corrections (Strike-Out Application) [2019] NZHRRT 51 [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...[1] Mr Fitikefu complains that the Department of Corrections (Corrections) breached his privacy when it disclosed an assessment report about him to a service provider called Early Start. Early Start was at that time working with Mr Fitikefu’s former partner and baby daughter. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Fitikefu v Department of Corrections (Strike-Out Application) [2019] NZHRRT 51.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2019] NZ

8. [2020] NZREADT 02 - Clough v CAC 520, Bunn & Christiansen - Penalty (5 February 2020) [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...the market. The listing agreement with the Agency was cancelled. [5] Mr and Mrs Clough were subsequently engaged in relationship property proceedings. The Tribunal’s finding related to a letter dated 8 June 2013, written at Mrs Clough’s request, signed by Ms Linley, and produced by Mrs Clough at a Family Court hearing. This letter was addressed “To Whom It May Concern”, and recorded that the Agency had marketed the property in July and August 2011, during which...

9. MI v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 102 (10 March 2023) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...order, MI may apply to the Tribunal for enforcement of a work order and should supply a quotation for the amount it would cost him to freight the goods back to T Ltd. Referee Perfect Date: 10 March 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

10. KU v KG Ltd [2023] NZDT 18 (27 January 2023) [pdf, 195 KB]

    ...failing to provide what it agreed to. 9. The loss KU incurred was the cost of the voucher which was for $2,500. An order is therefore made for that amount. Referee: K Cowie DTR Date: 27 January 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...