12922 items matching your search terms
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2025] NZLCRO 021 Ref: LCRO 13/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN DG Applicant AND PS Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr DG has applied...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1651 APPLICANT FI RESPONDENT CI The Tribunal orders: CI is to pay FI $4,110.90 by 4pm on 29 November 2021. Reasons: 1. In August 2020, FI was walking her dog Freddie when there was an altercation with CI’s dog Chase. FI claims that as a result of Chase attacking Freddie, Freddie has required two surgeries...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 432 APPLICANT XD RESPONDENT G Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. XD purchased a new G Ltd campervan in [Overseas Country] from [Caravan Company] and imported it into New Zealand. Prior to importing the campervan, XD asked G Ltd [Overseas Country] about the warranty that came with the...
...be determined are: a. Who is the correct respondent? b. Whether the tub is of acceptable quality/fit for purpose. c. What remedy is available to HM. 3. An applicant (in this case HM) in the Tribunal must establish the elements of his claim to the required standard to be successful. That standard is the balance of probabilities (based on the evidence before the Tribunal) which means what is more likely than not. Who is the correct respondent? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order...
IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-0039-2020 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN C W Applicant AND EARTHQUAKE COMMISSION Respondent Date: 18 March 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF C P SOMERVILLE [JURISDICTION] ____________________________________________________________...
...REPRESENTATION: Mr C J Tennet for plaintiff Mr D P Neild and Ms V N Rea for defendants DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 18 September 2023 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 [1] Ms Morunga filed her statement of claim in the Tribunal on 19 March 2020. Ms Morunga alleges that the Department of Corrections (Corrections) interfered with her privacy by not responding to her request for personal information within the required timeframe under the Privacy...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 380 APPLICANT LQ RESPONDENT NE The Tribunal orders: NE is ordered to pay LQ the sum of $3,200.00. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 19 July 2023. Reasons: 1) In December 2022 the applicant enrolled her dog in a training programme offered by the respondent to dog ow...
...Regulations 2002 provides that a defendant who intends to defend proceedings must, within 30 days after the day on which the notice of proceedings is served on him or her, file in the office of the Tribunal a statement of reply to the plaintiff’s claim and must serve a copy of the statement of reply on the plaintiff and any other party. [2] By memorandum dated 19 April 2017 the Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections has sought an extension of time for filing his statement of...
...Regulations 2002 provides that a defendant who intends to defend proceedings must, within 30 days after the day on which the notice of proceedings is served on him or her, file in the office of the Tribunal a statement of reply to the plaintiff’s claim and must serve a copy of the statement of reply on the plaintiff and any other party. [2] By memorandum dated 12 April 2017 the Ministry of Social Development has sought an extension of time for filing its statement of reply until 12 Ma...
...Reuvecamp for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 5 September 2018 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE STATEMENT OF REPLY OUT OF TIME1 Background [1] Upon the filing of the statement of claim on 23 July 2018 the Secretariat on 24 July 2018 sent to IDEA Services Ltd (IDEA Services) a copy of the statement of claim 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (Exten...