12542 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 780 APPLICANT IN RESPONDENT XI APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) X Ltd The Tribunal orders: XI to pay X Ltd $3,962.44 by 10 February 2024. Reasons: 1. IN claims that on the 21 January 2023 XI was driving a vehicle [registration number] which collided with the rear of her vehicle twice as she was slowing down for traf...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 39 APPLICANT NJ APPLICANT SE RESPONDENT KN SECOND RESPONDENT EN The Tribunal orders: The claim and counterclaim are dismissed. Reasons: 1. NJ and SE own the property at [Address 1]. Their neighbours, KN and EN, own [Address 2]. These properties are two of four that are accessed via a shared driveway. Th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 198 APPLICANT FB RESPONDENT EE RESPONDENT YT The Tribunal orders: EE is to pay $916.36 to FB on or before Monday 22 May 2023. Reasons: 1. FB purchased a property from EE and took possession on 5 November 2021. After possession she discovered that all the elements on the ceramic stovetop could only operate on ful...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 21 APPLICANT FM RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. FM purchased some earbuds from T Ltd. After approximately 6 months the right earbud lost volume, so FM took them back to T Ltd. He was told there was detritus in the right earbud and given a cleaning guide, but found that cleani...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 123 APPLICANT CF RESPONDENT XQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: XQ Ltd is to pay the sum of $1,239.65 to CF on or before Friday 31 March 2023. Reasons: 1. On 14 September 2022, CF purchased a [computer] via [online platform] and paid $1,220.00 by bank transfer to an account in the name of XQ Ltd. He was promised that a shipping...
...apply merits and justice when reaching a decision and having done so I find the full rental cost should be paid. 4. For this reason I allow the claim. Referee: P McKinstry Date: 19 June 2024 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 429 APPLICANT TD Ltd RESPONDENT W Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. TD Ltd purchased flooring product from W Ltd which they installed in 10 tiny homes they built for customers. As the flooring product was being re-supplied in trade, the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 does not apply to the purchase. 2. T...
...gastroscopy. [12] The General Practitioner notes from Dee Street Medical Centre Limited recorded consultations of Ms Brunton on 21 August 2020, 9 October 2020, 14 and 22 December 2020 and 26 January 2021. 5 [13] The original accident compensation claim form was completed and submitted to the Corporation on Ms Brunton’s behalf on 23 December 2020 by Dr John Aiken. Cover was sought for “complications/medical surgical care”, in the context of an “unusual reaction followi...
...plaintiffs P Wicks QC, counsel for defendant Judgment: 17 August 2015 ORAL INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 3) OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN [1] The plaintiffs have applied for leave to file and serve a second amended statement of claim in circumstances where the proceeding has been set down for hearing and is scheduled to commence a little less than two months hence. The defendant opposes the application for leave. [2] The proceeding was filed urgently on 9 June 2015....
...James Taueki, Vivienne Therese Taueki, Sheryl Waho Stanford, Edward Karaitiana, Peggy Anne Gamble and Kay Kahumaori Pene DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL ON AN APPLICATION FOR URGENCY Introduction 1. On 28 November 2013, a statement of claim and an application for an urgent hearing was filed by William James Taueki, Vivienne Therese Taueki, Sheryl Waho Stanford, Edward Karaitiana, Peggy Anne Gamble and Kay Kahumaori.1 The claim and the application concerns the Crown’s rec...