Search Results

1. TM & YM v K Ltd [2024] NZDT 608 (6 June 2024) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 608 APPLICANT TM APPLICANT YM RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. K Ltd are to pay $15,000.00 to TM and YM. Reasons 1. The applicants purchased a kitchen from the respondent pursuant to a contract dated 17th January 2023. The kitchen was installed in April 2023. 2. The applicants claim that the respondent described the kitchen as being as solid wood but that they...

2. JC v GCQ Inc [2020] NZDT 1318 (20 November 2020) [pdf, 197 KB]

   (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1318 APPLICANT JC and QN As Trustees of the JCT Trust RESPONDENT GCQ Incorporated The Tribunal orders: 1. GCQ Incorporated is to pay JC and QN (as trustees of the JCT Trust) $2,129.43 by Wednesday 16 December 2020. Reasons 2. The claim relates to what is a fair reduction for rent during the Level 4 lockdown. 3. The JCT Trust (Trust)

3. L Ltd v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 86 (22 February 2024) [pdf, 139 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 86 APPLICANT L Ltd RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. L Ltd runs a grocery shop as a member of the TW franchise group. B Ltd provides merchant card services to L Ltd, which allows L Ltd’s customers to pay for goods with credit cards and so forth. L Ltd runs a “click and collect” onlin...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 163 Bay of Plenty DHB v Cliff [pdf, 74 KB]

   BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD v DEBORAH CLIFF NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 163 [18 September 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 163 EMPC 179/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file a cross- challenge out of time BETWEEN BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Applicant AND DEBORAH CLIFF Respondent Hearing: On the papers received on 25 August and 15 September 2015 Appearances: M Be...

5. KU v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 778 (11 September 2023) [pdf, 96 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 778 APPLICANT KU RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. N Ltd is to pay the sum of $17,975.06 to KU on or before Monday 25 September 2023. 2. Once payment has been made, KU is to return the vehicle to N Ltd. Reasons: 1. On 16 December 2022, KU (the consumer) purchased a [car] from N Ltd, trading as IT (the supplier),...

6. CT v DF Ltd [2024] NZDT 167 (25 March 2024) [pdf, 181 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 167 APPLICANT CT RESPONDENT DF Ltd t/a ID The Tribunal orders: DF Ltd t/a ID is to pay to CT $1,042.34 on or before 5:00pm on Friday 17 May 2024. Reasons 1. On 17 August 2021, CT bought a Hybrid battery from DF Ltd t/a ID for $2,651.20. The battery came with a 2 year/60,000km warranty. On or around 22 January 2023, CT reporte...

7. BG v KN [2024] NZDT 691 (4 November 2024) [pdf, 136 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 691 APPLICANT BG RESPONDENT KN The Tribunal orders: The claim by BG is dismissed. Reasons 1. The hearing was held at 2pm on 4 November 2024. BG left the hearing at 3.13pm because she had not taken time off work for the hearing. In accordance with section 42(1) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988, the hearing continued in her absenc...

8. TN v KM [2024] NZDT 696 (29 November 2024) [pdf, 187 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 696 APPLICANT TN RESPONDENT KM The Tribunal orders: KM is to pay TN the sum of $1,597.50 on or before 15 January 2025. Reasons 1. The parties were friends. KM lived as a boarder in TN’s house for a period of a couple of years (the exact length of time is in dispute). KM was required to move out of the house after signifi...

9. TN v HD [2023] NZDT 468 (16 August 2023) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...Cadastral Survey Act 2002. The Disputes Tribunal has no jurisdiction under that Act. Outcome 23. The claim and counter-claim are dismissed. Referee: Nicholas Blake Date: 16 August 2023 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

10. TU v EN & C Ltd [2024] NZDT 479 (28 May 2024) [pdf, 108 KB]

    Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 479 APPLICANT TU FIRST RESPONDENT SECOND RESPONDENT EN C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim against EN in relation to the retaining wall is dismissed. (The claim in relation to the ensuite has been settled via payment by C Ltd of $5703.53 on 14 May 2024). Reasons 1. TU engaged NI Ltd trading as NQ (removed from the Companies...