Search Results

1. BU v SI Ltd [2015] NZDT 1460 (10 September 2015) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...in this claim were innocent victims, and I note that the Land Rover only had third party insurance, so SI Ltd has had to bear the loss of its own vehicle. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 10 September 2015 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to apply...

2. NP v KM 2 [2023] NZDT 340 (20 June 2023) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...saddle (as set out in paragraph 19 below). Background 1. The adjournment order dated 8 March 2023 sets out the background to the dispute. 2. Pursuant to that order, NP returned the saddle to KM, and KM had it assessed by BN. 3. KM informed the Tribunal that, on the basis of BN’s findings, she did not agree to refund the purchase price to NP. A second hearing took place by phone on 2 June 2023. Findings 4. It is not disputed that KM’s Facebook Marketplace listi...

3. NM v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 512 (25 October 2023) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...breaches of the FTA or the CGA, or for that matter the terms and conditions of the contract between NM and the company, the claim is therefore dismissed. Referee: M Wilson Date: 25 October 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

4. NN v SG Ltd [2024] NZDT 111 (13 February 2024) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...Ltd is to pay NN $4,643.99 on or before 6 March 2024. 2. The remainder of the claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. In early October 2023, NN’s [ute] (‘the ute’) was taken to SG Ltd with a suspected blown head cylinder. NN was informed the repair would cost approximately $1,500.00 for the head cylinder plus two days labour. The total quote for the job was in or around $3,000.00. Repairs were carried out and when NN went to collect the ute, he was charged $8,668.99 for th...

5. ST v OL [2025] NZDT 68 (11 March 2025) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...any vehicle not changing lanes or not making a turn. This rule applies where a driver is moving from being parked on the side of the road into a driving lane on the road. This would include a driver who is conducting a U-turn. 10. The claim information filed by the insurer says that ST said she was parking on the side of the road when she was reversed into by OL. This is also what is stated in the claim form filed with the Tribunal. This is not consistent with the diagram of the acci...

6. LCRO 153/2022 YA v CK (16 July 2024) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...the LCRO is neither a judicial review nor an appeal. Those seeking a review of a Committee determination are entitled to a review based on the LCRO’s own opinion rather than on deference to the view of the Committee. A review by the LCRO is informal, inquisitorial and robust. It involves the LCRO 1 Deliu v Connell [2016] NZHC 361, [2016] NZAR 475 at [2]. 2 coming to his or her own view of the fairness of the substance and process of a Committee’s determination. [4] In rea...

7. JM v DTM [2011] NZIACDT 1 (19 January 2011) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...also for the purposes of this decision. [14] I have considered the response in full. [15] Key aspects of the response to the minute presented by SN were that SN is said to have been a “Non-Advising Principal”. Further: [15.1] SNJ had not requested payment of $4,837.50, only $2,868.75. The calculation of $4,837.50 was for the purposes of illustration only. The fee was reasonable, including on a comparative basis. [15.2] The Complainant falsely stated that the work was pro bono,...

8. Waitangi Tribunal - Ngāti Kahu Remedies Report [pdf, 5.3 MB]

   T H E N G Ā T I K A H U R E M E D I E S R E P O R T Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t h e N g ā t i K a h u R e m e d i e s R e p o r t W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 3 W A I 4 5 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.gov

9. BORA Ngati Awa Claim Settlement Bill [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...the Bill of Rights. Section 14 BORA issue 12. Clause 21 of the Bill raises the issue of compliance with s 14 of the Bill of Rights. Section 14 protects the right to "freedom of expression, including the freedom to seek, receive and impart information and opinions of any kind in any form". 13. Clause 21 provides for protocols to be issued in the form set out in the deed of settlement. One of those protocols, the DOC Protocol, set out in Schedule 5.21 of the deed, raises fre...

10. [2017] NZEmpC 129 Phoenix Publishing Ltd v McCallum [pdf, 111 KB]

    ...had been given by the Authority in preparation for the investigation meeting. [6] In view of the fact that if leave is granted to Phoenix Publishing Ltd it will be seeking a hearing de novo of the entire matter, a good faith faith report was requested from the Authority pursuant to s 181 of the Act. That good faith report was prepared and delivered to the Court on 19 September 2017. The findings of the Authority were that Phoenix Publishing Ltd significantly obstructed the Authori...