Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal Bibliography Part 1 [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...information and insight into Crown-Maori relations from 1840 to the present day. This version of the bibliography is complete until the end of 2011. As we finish our large district historical inquiries and move our focus to contemporary and kaupapa claims it will continue to be updated to include further reports and evidence produced as part of our ongoing inquiry programme. Official Tribunal reports can already be viewed on our website soon after they are released. It is intended that...

2. [2018] NZEmpC 111 Hines v Eastland Port Ltd [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...111 [25 September 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 111 EMPC 14/2018 EMPC 47/2018 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN PAUL HINES Plaintiff AND EASTLAND PORT LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: P McBride, counsel for plaintiff E J Brown, counsel for defendant Judgmen...

3. Linney v Hart [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...Measures to prevent water accretion have not been detailed on the plans and specifications (Appendices, p34). To prevent water ingress into the dwelling from the sub floor space, a concrete beam or ‘nib’ as detailed on plans has not been formed (Appendices, p22). Bedroom Four 5.1.4 At the south elevation retaining wall, the water proofing tanking is inadequate and the concrete is pourous. Moisture is diffusing through the new concrete retaining wall of Bedroom 4....

4. EI v TB [2020] NZDT 401 (19 March 2020) [pdf, 130 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 401 APPLICANT EI RESPONDENT TB SECOND RESPONDENT QJ Limited APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: TB is to pay $2,563.74 to B Ltd by 5.00pm on 31 March 2020. TB’s counter claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] EI was in the process of exiting a side road an...

5. EI v TB [2020] NZDT 1699 (19 March 2020) [pdf, 189 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1699 APPLICANT EI RESPONDENT TB SECOND RESPONDENT QJ Limited APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: TB is to pay $2,563.74 to B Ltd by 5.00pm on 31 March 2020. TB’s counter claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] EI was in the process of exiting a side road a...

6. TG v AM & PD Ltd [2023] NZDT 368 (24 July 2023) [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...short of another collision in front of him. TN was driving [car 2] and AM, an employee of PD Ltd was driving [car 3]. The second and third cars collided with the third car shunting the second car into the first car. 2. TG and its insurer BJ Ltd claimed $2,975.95 for insured losses for his car which was written off, from TN, PD Ltd and AM. However at the hearing, the claim against TN was withdrawn. 3. TN and its insurer BJ Ltd counter claimed $25,597.26 comprising $25,084.48 for r...

7. TD Ltd v SC Ltd [2023] NZDT 624 (21 November 2023) [pdf, 195 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 7 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 624 APPLICANT TD Limited RESPONDENT SC Limited The Tribunal orders, on the claim and counter-claim: SC Ltd is to pay $9557.92 to TD Ltd on or before 19 December 2023. Reasons 1. SC Ltd contracted TD Ltd to build a 50sqm deck at a coastal property where SC Ltd was doing extensive renovation work for the homeowners. SC Ltd had...

8. AJ v ZQ Ltd [2014] NZDT 628 (18 July 2014) [pdf, 26 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 628 BETWEEN AJ APPLICANT AND ZQ Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 18 July 2014 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is hereby dismissed. Facts [1] Following a routine eye examination in January 2008, AJ (the applicant) was referred to an eye specialist to be tested for suspected ocular hypertension. The testing at the eye specialist...

9. CG v SG [2019] NZDT 1488 (2 April 2019) [pdf, 179 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1488 APPLICANT CS APPLICANT DS RESPONDENT SG The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. SG is to pay CS and DS the sum of $690.00 on or before 23 April 2019. 2. SG is to collect the splashback from CS and DS at his own expense on or before 23 April 2019. 3. SG is to give CS and DS 48 hours notice of the collection. Reasons

10. DE v UC Ltd [2024] NZDT 203 (17 January 2024) [pdf, 96 KB]

    ...Section 42 of the Disputes Tribunal Act provides that where the case of any party is not presented to the Tribunal after a reasonable opportunity has been given to that party to do so, the matter may be resolved by the Tribunal on such evidence or information as is before it. 2. In July 2022, DE visited UC Ltd and was seen by KH, the director of UC Ltd. DE says he was informed at the consultation that he needed five dental implants and two extractions. A plan was made to carry ou...