Search Results

1. E and E v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2019] CEIT-2019-0013 [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...___________________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF C P SOMERVILLE DATED 18 December 2019 ___________________________________________________________________________ Case stated [1] The respondent (IAG) has filed an application for referral of a question of law. That application, which took the form of a memorandum of counsel, outlined the question of law for which it sought referral and attached a draft case stated. The application was...

2. BC v J Ltd & M Insurance [2023] NZDT 513 (30 September 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 513 APPLICANT BC RESPONDENT J Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT M Insurance The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. BC’s home is situated on [City]’s peninsula, and part of his home is described as a boatshed with a slipway. The slipway was damaged in a storm and in July 2022 BC lodged a damage...

3. SC v QS [2022] NZDT 68 (3 May 2022) [pdf, 485 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 68 APPLICANT SC RESPONDENT QS The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. SC saw a car advertised for sale on Trade Me. The owner of the vehicle was DC. DC was moving overseas and so her friend, QS, completed the transaction for her. QS owns Q Automotive, and the car was located near the workshop...

4. Maruera v Te Runanga o Ngāti Maru (Taranaki) Trust (2017) 378 Aotea MB 118 (378 AOT 118) [pdf, 389 KB]

   ...Ngāti Maru (Taranaki) Trust from entering an Agreement in Principle (AIP) to settle the Ngāti Maru historical claims with the Crown in Wellington, tomorrow at 3.00pm. Mr Maruera, by his counsel, argues two principal grounds in support of his application: (a) the trustees of the Rūnanga are not competent to represent the interests of the Ngāti Maru tribe of Taranaki and to sign the AIP, due, in part, to what is an improper cloaking by this Court of the Rūnanga with a mandate...

5. [2020] NZEmpC 67 Maddigan v Director-General of Conservation [pdf, 312 KB]

   ...NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 67 EMPC 349/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN FRASER MADDIGAN Plaintiff AND DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Plaintiff in person K Radich, counsel for defendant...

6. Taylor v Corrections [2018] NZHRRT 35 [pdf, 308 KB]

   ...Corrections’ approach to responding to Privacy Act requests [64] The response to Mr Taylor’s request in the present case [69] Mr Arbuckle – credibility assessment and findings [71] THE REDACTION COMPLAINT – DISCUSSION [75] PERSONAL INFORMATION [78] Interpretation – text, purpose and context [78] About [83] Other interests to be balanced [86] Open texture [91] Context [92] Judicial interpretation of personal information – senior courts [106] Judicial interpretat...

7. [2012] NZEmpC 142 Horton Media Ltd [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...TITHER NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 142 [23 August 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 142 ARC 44/12 IN THE MATTER OF an application to vary a freezing order and ancillary orders BETWEEN HORTON MEDIA LIMITED Applicant AND NORAH LAURENCE TITHER Respondent Hearing: 23 August 2012 (by telephone) and by memoranda filed on 22 August 2012 Counsel: Stephen Langton, counsel for applicant Charlotte Parkhill, counsel for respondent...

8. LCRO 125/2023 TR v HJ (28 November 2023) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...[2023] NZLCRO 144 Ref: LCRO 125/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN TR Applicant AND HJ Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] The applicant has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Commit...

9. [2014] NZEmpC 103 Hill v Teck Properties Ltd costs [pdf, 68 KB]

   ...for plaintiff E Shattock, agent for the defedant Judgment: 20 June 2014 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [1] The plaintiff seeks an order of costs against the defendant. The costs sought are associated with an application for orders in respect of an earlier compliance order made by the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority). 1 The proceeding was set down for hearing but was subsequently vacated. [2] While the substantive proceeding has e...

10. LB & TB v BU Ltd [2024] NZDT 612 (29 August 2024) [pdf, 105 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 612 APPLICANT LB APPLICANT TB RESPONDENT BU Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. The Applicants purchased a kitset cabin to be installed on their property. The Applicants state that the cabin is not sealed sufficiently to be weather tight and seek and order for compensation on the basis that the ca...