Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12870 items matching your search terms

  1. [2020] NZEmpC 67 Maddigan v Director-General of Conservation [pdf, 312 KB]

    ...NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 67 EMPC 349/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN FRASER MADDIGAN Plaintiff AND DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Plaintiff in person K Radich, counsel for defendant...

  2. [2012] NZEmpC 142 Horton Media Ltd [pdf, 85 KB]

    ...TITHER NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 142 [23 August 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 142 ARC 44/12 IN THE MATTER OF an application to vary a freezing order and ancillary orders BETWEEN HORTON MEDIA LIMITED Applicant AND NORAH LAURENCE TITHER Respondent Hearing: 23 August 2012 (by telephone) and by memoranda filed on 22 August 2012 Counsel: Stephen Langton, counsel for applicant Charlotte Parkhill, counsel for respondent...

  3. LCRO 125/2023 TR v HJ (28 November 2023) [pdf, 265 KB]

    ...[2023] NZLCRO 144 Ref: LCRO 125/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN TR Applicant AND HJ Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] The applicant has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Commit...

  4. Maruera v Te Runanga o Ngāti Maru (Taranaki) Trust (2017) 378 Aotea MB 118 (378 AOT 118) [pdf, 389 KB]

    ...Ngāti Maru (Taranaki) Trust from entering an Agreement in Principle (AIP) to settle the Ngāti Maru historical claims with the Crown in Wellington, tomorrow at 3.00pm. Mr Maruera, by his counsel, argues two principal grounds in support of his application: (a) the trustees of the Rūnanga are not competent to represent the interests of the Ngāti Maru tribe of Taranaki and to sign the AIP, due, in part, to what is an improper cloaking by this Court of the Rūnanga with a mandate...

  5. TF v NX Ltd & TQ [2023] NZDT 760 (27 November 2023) [pdf, 104 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 760 APPLICANT TF 1st RESPONDENT 2nd RESPONDENT (joined) NX Ltd TQ The Tribunal orders: TQ shall pay TF $2,000.00 by 19 December 2023. Reasons: 1. TF paid $2,000.00 to NX Ltd on 27 October 2022 for an outboard motor. 2. TQ is the sole director of NX Ltd. TQ advised TF that there was a motor available if TF pa...

  6. WO v BN and ors [2024] NZDT 433 (13 June 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

    ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

  7. LB & TB v BU Ltd [2024] NZDT 612 (29 August 2024) [pdf, 105 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 612 APPLICANT LB APPLICANT TB RESPONDENT BU Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. The Applicants purchased a kitset cabin to be installed on their property. The Applicants state that the cabin is not sealed sufficiently to be weather tight and seek and order for compensation on the basis that the ca...

  8. [2014] NZEmpC 103 Hill v Teck Properties Ltd costs [pdf, 68 KB]

    ...for plaintiff E Shattock, agent for the defedant Judgment: 20 June 2014 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [1] The plaintiff seeks an order of costs against the defendant. The costs sought are associated with an application for orders in respect of an earlier compliance order made by the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority). 1 The proceeding was set down for hearing but was subsequently vacated. [2] While the substantive proceeding has e...

  9. B Ltd v IX [2019] NZDT 1392 (6 September 2019) [pdf, 213 KB]

    ...prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehe...

  10. UN Ltd v MI [2023] NZDT 205 (13 April 2023) [pdf, 138 KB]

    (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 205 APPLICANT UN Ltd RESPONDENT MI The Tribunal orders: MI is to pay $3130.56 to UN Ltd on or before 11 May 2023. Reasons 1. UN Ltd (‘UN’) provided an estimate to MI for the building work associated with a kitchen renovation at her house. MI had engaged a kitchen designer separately who had been contracted to design, supply and install the kitchen. 2.