Search Results

1. [2014] NZEmpC 103 Hill v Teck Properties Ltd costs [pdf, 68 KB]

   ...for plaintiff E Shattock, agent for the defedant Judgment: 20 June 2014 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [1] The plaintiff seeks an order of costs against the defendant. The costs sought are associated with an application for orders in respect of an earlier compliance order made by the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority). 1 The proceeding was set down for hearing but was subsequently vacated. [2] While the substantive proceeding has e...

2. LB & TB v BU Ltd [2024] NZDT 612 (29 August 2024) [pdf, 105 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 612 APPLICANT LB APPLICANT TB RESPONDENT BU Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. The Applicants purchased a kitset cabin to be installed on their property. The Applicants state that the cabin is not sealed sufficiently to be weather tight and seek and order for compensation on the basis that the ca...

3. B Ltd v IX [2019] NZDT 1392 (6 September 2019) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehe...

4. UN Ltd v MI [2023] NZDT 205 (13 April 2023) [pdf, 138 KB]

   (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 205 APPLICANT UN Ltd RESPONDENT MI The Tribunal orders: MI is to pay $3130.56 to UN Ltd on or before 11 May 2023. Reasons 1. UN Ltd (‘UN’) provided an estimate to MI for the building work associated with a kitchen renovation at her house. MI had engaged a kitchen designer separately who had been contracted to design, supply and install the kitchen. 2.

5. BT v US [2023] NZDT 112 (11 May 2023) [pdf, 111 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 112 APPLICANT in claim, Respondent in counterclaim BT RESPONDENT in claim, Applicant in counterclaim US The Tribunal orders: 1. US is to pay $1,500.00 to BT before 11 June 2023. 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons 1. BT engaged US to provide food platters, some drinks, and bar services at an agreed price of $2...

6. CK & QK v XL [2024] NZDT 265 (25 January 2024) [pdf, 177 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 265 APPLICANT CK and QK RESPONDENT XL The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 21 December 2022, QK was driving North on [highway] between [village 1] and [village 2] when she lost control of the vehicle and crashed into the bushes on the side of the road, causing damage to her vehicle. The accident occurred on...

7. LL v XX [2023] NZDT 219 (17 May 2023) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...after the work was done. He complained about them some months later when a dispute arose about payment. 11. I have therefore also dismissed XX’s counterclaim. Referee: T Prowse Date: 17 May 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

8. IN & MG v NF Ltd [2022] NZDT 52 (16 May 2022) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...APPLICANT IN APPLICANT MG RESPONDENT NF Ltd The Tribunal orders: NF Ltd is to pay the sum of $6,900.00 to IN and MG on or before Monday 6 June 2022. Reasons: 1. In May 2020, after the first Covid-19 lockdown, the applicants IN and her (now) daughter-in-law MG made a wedding booking with NF Ltd (the venue) for 27 November 2021. There were to be 150 guests, and the total cost was to be $9,680.00, plus a refundable bond of $1,000.00. The applicants paid th...

9. Taylor v Corrections [2018] NZHRRT 35 [pdf, 308 KB]

   ...Corrections’ approach to responding to Privacy Act requests [64] The response to Mr Taylor’s request in the present case [69] Mr Arbuckle – credibility assessment and findings [71] THE REDACTION COMPLAINT – DISCUSSION [75] PERSONAL INFORMATION [78] Interpretation – text, purpose and context [78] About [83] Other interests to be balanced [86] Open texture [91] Context [92] Judicial interpretation of personal information – senior courts [106] Judicial interpretat...

10. [2015] NZEmpC 24 Lowe v Director-General of Health, Ministry of Health & Ors [pdf, 194 KB]

    ...Co-ordination (NASC) organisation, which decides whether the client is eligible for Carer Support, whether Carer Support is an appropriate support option for the client and full-time carer, and the extent of the client’s eligibility. The NASC informs the client and full time carer about their carer support allocation and how the system works. They also inform the Ministry how many days per year it has allocated to a full-time carer for support. Once the Ministry receives notifi...