12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 62 APPLICANT OX RESPONDENT ND The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. OX was flatting with ND who was the tenant of the property at [Address]. OX was not on the lease but was in effect sub-leasing from ND as head tenant. The parties had signed an agreement dated 9 August 2020. In or about October 2...
...application is opposed by E to. [4] In this decision I explain why the making of interim preservation orders is necessary in the interests of justice to preserve Mr Matsuoka's position. The interim order application and its grounds [5] The forms of relief sought in the statement of claim are: [5.1] A declaration of interference with privacy. [5.2] An order requiring E to to provide Mr Matsuoka with all communications between itself and LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd (LSG) relati...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 116 APPLICANT D Ltd RESPONDENT C Ltd (NZ) The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. D Ltd operates [holiday accommodation] in [Town]. It uses C Ltd (Int) as one of its booking platforms. Within the [holiday accommodation] are 21 separate apartments, each listed separately on C Ltd (Int) as each apartment is individually owned....
...SS APPLICANT YO RESPONDENT SR The Tribunal orders: The claim by SS and YO against SR is partially proved. SR is to pay SS and YO the sum of $5,374.08 on or by 5:00 pm on 21 March 2024. Reasons 1. SS and YO (the applicants) bring a claim against SR (The respondent) for $8,472.39. 2. The issues to be resolved are: (a) What is the legal framework for considering the claim? (b) Was the waste pump installed correctly? (c) If not, was the pump in brea...
...mind that she might later be able to get a visa to live in New Zealand permanently if she had adequate English language skills. [2] The critical point in Mr Jiang’s instructions occurred when Immigration New Zealand responded to Ms Wang’s application and requested additional information. Prior to the end of the time allowed to supply the information Ms Wang gave it to Mr Jiang. However, Immigration New Zealand only received part of the information. The result was that Immigr...
CLAIM NO: TRI-2007-101-000022 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN JOHN ANDREW HAMILTON and JADE HAMILTON Claimants AND O’DONNELL BRICK AND TILE LIMITED First Respondent AND CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL Dated 16 August 2007 Background 1. John and Jade Hamilton have filed an application with the...
...Kaupapa Inquiry MEMORANDUM-DIRECTIONS OF CHIEF JUDGE DR C L FOX ADDRESSING MATTERS CONCERNING THE WĀNANGA Ā-ROHE PHASE 30 Whiringa-ā-Nuku 2024 Wai 3300, #2.6.27 TEOFILH New Stamp Purpose 1. This memorandum-directions addresses several claimant memoranda filed in response to my directions commencing the wānanga ā-rohe phase for the Tomokia ngā tatau o Matangireia – the Constitutional Kaupapa Inquiry (Wai 3300). Procedural background Commencement of wānanga ā-rohe...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 187 APPLICANT KN RESPONDENT MQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: MQ Ltd is to pay the sum of $3,300.00 to KN on or before Friday 11 November 2022. Reasons: 1. On 16 November 2019, KN (the purchaser) entered into a sale and purchase agreement with MQ Ltd (the vendor) for Unit 8 in a development under construction at [Addre...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 461 APPLICANT QD Ltd RESPONDENT QC The Tribunal orders: QC is to pay QD Ltd $1,458.20 by 24 July 2023. Reasons 1. QC contracted QD Ltd (QR) to kill and process a steer. 2. The job was delayed due to QR suffering a stroke. 3. The job was eventually done in May 2022. The meat was packaged into ten banana bo...