12542 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 587 APPLICANT IE RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. IE has claimed that X Ltd failed to provide satisfactory advice to him about an Enduring Power of Attorney for his father (NE). In 2019, IE was ordered by the Family Court to refund approximately $137,000.00 of his father’s money to his father...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2011] NZDT 168 BETWEEN ADI APPLICANT AND ZWR Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 8 April 2011 Referee: Referee Davidson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Applicant’s claim is dismissed. Pursuant to s 11(2)(b) of the Disputes Tribunals Act 1988 the Applicant, ADI, must pay the Respondent, ZWR Ltd, $93.33 (incl GST) within 7 days of the date of this order. Facts...
Claim No: 1240 Under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 In the matter of an adjudication claim Between Auckland City Council (as assignee) Claimant And Mark Brian Russell Respondent Partial Determination 21 September 2005 1. Index Para No Heading Page 1. Index 1 2. Summary of Determination 1 3. Adjudication Claim 2 4. The Hearing 4 5. The Present Claim 5 6. Leaks, Damage and Repairs 6 7. General Damages 7 8. Present Cla...
LCRO 178/2011 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Wellington Standards Committee 2 BETWEEN GF of [North Island] Applicant AND UH of [North Island] Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] UH (the Practitioner) acted for GF (the Applicant) in relati...
Claim No: 2891 Under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 In the matter of an adjudication claim Between David Lindsay Cameron and Brenda Muriel Cameron Claimants And Hastings District Council First respondent And David Lawrence Stevenson Second respondent And Chris Chote Third respondent And BMW Plumbing Limited Fourth respondent And Garry Brown Fifth respondent Determination 20...
...information and insight into Crown-Maori relations from 1840 to the present day. This version of the bibliography is complete until the end of 2011. As we finish our large district historical inquiries and move our focus to contemporary and kaupapa claims it will continue to be updated to include further reports and evidence produced as part of our ongoing inquiry programme. Official Tribunal reports can already be viewed on our website soon after they are released. It is intended...
...information and insight into Crown-Maori relations from 1840 to the present day. This version of the bibliography is complete until the end of 2011. As we finish our large district historical inquiries and move our focus to contemporary and kaupapa claims it will continue to be updated to include further reports and evidence produced as part of our ongoing inquiry programme. Official Tribunal reports can already be viewed on our website soon after they are released. It is intended that...
...v BCM NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 234 [23 December 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 234 EMPC 2/2015 IN THE MATTER OF of an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN AFT Applicant AND BCM Respondent Hearing: By memoranda of submissions and affidavits filed on 21 April, 25 May, 25 June, 14 and 20 July, 18 and 31 August, 14 September, 12 October and 3 November 2015 Appearances: Appl...
BRONWYN JOY CLEARKIN v GENEVA HEALTHCARE LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2019] NZEmpC 2 [23 January 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2019] NZEmpC 2 EMPC 2/2019 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge BETWEEN BRONWYN JOY CLEARKIN Applicant AND GENEVA HEALTHCARE LIMITED Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: B Clearkin, applicant in person M Manik, agent for respondent Jud...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...