Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12922 items matching your search terms

  1. AG Ltd v SQ [2018] NZDT 1443 (30 October 2018) [pdf, 105 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2018] NZDT 1443 APPLICANT AG Ltd RESPONDENT SQ The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim by AG Ltd against SQ is dismissed. REASONS 1. On 28 August 2015, SQ and MN lent $500 from AG Ltd. Payments of $15 per week were made initially but were made less frequently in late 2015 and then stopped completely in 2016. AG Ltd se...

  2. QH v KH [2020] NZDT 1467 (2 December 2020) [pdf, 188 KB]

    ...currently work and it is not known exactly when it stopped working. It is shown working in the marketing photos for the property. In the emails presented, the pool light is noted to be functioning on 12 June, 4 days before settlement. By 3 July QH had informed the real estate agents that it was not working. There is no further evidence as to when it failed. For these reasons I find that it is not proven on the balance of probabilities that the light failed prior to settlement. Therefore,...

  3. NX & QT v X Ltd [2023] NZDT 209 (28 April 2023) [pdf, 107 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 209 APPLICANT NX and QT RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons Did X Ltd breach the Fair Trading Act 1986 regarding advertised prices? 1. NX and QT have claimed that X Ltd has breached the Fair Trading Act 1986 (FTA). Their claim is that X Ltd offered prices for travel but fares were...

  4. N Ltd v R Ltd & TQ [2024] NZDT 418 (9 May 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 418 APPLICANT N Ltd RESPONDENT R Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT TQ The Tribunal orders: TQ and R Ltd, jointly and severally, are to pay N Ltd $15,000 by 27 May 2024. If that full sum is not paid by the given date, TQ and R Ltd, jointly and severally, are ordered to pay N Ltd $25,126.35 by 28 May 2024. Reasons: 1. It is an undisput...

  5. Hastie and Dredge TRI-2023-100-001 Procedural Order 5 [pdf, 251 KB]

    ...ARCHITECT LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 1496058) Fourth Respondent AND DSF BUILDERS LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 1863635) Fifth Respondent AND CONTRACT HOLDINGS LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 636388) Sixth Respondent PROCEDURAL ORDER 5 Removal application by the sixth respondent - declined Dated 22 February 2024 2 Introduction [1] The sixth respondent has applied to be removed from this proceeding under s 112 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006...

  6. BL & CL v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 413 (24 April 2024) [pdf, 184 KB]

    ...received by 1pm on 6 February 2024, they would cancel the contract and seek a refund of fees paid to that time. This is what occurred. B Ltd did then provide a link to revised plans on 10 February 2024, although BL and CL say these did not address the requested changes. 2. B Ltd advised by email on the day of the hearing, that it would not be attending. Two telephone calls were made to B Ltd at the time of the hearing and the dispute was also called in the Courthouse. In accordance wit...

  7. Te Manutukutuku Issue 21 [pdf, 2.6 MB]

    Te Roopu Whakamana i te Tiriti 0 Waitangi Panui Rua tekau rna tahi Paengawhawha 1993 Waitangi Tribunal Division Department of Justice Newsletter ISSN 0114-717X Number 21 April 1993 Waitangi Tribunal Reports on Pouakani Claim The Waitangi Tribunal has recommended that 370-acres of Crown owned forest land in the central North Island be returned to Maori in settlement of .the Pouakani claim. The lands had originally been taken in part pay­ ment of costs associated with land sur...

  8. Cambie v ACC [2012] NZACA 7 [pdf, 72 KB]

    ...Respondent BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY R Bedford HEARING at Wellington on 15 December 2011 APPEARANCES/COUNSEL Mylinh Dao for appellant Alistair Barnett for respondent INTERIM DECISION [1] This is an application for leave to appeal out of time against a review decision which was delivered in 1993, upholding the Corporation’s decision of 9 March 1993, to decline the appellant’s claim under the Accident Compensation Act 1982 for cover for h...

  9. Hayward v Barnardos NZ Inc (Jurisdiction) [2022] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 142 KB]

    ...action is unnecessary or inappropriate; or (b) decide to investigate the complaint under subpart 2. (3) As soon as practicable after making a decision under subsection (2), the Commissioner must notify the complainant of the decision. [13] The application of PA, s 98(1)(a) was discussed in Re Jones (Rejection of Statement of Claim) [2021] NZHRRT 19 at [14]: [14] ... Proceedings under s 98(1)(a) are only possible where the Commissioner first decides to use best endeavours to secure a...

  10. [2018] NZEmpC 98 Ovation NZ Ltd v The NZ Meat Workers and Related Trades Union [pdf, 343 KB]

    ...WELLINGTON [2018] NZEmpC 98 [20 August 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2018] NZEmpC 98 EMPC 196/2018 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed in full from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a verification order BETWEEN OVATION NEW ZEALAND LIMITED First Plaintiff AND TE KUITI MEAT PROCESSORS LIMITED Second Plaintiff AND THE NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS AND RELATED TRADES UNION...