12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1715 APPLICANT KQ RESPONDENT XQ SECOND RESPONDENT AB The Tribunal orders: The claim by KQ against XQ and AB is dismissed. Reasons 1. XQ and AB own a property at [Address suppressed] (“the property”). KQ, who is XQ’s mother, was living with them in that property from September 2019. While KQ was li...
...14 Proposed Family Legal Support Fee Schedule: 15 4 Introduction The Family Court Reform Bill has been passed into legislation and the new Family Justice System is planned to begin from March 2014. As part of implementing the reforms, the Secretary for Justice intends to establish a new specified legal service to assist eligible people with their care of children and guardianship issues. This service will provide up to four hours of legal support for people who meet t...
...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached information. The letter from Parker and A...
...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached information. The report prepared for the...
...Section 49 of the Act provides that claimants may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached information. The letter from Nigel Mon...
...circumstances from the time Ms Dablo had taken the risk of continuing to work, and it would be worse if the employers became aware and Ms Dablo had to stop working. She needed to sustain herself financially. Professional advice and direction [85] Ms Tan claims she acted professionally and appropriately throughout. [86] The communications in the electronic messages were as friends. However, Ms Tan appropriately continued to advise Ms Dablo that she needed to find work in her field in...
...personal information; and (b) to have access to that information. (2) Where, in accordance with subclause (1)(b), an individual is given access to personal information, the individual shall be advised that, under principle 7, the individual may request the correction of that information. (3) The application of this principle is subject to the provisions of Parts 4 and 5. [5] By email dated 28 May 2009 Mr Te Wini sent to Mr Askelund an attachment in the form of a letter dated 5 Ma...
...AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2024] NZLCDT 44 LCDT 016/24 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 Applicant AND TAE WOK KWON Practitioner CHAIR Ms D Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Hon P Heath KC Ms S Hughes KC Prof D Scott Ms S Stuart HEARING 22 November 2024 HELD AT Specialist Courts and Tribunals Centre...
...that trustee may, if the circumstances permit, appoint an attorney to act in his or her stead. [26] The Committee noted that “no advice appears to have been sought by the complainants regarding the Construction Contracts Act when the Trust was formed”.5 It further noted, that as one of the Trustees of the Trust was a company of which the firm’s partners were directors, it was reasonable for Mr LB to expect that Mr and Mrs CN would contact the firm to discuss any proposals that...
...decision is to be cited as Vivash v Accident Compensation Corporation [2020] NZHRRT 16.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2020] NZHRRT 16 2 INDEX INTRODUCTION [1] THE EVIDENCE [9] The back injuries of 1982, 1985 and 2002 [9] The requests by Mr Vivash for access to his files [18] ACC document retention policy [26] Destruction of the 1985 claim file [27] The failure to provide the weekly compensation information [28] Comment on the ACC document retention policy whi...