Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal - 30 April 2015 Record of Inquiry index [pdf, 667 KB]

   ...Ruakaka, Takahiwai, Maungakaramea, Poupouwhenua, Motutere Island, Te Mahe and Waipu land blocks, and other lands taken for Public Works. Further concerns are coastal lands and the seabed around Bream Bay, fishing rights and mineral rights. The claim requests the return of land, some of which now appears to be in private ownership Status: Consolidated 1.1.0056(a) Wai 504, 1.1(a) Amendment Received: 5 Nov 99 1.1.0057 Wai no: 510, 1.1 Date of SOC: 28 Apr 95 Date received: 09 May 95 Claimant: A...

2. DS v VH Ltd [2016] NZDT 898 (11 February 2016) [pdf, 24 KB]

   ...contained in the CGA. However, the issues in dispute are of a contractual nature, specifically whether or not the deposit is refundable. DS claims a refund of the $1,000.00 deposit. Issues [5] The issues to determine are:. a. Was a contract formed when DS paid the deposit and signed the handwritten document, and if so, what was the nature of the contract? b. Was DS in breach of the contract by cancelling two days later? c. Is DS entitled to a refund of the deposi...

3. HK Ltd v MO Ltd [2022] NZDT 120 (3 August 2022) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...not need to be addressed, and MO LTD is liable to pay the balance of the contract price. Once this is paid, HK LTD is to deliver the Type B shelves to MO LTD. Referee: J Perfect Date: 3 August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

4. E and E v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2019] CEIT-2019-0013 [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...SOMERVILLE DATED 18 December 2019 ___________________________________________________________________________ Case stated [1] The respondent (IAG) has filed an application for referral of a question of law. That application, which took the form of a memorandum of counsel, outlined the question of law for which it sought referral and attached a draft case stated. The application was served on the other parties but only the applicants and the third respondent (QBE)...

5. DD & UD v AX & Ors [2024] NZDT 187 (26 March 2024) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...issued because the boss was angry when he found out their salesperson had given the [courtesy car] to DD and UD without authority. That, of course, is not N Ltd’s customers’ responsibility, and N Ltd’s recognition that hire payment is not due, is formalised via a declaration of non-liability. Are UD/DD liable to pay costs of repair to the [courtesy car]? 20. The circumstances of UD’s collision are such that, in the ordinary course of events, she would be liable to pay for...

6. BE v TT Ltd & Ors [2024] NZDT 838 (18 November 2024) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...poor condition and needs replacement? b. Did the Respondents misrepresent the condition of the roof? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 5 c. Can BE prove that vendors knew about the poor condition of the roof and have they withheld this information from her? Can BE prove that the roof is in poor condition and needs replacement? 7. BE she hired a builder to replace windows in the property with double-glazed windows in May 2024. The same builder was also asked to clean the gut...

7. PV v OS & B Ltd [2023] NZDT 172 (3 May 2023) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...panel beater to get the car fixed. PV refused and filed a claim with J Ltd. 5. The initial claim amount was for $4,670.03. I noted that the repairers’ invoice was for $3,962.53. At the hearing J Ltd said they neglected to include the rental information. They therefore deducted the rental charge from its claim. The claim amount is therefore $3,962.53. 6. OS and B Ltd are disputing liability. WS is the director and shareholder of B Ltd. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 T...

8. T v C Ltd v IQ & LQ [2023] NZDT 230 (18 September 2023) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...hearing that this was a fair outcome and was no longer making any claim against IQ & LQ. Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 2 November 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

9. CU Ltd v ZS & HC Ltd [2023] NZDT 588 (24 November 2023) [pdf, 272 KB]

   ...this, the applicant bears the burden of proof on the balance of probabilities (that is, that it is more likely than not). When assessing whether the onus of proof has been discharged by an applicant, I need to consider and evaluate the evidence and information presented by the parties. While I have carefully considered all the evidence and submissions from Page 2 of 4 the parties, I have only addressed the evidence and arguments to the extent necessary to explain my decision....

10. TD v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 414 (14 August 2023) [pdf, 192 KB]

    ...first repair, she would have had the same answer as U Ltd gave at the hearing, which was that she caused the problem, and the motorhome was of acceptable quality. 13. TD did not lose her right to claim from U Ltd under the CGA because she informed U Ltd of a problem and U Ltd did not accept it had liability for repairs. What amount should be ordered? 14. I have ordered all the amounts claimed by TD except for the $350.00 for incidentals. I accept a friend helped out howe...