Search Results

1. QW v RH LCRO 166/2012 (18 October 2016) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...counsel, because Mr BL had responded to the review application on Mr RH’s behalf, and Mr QW wanted representation at the review hearing to proceed on an “equal footing”.5 [51] On [Date] Mr KN indicated he would not be available on [Date], and requested alternative dates. This Office advised the parties that it might be possible to convene a hearing in [Date] if they consented, but that the review hearing would otherwise proceed as scheduled on [Date]. [52] The parties did no...

2. Burns v Argon Construction Ltd [pdf, 19 KB]

   ...limitation on 28 August 2007. This hearing was adjourned as a result of the claimants delay in complying with timetable orders and a new hearing date was set for 10 October 2007. [20] On 3 September 2007 the first and second respondents requested that the claim proceed to mediation before the Tribunal determined the question of limitation. [21] Once Argon and the Council consented to proceed to mediation the claimants were justified in pursuing their claim. Even if, a...

3. Emtage v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC166 [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...Chiropractic or fucken ane ... I don’t care. Whatever I can get in to see ... will keep you updated ... Docs at 12.15. … 2 weeks...got cert. Booked in for xrays and physio ... ffs” [5] On 6 May 2019, Dr Kamali completed an ACC injury claim form, giving the description of injury as: “Got hit by a heavy bar of the truck while emptying bin – paid work – impact with a sharp object.” Dr Kamali recorded the accident date as 3 April 2019. Dr Kamali’s diagnosis was con...

4. [2018] NZEmpC 67 Wendco (NZ) Ltd v Unite Inc [pdf, 322 KB]

   ...primarily relied on the tort of trespass. In such a case, a plaintiff must satisfy the Court that there has been an unjustified direct interference with its land; such a claim is actionable per se without proof of actual damage.15 [64] A legitimate request was made in the letter from Wendco’s lawyer of 25 May 2018 to Unite, and in notices that were sent to staff and displayed for them to view. [65] Unite contests whether evidence provided by Wendco to the Court in the form of p...

5. Te Whare Maire Trust - Lot 5 DP 8663 (2005) 87 Ōpōtiki MB 238 (87 OPO 238) [pdf, 3.9 MB]

   ...along with various other Waiotahi blocks. As a result the Registrar was unable to produce a report for Section 11 in the Parish of Waiotahi regarding the historical chain of title. By this date the Court had before it the original application and a request for joinder by Mr Toby Wikotu and the Upokorehe Incorporation. For the avoidance of doubt as to who were the applicants, an order was made under section 71/93 recognising the status of the different applicants before the Court. Min...

6. OIA-111774.pdf [pdf, 593 KB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 3 July 2024 Our ref: OIA 111774 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Judicial expenses Thank you for your email of 1 May 2024, requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), information on judicial expenses. Specifically, you requested: 1. all expense claims made by senior court judges and em...

7. Turner v University of Otago [2021] NZHRRT 18 [pdf, 443 KB]

   ...Forster for plaintiff Mr BCS Dorking and Mr M Couling for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 12 and 13 October 2015; 2 to 5 May 2016 DATE OF DECISION: 25 March 2021 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 INDEX INTRODUCTION [1] Background to the requests [2] The Employment Relations Authority [7] The complaint to the Privacy Commissioner [10] Delay [13] Legislative changes [14] 1 [This decision is to be cited as Turner v University of Otago [2021] NZHRRT 18.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS...

8. Fitikefu v Department of Corrections (Strike-Out Application) [2019] NZHRRT 51 [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...[1] Mr Fitikefu complains that the Department of Corrections (Corrections) breached his privacy when it disclosed an assessment report about him to a service provider called Early Start. Early Start was at that time working with Mr Fitikefu’s former partner and baby daughter. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Fitikefu v Department of Corrections (Strike-Out Application) [2019] NZHRRT 51.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2019] NZ

9. Hewitt v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 50 (30 August 2012) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...conclusions that may be reached on the basis of the information held at that point by the Tribunal. [22] The Minute made it clear to the parties they could provide further information, which would be considered by the Tribunal. [23] The Minute also requested further information from Mr Standing, and put him on notice that any response should take account of the fact he was facing multiple complaints, some of which had strikingly similar components. [24] The Minute explained to Mr Stan...

10. [2023] NZIACDT 18 - XX v Xu (1 June 2023) [pdf, 132 KB]

    ...2022. She received a copy that day and advised the complainant of the rejection of the mother’s visa, but she did not provide the letter to the complainant until 25 May 2022. 1 XX v Xu [2023] NZIACDT 12. 3 [8] Ms Xu lodged a s 61 request with Immigration NZ on 9 May 2022, acknowledging her role in failing to send the information. The request was refused by Immigration NZ on 24 May 2022. Decision of the Tribunal [9] The following breaches of the Code by Ms Xu were...