12542 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 432 APPLICANT XD RESPONDENT G Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. XD purchased a new G Ltd campervan in [Overseas Country] from [Caravan Company] and imported it into New Zealand. Prior to importing the campervan, XD asked G Ltd [Overseas Country] about the warranty that came with the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 616 APPLICANT BO RESPONDENT NI The Tribunal orders: NI is ordered to pay BO the sum of $1,999.00. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 20 December 2023. Reasons: 1) In December 2022, BO bought an e-scooter from NI. The price paid was $1,999.00. About six months after the purchase, the scooter stopped working. BO has requested a refun...
...be determined are: a. Who is the correct respondent? b. Whether the tub is of acceptable quality/fit for purpose. c. What remedy is available to HM. 3. An applicant (in this case HM) in the Tribunal must establish the elements of his claim to the required standard to be successful. That standard is the balance of probabilities (based on the evidence before the Tribunal) which means what is more likely than not. Who is the correct respondent? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2015] NZDT 1049 BETWEEN FB APPLICANT AND TY RESPONDENT AND TYY RESPONDENT’S INSURER Date of Order: 10/12/2015 Referee: Referee: Paton Simpson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed Facts [1] On 16 October 2013, FB purchased a 2007 Isuzu NQR75-2 7500GVM truck cab and chassis from TY 2004 Ltd (TY), and immediately converted it into a motor home...
......................... 10 Should I terminate the claim pursuant to section 109? ............................................ 13 Abuse of process .................................................................................................... 13 Application for transfer to the High Court ................................................................. 14 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 15 P...
...1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 125 APPLICANT BX APPLICANT HX RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: L Ltd is to pay the sum of $1,075.47 to BX and HX on or before Wednesday, 1 May 2024. The balance of the claim is dismissed. REASONS 1. The Applicants, BX and HX, wished to attend a special occasion in [town 1], in early February 2023. They decided to drive from their home in [town 2] to [town 1]. They booked a ferry crossing for two pas...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1651 APPLICANT FI RESPONDENT CI The Tribunal orders: CI is to pay FI $4,110.90 by 4pm on 29 November 2021. Reasons: 1. In August 2020, FI was walking her dog Freddie when there was an altercation with CI’s dog Chase. FI claims that as a result of Chase attacking Freddie, Freddie has required two surgeries...
...Land Court Rules 2011 to review a decision of the Registrar made on 27 June 2018, to refuse to accept a Notice of Appeal in respect of MANGATAINOKA 1 BC NO 2B NO 3 Chief Judge Introduction 1. This is an application by Fredrick Hill (the applicant), in terms of rule 4.10(3) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 (the Rules), to review a decision of the Registrar who refused to accept a Notice of Appeal from him dated 20 June 2018. Background 2. The Notice of Appeal (A201...
...requested that Mr AB make an appointment to discuss further options. [19] Ms OC relayed the outcome of the application to Mr NS in correspondence dated 6 September 2013. She confirmed that after having discussed the matter with Mr BR, she had formed a view that an application should be made for a visa pursuant to s 61 of the Immigration Act 2009 (s 61 application). This application was to be based on an offer of employment that Mrs RJ had received. [20] On 16 September 2013, M...
...OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2023] NZEmpC 87 EMPC 364/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to strike out the proceeding BETWEEN IAN RIDDLER Plaintiff AND MERIDIAN ENERGY LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 28 April 2023 (Heard at Christchurch via Audio Visual Link) Appearances: M Hubbl...