12922 items matching your search terms
1 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 513 APPLICANT SQ RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. SQ said that M Ltd breached the property management contract for the management of his rental house. The tenancy agreement limited the number of tenants to a maximum of four, however, one of them had her mother also staying in the house. SQ claimed for an increase in the we...
...prepare for case management conferences (CMC) in the CEIT and to assist understanding of the CEIT case management process. The CEIT uses a case management system which differs from the District and High Courts. The CEIT Member appointed to your application will handle every aspect of the application. This ensures that your application will be closely managed. Decisions will be made to ensure that the pathway to resolution is as speedy, flexible and cost-effective as possible. First...
CLAIM NO. 4309 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN The Tenants in Common of 19 Victoria Avenue (for full names see sheet attached at end of this Determination) Claimants AND EASTON CONSULTANTS LTD First Respondent AND No second respondent, Commercial Building Services Ltd having been removed AND No third respondent, Auckland City Council having been removed AND MATTHE...
...Work Experience Visa. However, his client could not get an Employer Supplementary Form, which is an essential prerequisite to apply for that class of visa. [1.2] Mr Kumar advised his client he could none-the-less apply, and proceeded to make the application. Immigration New Zealand responded explaining the application could not succeed. [1.3] Mr Kumar then advised his client to respond to Immigration New Zealand, essentially relying on the same information that Immigration New Zealand...
...retrieve in time. CU provided photographs as well, and said that the goods were “rubbish” and not worth anything. IH was not entirely clear regarding which goods were retrieved and which were not, and there is inadequate evidence to justify the value claimed, especially allowing for wear and tear. However, I am satisfied that IH did lose some items of value, and find that she is entitled to recover $500.00 as compensation. What sum, if any, is payable between the parties? 18. If the...
...EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2025] NZEmpC 60 EMPC 363/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for judicial review AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for a stay of proceedings BETWEEN HOSEA COURAGE, DANIEL PILGRIM AND LEVI COURAGE Plaintiffs AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL SUED ON BEHALF OF THE MINISTRY...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 566 APPLICANT IM Ltd RESPONDENT HI The Tribunal orders: HI is to pay the sum of $6,653.78 to IM Ltd on or before Tuesday 19 December 2023. Reasons: 1. In April 2022, HI engaged IM Ltd to provide legal advice regarding a dispute with the [redacted] District Council, and IM Ltd emailed HI a letter of engagement attaching its...
...Authority, discontinuing proceedings in the Authority seeking compliance, and not seeking costs associated with steps taken in this proceeding to that point in time. There was no response to that offer. [6] Mr Allison does not oppose an order but has requested it be for a lesser amount than Ceres claimed. Ms Oberndorfer, Mr Allison’s advocate, accepted that the calculation provided by Ceres complied with the Court’s Guideline Scale. A deduction was sought, however, because...
...in Mrs Marx receiving a final warning. The only further matters which had occurred following the concluded result of the first Discipline Committee’s meeting were that Mrs Marx had breached the bureaucratic rules surrounding her leave application and that she had not returned for the teacher training days at the end of January 2013. [21] Without fully traversing the process that the second Discipline Committee adopted resulting in Mrs Marx’s dismissal, it appears to...
EBIIWU & ANOR V CARTER HOLT HARVEY LTD & ANOR AK 15 September 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2910] NZEMPC 75 ARC 109/09 IN THE MATTER OF an application for compliance AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN EASTERN BAY INDEPENDENT INDUSTRIAL WORKERS UNION INC First Plaintiff AND JIM MOENGAROA AND OTHERS Second Plaintiffs AND CARTER HOLT HARVEY LIMITED First Defendant AND KEVIN MACKENZIE Second Defendant Hear...