12542 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 608 APPLICANT LH APPLICANT TH RESPONDENT D Inc The Tribunal orders: D Inc are to pay LH and TH $500.00 on or before 28 November 2023. Reasons 1. LH and TH hired the [venue] at [address], for their wedding on Saturday 14 January 2023. They entered into a hire agreement (the contract) with the D Inc, who lease [the v
...TITHER NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 142 [23 August 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 142 ARC 44/12 IN THE MATTER OF an application to vary a freezing order and ancillary orders BETWEEN HORTON MEDIA LIMITED Applicant AND NORAH LAURENCE TITHER Respondent Hearing: 23 August 2012 (by telephone) and by memoranda filed on 22 August 2012 Counsel: Stephen Langton, counsel for applicant Charlotte Parkhill, counsel for respondent...
...APPLICANT IN APPLICANT MG RESPONDENT NF Ltd The Tribunal orders: NF Ltd is to pay the sum of $6,900.00 to IN and MG on or before Monday 6 June 2022. Reasons: 1. In May 2020, after the first Covid-19 lockdown, the applicants IN and her (now) daughter-in-law MG made a wedding booking with NF Ltd (the venue) for 27 November 2021. There were to be 150 guests, and the total cost was to be $9,680.00, plus a refundable bond of $1,000.00. The applicants paid th...
...AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 200 [5 November 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 200 ARC 74/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to strike out BETWEEN TUI VAAI Plaintiff AND MOANA PACIFIC FISHERIES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers filed on 31 October 2014 Appearances: P Swarbrick and T Oldfield, counse...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 760 APPLICANT TF 1st RESPONDENT 2nd RESPONDENT (joined) NX Ltd TQ The Tribunal orders: TQ shall pay TF $2,000.00 by 19 December 2023. Reasons: 1. TF paid $2,000.00 to NX Ltd on 27 October 2022 for an outboard motor. 2. TQ is the sole director of NX Ltd. TQ advised TF that there was a motor available if TF pa...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
...under subsection (1), the parties to the adjudication must meet their own costs and expenses. [3] The claim against the council was that it failed to oversee the building certifier or check the building during or after construction. Prior applications [4] The first application for removal was unsuccessful as reported in Procedural Order No. 3 dated 17 August 2009. [5] After the council had filed its response to the claim on 3 September 2009 the council made a secon...
CLAIM NO: TRI-2007-101-000022 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN JOHN ANDREW HAMILTON and JADE HAMILTON Claimants AND O’DONNELL BRICK AND TILE LIMITED First Respondent AND CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL Dated 16 August 2007 Background 1. John and Jade Hamilton have filed an application with the...
...___________________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF C P SOMERVILLE DATED 18 December 2019 ___________________________________________________________________________ Case stated [1] The respondent (IAG) has filed an application for referral of a question of law. That application, which took the form of a memorandum of counsel, outlined the question of law for which it sought referral and attached a draft case stated. The application was...
...information. [8] On 28 November 2019, Ms M, an employee of Heytour in China, rang the complainant (who was in China) and told him that Immigration NZ was not satisfied with the predicted finance figure, so he would need to sign a withdrawal request. She sent a 3 template withdrawal form via WeChat to him and invited him to sign it. Later that evening, the complainant returned the signed form to Ms M. On the same day, Mr Sun sent it to Immigration NZ. On 19 December 2019, the...