12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 159 APPLICANT NH Ltd RESPONDENT NZ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In June 2020, NZ engaged NH Ltd to construct a driveway for his newly built home. On 31 July 2020, after the work was complete, NH Ltd invoiced NZ $30,111.60, but NZ was unhappy with the job and only paid $13,800.00. NH Ltd now claims $18,81...
...[1] Peter and Susan Adams are the owners of a house at 3A Waikare Road, Oneroa, Waiheke Island. In 1995 they arranged for additions and alterations to the dwelling. Unfortunately those alterations leaked and so Mr and Mrs Adams lodged an application under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002, in December 2002. They completed the remedial work and filed proceedings in the High Court in December 2009. Those proceedings were struck out in June 2010 because they...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 764 APPLICANT DU RESPONDENT BT The Tribunal orders: BT is to pay DU $4,846.80 by 1 October 2024. Reasons: 1. In 2014, the parties entered into agreement that each would reimburse the other for any child support payments received through the IRD or any other agency. DU seeks reimbursement of $5,932.00 in child support payments. He also...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 182 APPLICANT LU RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: Both claims are dismissed. Reasons 1. LU engaged C Ltd to carry out decking work at her property in [Address]. Some extra work was agreed to during the build. The invoice ($13,028.10) was more than LU expected and she arranged to pay it by instalments. After pay...
...application. The applicant was not represented by legal Counsel, but had the assistance of Norman Tane acting in the nature of a McKenzie friend. [2] The applicant provided an invoice for costs of $600.00. The invoice was not detailed and the COUlt requested the applicant to provide actual evidence of the costs incun'ed in the application. No such evidence has been provided and it is now appropriate that the Court makes a decision in respect of the costs application. Applicant&...
...Tribunal said it was important to remember that Ngai Tahu's major grievances were first made last century, but despite repeated approaches to successive governments the Crown failed to respond adequately. The long and complex nature of the claims is reflected in the size of the three-volume report, but the Tribunal stresses that no section should be taken in isolation and that the report needs to be examined in full to gain a proper perspective. The Ngai Tahu report is available...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
...to item COVID-19 Protection Framework traffic light system – Update (19/4/2022) Web2text system is currently experiencing issues receiving text message replies Free Communication Assistance Forum for lawyers – 13 April 2022 The RSU Confirmation of claim form is no longer required in support of an LA application for first refugee/protected person claim Changes to the COVID-19 Protection Framework in the courts and tribunals Additional wait time can be claimed by legal aid providers required...
...only in response to the original complaint made by the Respondent [8] The Applicant has applied for a review of this decision. Review [9] The review proceeded by way of an Applicant only hearing on 5 July 2011. [10] During the hearing I requested that the Applicant provide me subsequently with the material that was posted on the website. This was provided by a letter dated 21 July and 3 included translations of comments posted on the website by Mr WD about the Applicant...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2016] NZDT 898 BETWEEN DS APPLICANT AND VH LIMITED RESPONDENT Date of Order: 11 February 2016 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] DS wished to purchase a car to convert to a taxi, so in August 2014 he test-drove a car for sale from the yard of VH Limited ('VH'). He took it to his friend's mechanical w...