Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12922 items matching your search terms

  1. BF v XX [2023] NZDT 245 (18 May 2023) [pdf, 197 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 245 APPLICANT BF RESPONDENT XX The Tribunal orders: XX is to pay the sum of $636.69 to BF on or before Thursday 8 June 2023. Reasons: 1. On 17 February 2022, BF (the head tenant) entered into a flat-sharing agreement with XX (the flatmate). The flatmate paid a bond of $250.00, and two weeks’ rent in advance a...

  2. KS v OT Ltd [2020] NZDT 1406 (17 December 2020) [pdf, 129 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1406 APPLICANT KS RESPONDENT OT Ltd RESPONDENT OT Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. KS rented a storage unit from OT Ltd. On 29 May 2020 the premises were burgled. KS’s unit, and 22 others, were broken into. Some personal items including a watch, shoes and golf clubs were taken from KS...

  3. OS v E Ltd [2023] NZDT 89 (23 March 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 89 APPLICANT OS RESPONDENT E Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 2. OS is seeking compensation from E Ltd for failing to deliver goods within a reasonable time. The claim is disputed by E Ltd. 3. The issue for determination by the Tribunal is whether OS is entitled to compensation for th...

  4. SD v MT [2024] NZDT 57 (19 February 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 57 APPLICANT SD RESPONDENT MT APPLICANT'S INSURER B Ltd The Tribunal orders: MT is to pay the sum of $1,484.75 to B Ltd on or before Monday 11 March 2024. Reasons: 1. On 5 May 2023, there was a collision between SD’s [vehicle] and MT’s car on the roundabout at the intersection between [Road 1] and [Road...

  5. S Ltd v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 779 (20 November 2023) [pdf, 107 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 779 APPLICANT S Ltd RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: U Ltd is to pay the sum of $700.00 to S Ltd on or before 11 December 2023. Reasons: 1. U Ltd (the buyer) opened a credit account with S Ltd (the seller) in 2021, and signed a document that set out the seller’s general conditions of sale. Clause 7 of those conditions ga...

  6. QE v TA [2023] NZDT 791 (22 December 2023) [pdf, 91 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 791 APPLICANT QE RESPONDENT TA APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: TA is to pay J Ltd the sum of $2,229.74 on or before 31 January 2024. Reasons: 1. TA reversed into QE’s parked car. She accepts responsibility for the collision but queries the extent of the damage and the cost of repairs org...

  7. DI v H Ltd [2024] NZDT 684 (11 September 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 684 APPLICANT DI RESPONDENT H Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 15 September 2023 DI purchased a [Car] registration [redacted] from H Limited. The vehicle had a new Warrant of Fitness (WOF) expiring 19 March 2024. 2. On 13 December 2023 DI took the [Car] to [a Service Station] for a service. DI says...

  8. Larnark v Kirby LCRO 44 / 2010 (1 October 2010) [pdf, 83 KB]

    ...CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee No. 3 BETWEEN MR LARNARK MR LEICHSTER MS QUILT of Auckland Applicants AND MR KIRKBY of Auckland Practitioner The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Application for review [1] This application arises from circumstan...

  9. [2021] NZACC 20 - Jamieson v ACC (28 January 2021) [pdf, 160 KB]

    ...correct and dismissed Mr Jamieson’s appeal. The Corporation advised the Court that it wished to apply for costs and a timetable for the filing of submissions was fixed. Submissions have now been received from both parties.1 [2] The Corporation claims costs in the sum of $6,303 calculated on a 2B scale basis. Mr Jamieson opposes the application. 1 I understand that the Corporation’s submissions were filed outside of that timetable by a few days and Mr Jamieson oppose...

  10. ZH v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 17 (10 February 2024) [pdf, 194 KB]

    Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 17 APPLICANT ZH RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: C Ltd is to pay to ZH the amount of $2,400.00. Payment is to be made on or before 4 March 2024. Reasons 1. ZH rented a car from C Ltd on October 21, 2023. A bond and rental fee was paid for a two day hire period. The return date was a public holiday whereby C Ltd were closed. ZH was given ins...