12922 items matching your search terms
Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 771 APPLICANT H Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT QH SECOND RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim against QH is struck out. 2. The name of the second respondent is amended. 3. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. H Ltd placed a concrete driveway and paths for U Ltd in late 2021. It says it is owed $4,250.00 for its final invoice. 2....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 22 APPLICANT DT RESPONDENT BQ The Tribunal orders: 1. BQ is to pay DT $400.00 on or before 5.00pm on 8 March 2022 Reasons: 1. DT booked one night’s accommodation on [Travel website] at QW; property owned by BQ. The cost of the accommodation was $1,350.00 plus a cleaning fee of $110.00 for one night. DT claims that...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1673 APPLICANT QM RESPONDENT QU Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. QU Ltd is to pay $1,711.08 to QM on or before 31 October 2021. 2. Ownership of the [phone] reverts to QU Ltd. 3. QM is to return the [phone] to QU Ltd immediately at her cost. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 4. On 2 August 2021, QM (using the name KM)...
...SOLAR BRIGHT LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) [2021] NZEmpC 36 [25 March 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2021] NZEmpC 36 EMPC 312/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for rehearing AND IN THE MATTER of an application for access to court documents by Murray Spackman BETWEEN PATRICK MARTIN Applicant AND SOLAR BRIGHT LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Respondent He...
...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached information. The assessor’s report...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 647 APPLICANT DL Ltd RESPONDENT DX The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. DL Ltd entered into an agreement to build a custom vanity for DX. After the vanity was installed and the plumbing had been completed, including the sink installation, the top vanity draw would not close. DL Ltd took the top draw away, made s...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 279 APPLICANT CD Ltd RESPONDENT CO Ltd The Tribunal orders: CO Ltd is to pay $9152.91 to CD Ltd on or before 24 November 2022. Reasons 1. In late 2021, over several months, CD Ltd provided trucking services to CO Ltd across 12 construction sites, removing materials including soil, clay, rubbish and rocks and tipping them...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 53 APPLICANT HH RESPONDENT NC APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: NC is to pay J Ltd $2,858.19 on or before Wednesday 20 March 2024. Reasons: 1. On 25 January 2023, there was a collision between HH’s [ute] and NC’s campervan on a bridge on the [highway]. The collision occurred when NC tried to move from t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 431 APPLICANT FU RESPONDENT KT SECOND RESPONDENT G Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In January 2021 FU purchased a car from or through G Ltd, the purchase was financed with a loan from [finance company]. After about a week, he discovered oil leaking, and took it to KT, who said...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 56 APPLICANT LI Ltd RESPONDENT TC as Trustee of TC Family Trust The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. LI Ltd carried out preliminary work for TC (as Trustee) for a large home renovation project. She confirmed with LI Ltd in September 2022 that she had decided to engage their services as the builders for her h...