12542 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 87 APPLICANT AB RESPONDENT CD Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In early 2021, AB conditionally agreed to buy the property at (property address).The real estate agent organised a building inspection report to be completed by CD Limited (“CDL”), to assist AB in meeting conditions...
...received by 1pm on 6 February 2024, they would cancel the contract and seek a refund of fees paid to that time. This is what occurred. B Ltd did then provide a link to revised plans on 10 February 2024, although BL and CL say these did not address the requested changes. 2. B Ltd advised by email on the day of the hearing, that it would not be attending. Two telephone calls were made to B Ltd at the time of the hearing and the dispute was also called in the Courthouse. In accordance wit...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 33 Reference No. HRRT 042/2011 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY THE DEFENDANT FOR COSTS BETWEEN RAZDAN RAFIQ PLAINTIFF AND SECRETARY FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey, Member Dr AD Trlin, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr R Rafiq in person (no appearance) Mr S Cohen-Ron...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1306 APPLICANT TC and AK RESPONDENT BH and TH as trustees RESPONDENT LD as trustee The Tribunal orders: BH, TH and LD as trustees of the ABC Trust are to pay TC and AK $17,336.99 on or before Thursday 15 April 2021. Reasons: 1. TC and AK entered a share milking contract with the trustees of the ABC Trust (Trus
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 134 APPLICANT BC RESPONDENT GT SECOND RESPONDENT TT THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT BT THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT IC The Tribunal orders: TT and GT are jointly and severally liable to pay BC $3,504.00 within 28 days. BC has withdrawn his claim against BT and IC. Reasons [1] BC purch...
...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached information. The letter from Parker and A...
...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached information. The report prepared for the...
...Section 49 of the Act provides that claimants may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached information. The letter from Nigel Mon...
...consent to build a temporary house on the block. The defendants used their savings to build a house on the block and have lived there since 1996. [5] In evidence Mr Ellis said that he sent a letter to the defendants on or about 16 August 2005 requesting that they quit the block and remove their house. He said that since then he had on two or three occasions orally asked the defendants to remove their house. He also mentioned that he had written some additional letters to the defe...
...Book 178 AOT 80 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20060005222 UNDER Section 43, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 Hearing: IN THE MATTER OF Rangipo North 8 RANGI BRISTOL MATIU HAITANA AlDEN GILBERT CHRIS NGAITERUA Applicants 23 May 2006, 170 Aotea MB 51-60 Appearances: Mr M McGhie for Tamahaki Ms L Poutu for N gati Rangi Judgment: Mr Te K Williams for Ngati Waewae 29 November 2006 RESERVED DECISION OF JUDGE L R HARVEY ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARIN...