12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 396 APPLICANT NH Ltd RESPONDENT OZ Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. OZ Ltd must pay NH Ltd $28,437.56 by 4pm on 30 August 2023. 2. OZ Ltd’s counterclaim against NH Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicant provided weekly garden and ground maintenance services to the respondent for a property at [addr...
...If a claim is settled by agreement between the parties before the tribunal's determination is given, the tribunal— (a) must terminate the adjudication proceedings; and (b) if requested by the parties, may record the settlement in the form of a determination on agreed terms. [15] I do not accept that a claim can be settled by agreement when one party has objected to the terms of that agreement and refused to sign the deed of settlement. The claimants’ acceptance of...
Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 84 APPLICANT CQ RESPONDENT DW The Tribunal orders: DW is to pay CQ the sum of $5,980.00 on or before 10 February 2023. Reasons: 1. CQ and DW own adjoining properties in [community]. In May 2022 CQ served a fencing notice on DW. The notice indicated that CQ wanted to repair the concrete post and wire fence between their propert...
...services, and then measure those findings against the professional code. The complaint [5] The Registrar’s statement of complaint put forward the following background as the basis for the complaint: [5.1] Immigration New Zealand received an application for a visitor’s visa from an applicant (the applicant). Mr Bharani was listed on the visa application form as the person who provided immigration advice; he had completed a declaration to that effect. [5.2] When Immigration New...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 127 APPLICANT KQ RESPONDENT UN The Tribunal orders: UN is ordered to pay KQ the sum of $2,300.00. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 2 June 2023. Reasons: 1) In October 2021, the applicant bought a dog from the respondent. UN is a dog breeder. The price paid was $3,000.00. At the time of the sale, the dog was 6...
...the papers) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT A Leave to appeal is granted. B The approved question of law is whether the Secretary for Education is properly named as the sole respondent when the Employment Relations Authority investigates claims of the NZEI for declaratory and compliance orders for alleged breaches by the Secretary of the Primary Teachers’ Collective Agreement. C Costs are reserved. Solicitors: Crown Law Office, Wellington for Applicant Oak...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 439 BETWEEN BI APPLICANT AND YR INCORPORATED RESPONDENT Date of Order: 25 October 2013 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the matter is struck out for lack of jurisdiction. Reasons [1] The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear matters relating to Body Corporate levies because they are considered to be “money due under an enactment”...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1309 APPLICANT Mr M Wairoa RESPONDENT Ms U Wairoa The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Mr M replaced a boundary fence between his property and his neighbor, Ms U. 2. He filed a claim in the Tribunal seeking half the cost of the fence ($282.25) plus the cost of removing a flax ($80.00). 3...
Claim No: 0677 Under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 In the matter of an adjudication claim Between Hyun Hwa Jang Claimant And Kam Po Tse First respondent And Qixing Mo Second respondent And Deng Donglin Third respondent Determination July 2006 1. Index 1. Index 1 2. Summary 1 3. The Adjudication Claim 2 4. The Dwellinghouse 3 5. The Claim 4 6. Causation 5 7. First Respondent – Kam P...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 511 APPLICANT MZ RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: X Ltd is to pay MZ $1,414.00 on or before 13 November 2023. Reasons 1. MZ bought return tickets for her parents to fly to [Country] from the website operated by X Ltd. The website asked her to enter the first name and then the last name of each parent for the...