12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 754 APPLICANT EN and JE RESPONDENT TT and EH The Tribunal orders: TT and EH are to pay EN and JE $1,478.73 on or before Friday 29 November 2024. Reasons: 1. EN and EH were friends in [Country] before they immigrated to New Zealand with their partners. They agreed to rent a house together in New Zealand, and the arrangeme...
...statement of reply on the plaintiff and any other party. [2] By memorandum dated 16 January 2019 Serco New Zealand Ltd (Serco) has sought an extension of time for filing its statement of reply until 4pm on Friday 8 February 2019. The grounds of the request are that Serco was not served with a copy of the second amended statement of claim until Thursday 13 December 2018 with the result the statement of reply fell due for filing and service by 16 January 2019. As service occurred just p...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 314 APPLICANT BS and CS RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: C Ltd is to pay BS and CS $2,817.05 on or before 6 May 2024. Reasons: 1. In mid-2022, BS and CS (the consumers) were planning a three-week trip to [country] at Christmas. They made an advance booking for their two [breed] cats, N and Z, at a [suburb] cattery owned by C Ltd
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 288 APPLICANT B Ltd RESPONDENT QM The Tribunal orders: QM is to pay the sum of $3072.80 to B Ltd by no later than 26 May 2024. Reasons: 1. In July 2023 QM ordered a motorised roof louvre with zip track blinds from M Ltd . Two separate quotes were provided, one for the motorised louvre, the other for the zip track blind. A 50% d...
...potential renters. 5. HM is entitled to decide who may share her home with her, however it was unreasonable to enter into the contract with XQ, twice request and receive payments under that contract and then cancel the contract on the basis of information she already knew before she offered XQ the room and entered the contract. 6. Accordingly, HM is required to refund the $500.00 and pay statutory interest of $10.22, pursuant to s20 of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988. Refer...
...Taupe; MB 36 A20090008486 UNDER Section 19, Te Ture Whenua Miiori Act 1993 Judgment: IN THE MA TIER OF Opepe Farm Trust -Injunction 10 June 2009 W[LLlAM TEMUERA ROBERT HALL Applicant RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE G D CARTER [1] The above application seeking an injunction was received on 21 May 2009. Directions for service on Jim Maniapoto, the Chairperson of the Trustees was given by Judge Savage and the matter set down for hearing on 5 June 2009. [2] On 29 May 2009 Mr Mania...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 7 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1313 APPLICANT NA RESPONDENT OI, BX, DI and KI as trustees of the OI Trust APPLICANT’S INSURER ABC Ltd RESPONDENT’S INSURER XYZ Ltd The Tribunal orders: OI, BX, DI and KI as the trustees of the OI Trust are to pay $2,066.59 to NA on or before 15 March 2021. Reasons: 1. NA owns a property...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 219 BETWEEN AF APPLICANT AND ZU Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT AND ZUZ Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 8 May 2013 Referee: Referee Tunnicliffe ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim by AF, the applicants, for a refund of $698.17 is dismissed. AF are to pay $703.69 to ZUZ Ltd on or before 20 May 2013. Facts [1] During the hearing the correct respondent...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 665 BETWEEN AU APPLICANT AND ZF District Council RESPONDENT Date of Order: 5 August 2014 Referee: Referee Savage ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is struck out. Facts [1] In 1974 CC Borough installed the sewer line on AU's street and offered the opportunity for connections, to property owners. Mr and Mrs AU did not connect and opted to cont...
...Self-represented Complainant: Self-represented Adviser: S Laurent, J Turner, counsel 2 PRELIMINARY [1] Mr Damon Parker, the adviser, represented Ms [NT], the complainant, who sought residence under the skilled migrant category. Her application failed as Immigration New Zealand found she provided false and misleading information. Her complaint is that she was left to work with a staff member of Mr Parker’s company, Ms Jessie Cheng, who is also his wife. Furthermore, M...