11414 items matching your search terms
...has not been met and therefore the claim is dismissed. Referee: Nigel Wolland Date: 22 March 2024 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...
...the exclusive jurisdiction of the Tenancy Tribunal and there is no ability under the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 to transfer the claim, it is struck out. Referee: GM Taylor Date: 14 September 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...
...matter of this claim now before the Tribunal are the same as for the matter previously heard. 8. For these reasons, this claim is struck out. Referee: K. Armstrong Date: 16 May 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...
...$1,484.75 in compensation for the damage caused by the collision. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 19 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...
...obtain evidence as to the identity of the driver of the black car in the future they may wish to consider filing a new claim against that person. L Trevelyan Disputes Tribunal Referee 11 March 2025 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...
...AND IN THE MATTER of an application for an order for disclosure of documents BETWEEN RADIUS RESIDENTIAL CARE LIMITED Plaintiff AND THE NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION INC First Defendant AND E TU INC (FORMERLY THE SERVICE & FOOD WORKERS UNION NGA RINGA TOTA INC) Second Defendant AND THE EMPLOYEES LISTED IN SCHEDULE A OF THE STATEMENT OF CLAIM Third Defendants Hearing: 27 June 2016 (Heard at Auckland) App
...hearing I was told that neither Mr Townsend nor Counsel had been aware of the company’s removal, and steps were being taken to have the company reinstated on the Register. Therefore, I am proceeding on the assumption that JTL is still a legally formed and registered company 3.8 The ninth respondent is Mr Peter Townsend, who is a director of JTL. The Owners claim that Mr Townsend has a personal liability for the claims that they Claim 00062 – Ponsonby Gardens Unit 7...
...BE Ltd and HL. 8. At the top right of the document is written, FC BDS (Otago), UED Ltd. This is followed by the address and contact details. At the top left is UED Ltd’s logo, which is owned by UED Ltd. Below that is the heading Orthodontic Information Sheet, then HL’s details. The treatment plan is set out, and there is a section entitled “orthodontic information and informed consent document”. 9. I note that the reference to “UED Ltd” under FC’s name is to the trad...
...from CF Ltd’s premises, and CF Ltd would normally give instruction to customers about how to operate the vehicles they bought. In this case, said BC, EL had asked for the car to be delivered to him in [City 1]. He had, therefore, not received the information that would normally be given to a customer. [10] LM said that EL had said in a telephone conversation that he, EL, had attempted to jump start the car. To do so, said LM, would not have been safe in a modern [type redacted] car,...
...contractual breach substantially reduces the benefit of the contract to the innocent party. I therefore find that SQ Ltd was entitled to cancel the contract. 10. The effect of cancellation under the CCLA is that neither party is obliged to continue performance of the contract, so SQ Ltd does not have to pay LD Ltd’s final invoice for $3,945.81 issued on 19 July 2021. Cancellation does not result in an automatic refund or discharge debts that have already accrued, so it does not affect...