Search Results

1. QE v TA [2023] NZDT 791 (22 December 2023) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...not likely to have been caused in this collision. Conclusion 9. For these reasons TA is to pay J Ltd the sum of $2,229.74 by the date stated in the order. Referee: K Rendall Date: 22 December 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

2. NX v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 84 (4 March 2024) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...If so, what is the quantum of the loss to which NX is entitled? 10. Because of my conclusion on the first issue, I am not required to address this issue. Referee: S Simmonds Date: 4 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

3. KS & TC v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 565 (5 August 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...costs are prohibited in the Disputes Tribunal, except in exceptional circumstances which do not apply here. Therefore, the claim for $233.16 is dismissed. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 5 August 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

4. Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal

   ...claims. Who can apply Find out what sort of claims the Tribunal can accept. Apply to the Tribunal Find out how to apply. What happens next Find out what to expect, from application to decision. FAQs Find answers to commonly asked questions. Forms and documents Read and download the application form, user guide and related documents. Tribunal decisions Search and read the Tribunal decisions with our decision finder. Contact us Contact someone at the Tribunal for assistance....

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals

5. [2019] NZEnvC 035 Taylor v Small [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...memorandum was filed and hearing dates of 25 and 26 July 2018 agreed. A timetable for evidence was imposed based on the parties' suggestions. 3 The evidence timetable was later extended, and the potential hearing date was adjourned at the request of both parties.4 Judicial telephone conference: the Court was advised that the filing of evidence had been completed and a report date of 3 August 2018 suggested to outline the outcome of a settlement meeting and advise whether a...

6. Baker - Part Lot 1 DP 13787 (formerly Pt Tarawera 5A) (2015) 41 Tākitimu MB 281 (41 TKT 281) [pdf, 256 KB]

   41 Tākitimu MB 281 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAKITIMU DISTRICT A20150001006 UNDER Section 18(1)(a) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Part Lot 1 DP 13787 (formerly Pt Tarawera 5A) NIGEL BAKER Applicant THE TRUSTEES OF THE THOMAS BAKER WHĀNAU TRUST Interested Party Hearing

7. [2016] NZEmpC 109 Dotcom v Orduna [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...proceedings under EMPC 86/2016 are Mr Dotcom’s cross-challenge to the same determination of the Authority issued on 11 March 2016 as to the matters found against him by the Authority. The allegations, admissions and denials in the pleadings likewise form the background to document disclosure issues. [6] At the heart of these proceedings are the questions of whether Mr Dotcom was the employer; and, if so, whether the individual parties were disadvantaged or dismissed unjustifiably...

8. SR v GI [2016] NZDT 1070 (17 February 2016) [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...coffee machine money and the plastics, neither of these arrangements were intended to give rise to legally binding obligations. The parties made their arrangements loosely as friends on a basis of personal trust and reciprocity, where each of them performed favours for the other and expected favours in return, without any monetary value being put on these favours or clear terms being negotiated or recorded. [9] Mr SR stated that he wanted to get back what is his because Mr GI cut hi...

9. KT v F Ltd [2024] NZDT 551 (12 June 2024) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...the purchase. Therefore, I find that F Ltd is entitled to retain the deposit. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 7. For these reasons the claim is dismissed. Referee: K Rendall Date: 12 June 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

10. 29 February Legal Aid News [pdf, 458 KB]

    ...existing appeals. Specialist report defined The definition of a specialist report for purposes of family fixed fees has been clarified to avoid doubt. In Care of Children Act matters the specialist report fixed fee is for considering a report requested by the Court under sections 132 or 133, or a Judge directed lawyer for child report. In Children, Young Persons, and their Families Act matters the specialist report fixed fee is for considering a report requested by the Court under se...