12870 items matching your search terms
Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 84 APPLICANT CQ RESPONDENT DW The Tribunal orders: DW is to pay CQ the sum of $5,980.00 on or before 10 February 2023. Reasons: 1. CQ and DW own adjoining properties in [community]. In May 2022 CQ served a fencing notice on DW. The notice indicated that CQ wanted to repair the concrete post and wire fence between their propert...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 396 APPLICANT NH Ltd RESPONDENT OZ Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. OZ Ltd must pay NH Ltd $28,437.56 by 4pm on 30 August 2023. 2. OZ Ltd’s counterclaim against NH Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicant provided weekly garden and ground maintenance services to the respondent for a property at [addr...
...the papers) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT A Leave to appeal is granted. B The approved question of law is whether the Secretary for Education is properly named as the sole respondent when the Employment Relations Authority investigates claims of the NZEI for declaratory and compliance orders for alleged breaches by the Secretary of the Primary Teachers’ Collective Agreement. C Costs are reserved. Solicitors: Crown Law Office, Wellington for Applicant Oak...
Claim No: 0677 Under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 In the matter of an adjudication claim Between Hyun Hwa Jang Claimant And Kam Po Tse First respondent And Qixing Mo Second respondent And Deng Donglin Third respondent Determination July 2006 1. Index 1. Index 1 2. Summary 1 3. The Adjudication Claim 2 4. The Dwellinghouse 3 5. The Claim 4 6. Causation 5 7. First Respondent – Kam P...
...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached information. The assessor’s report...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1309 APPLICANT Mr M Wairoa RESPONDENT Ms U Wairoa The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Mr M replaced a boundary fence between his property and his neighbor, Ms U. 2. He filed a claim in the Tribunal seeking half the cost of the fence ($282.25) plus the cost of removing a flax ($80.00). 3...
...complaint to Netsafe, Mr Z received a Case Summary from Netsafe. Mr Z was then able to, and did, issue proceedings against the three aggrieved persons in the District Court. Mr Z also applied for interim orders against the three defendants. His application for interim orders was on a without notice basis, meaning the three aggrieved persons had no knowledge of the application and were not heard by the Court before the application was determined. After initially referring the matter ba...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 127 APPLICANT KQ RESPONDENT UN The Tribunal orders: UN is ordered to pay KQ the sum of $2,300.00. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 2 June 2023. Reasons: 1) In October 2021, the applicant bought a dog from the respondent. UN is a dog breeder. The price paid was $3,000.00. At the time of the sale, the dog was 6...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1420 APPLICANT CU RESPONDENT DN Ltd trading as TT The Tribunal hereby orders that: 1. DN Ltd is to pay CU the sum of $14,872.00 on or before the 14 October 2019. 2. DN Ltd is to collect the Masport Goliath Ride on Mower from CU’s home address after the 14 October 2019. Reasons: 1. On 1 December 2017 CU...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 22 APPLICANT DT RESPONDENT BQ The Tribunal orders: 1. BQ is to pay DT $400.00 on or before 5.00pm on 8 March 2022 Reasons: 1. DT booked one night’s accommodation on [Travel website] at QW; property owned by BQ. The cost of the accommodation was $1,350.00 plus a cleaning fee of $110.00 for one night. DT claims that...