12542 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 272 APPLICANT M Ltd RESPONDENT J Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. M Ltd purchased the property at [Address 1] in September 2019 and in the following months noticed that water was leaking from the neighbouring property at [Address 2]. The director of M Ltd, MJ, investigated the leak at the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 67 APPLICANT UC RESPONDENT Council The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. UC lives on a corner section. On the other side of her fence is a footpath and near the corner is an area of vegetation which the Council refers to as a ‘build out’. UC said some of the vegetation is at least 1.8m high, which is to...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 421 APPLICANT KS APPLICANT QS RESPONDENT ZA The Tribunal orders: The Applicant’s claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The Applicants (KS and QS) and the Respondent (ZA) are neighbours. In June 2022, the property manager for ZA’s property (KZ) called ZA and told him KS and QS wished to discuss building a new...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 539 APPLICANT DC RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. DC was visiting K Ltd at about 8pm on a Sunday evening with friends. He asked the barman if he, the barman, could plug his phone in to charge, behind the bar. The barman agreed and plugged DC’s phone in. 2. At 8.20pm that night C...
...an employee again took inside upon completion, and on 12 October, he completed another 10. When he was finished the last set, he asked TT for his payment. 4. NB says TT became angry and denied that NB had welded 28 chairs. According to NB, TT claimed he welded only 24, and that this was all he would pay for. The angered NB, and he left the premises without being paid, kicking down the stack of chairs he had welded as he left. He did not believe any of the chairs were damaged. He went...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 260 APPLICANT TC RESPONDENT UMA The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. TC purchased a [vehicle] in 2018 from UMA (an unlimited company). Prior to confirming purchase of the car, he was offered unlimited free super-charging for as long as he owned the vehicle. 2. At that time, there were about 13 super-chargers...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 283 APPLICANT QH Ltd RESPONDENT BD APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: BD is to pay J Ltd $17,402.66 on or before 18 March 2024. Reasons 1. BD crashed into the large cantilever gate at the entrance to the QH Ltd premises. 2. QH Ltd and its insurer, J Ltd, claim $17,402.66 as a contribut...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 267 APPLICANT ND RESPONDENT MI Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. MI Ltd is added as the Respondent to this claim. 2. TN and SE are removed as parties to the proceedings. 3. MI Ltd are ordered to pay ND a sum of $80 by 5pm on 28 May 2024. Reasons: 1. ND files this claim seeking a full refund of $264.99 paid for a [garden kit]...
We provide advice to the Minister of Justice on matters involving miscarriages of justice. This includes applications for compensation for wrongful conviction and detention, and applications for the exercise of the Royal prerogative of mercy. From 1 July 2020, the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) came into force as an independent Crown entity to investigate possible miscarriages of justice. For more information about the CCRC and the remaining role of the Royal prerogative of mercy,...
...[2013] NZEmpC 199 [4 November 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 199 CRC 42/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for leave to file a statement of defence and cross-challenge out of time BETWEEN SEALORD GROUP LIMITED Plaintiff AND AARON PICKERING Defendant Hearing: On the papers filed by way of memoranda...