Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12922 items matching your search terms

  1. 31 October Legal Aid News [pdf, 195 KB]

    ...provider contract renewal Update on changes to the administration of legal aid Electronic signature requirements Pre-hearing matters Complying with the Court of Appeal ‘Criminal Electronic Document Protocol’ Delegation of work Legal aid forms – New installer package available for downloading Changes to the reassessment/ reconsideration process Queries? Legal aid provider contract renewal The renewal process for the new Provider Contract for Services is well under way....

  2. DA v WZ & WZW Ltd [2015] 761 (22 March 2015) [pdf, 83 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2015] NZDT 761 BETWEEN DA APPLICANT AND WZ RESPONDENT AND WZW LIMITED SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 22 March 2015 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that WZW Limited is to pay the sum of $957.00 directly to DA on or before 10 April 2015 and the claim against WZ is dismissed. Facts [1] In February of 2013 DA delivered her motorcycle to WZW Lim...

  3. GC v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 349 (11 August 2023) [pdf, 91 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 349 APPLICANT GC RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. GC purchased [brand] ear buds from Q Ltd on 7 May 2022. GC alleges the buds were faulty from when she opened the package and Q Ltd refuses to refund her money. She claims $950.00. 2. Q Ltd denies the claim and states it ha...

  4. BC v KC [2023] NZDT 625 (4 December 2023) [pdf, 115 KB]

    ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

  5. [2012] NZCA 508 CA414/2012 Moodie v The Employment Court and Strachan [pdf, 147 KB]

    ...usual disbursements. ____________________________________________________________________ REASONS OF THE COURT (Given by O’Regan P) Table of Contents Para No Introduction [1] Factual background [4] The statement of claim [8] Our approach [10] Judicial review of an Employment Court decision [11] Appeals [12] Judicial review [13] Jurisdiction to strike out [18] Grounds of review [26] Delay [29] Discrimination [34] Bias [37] Unsubstanti...

  6. KN v X Ltd [2024] NZDT 158 (7 March 2024) [pdf, 180 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 158 APPLICANT KN RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. KN states that X Ltd undertook works at the entrance of the driveway to his property. A thick steel plate was placed on the site which, KN states caused damage to the underside of his vehicle. KN seeks an order for the costs for repairing t...

  7. [2013] NZEmpC 216 Narayan v Telecom NZ Ltd [pdf, 54 KB]

    IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 216 ARC 32/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for leave to file amended statement of defence out of time BETWEEN MADHUKAR SHYAM NARAYAN Plaintiff AND TELECOM NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On documents filed on 23 October and 12 and 22 November 2013 Representatives:...

  8. DK & EK v S Ltd [2024] NZDT 359 (27 March 2024) [pdf, 194 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 359 APPLICANT DK APPLICANT EK RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. DK and EK purchased a house in [City] in April 2022. Before confirming their purchase they engaged S Ltd to undertake a pre-purchase inspection. 2. DK and EK received a written report from S Ltd. This report recommended...

  9. TU v EM [2024] NZDT 153 (10 April 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 153 APPLICANT TU RESPONDENT EM The Tribunal orders: EM is to pay $7,388.75 (incl GST) to TU on or before 1 May 2024. Reasons: 1. TU purchased a baler from EM in April 2023. He collected the baler in September 2023, and took it to be looked over by a mechanic recommended by EM. 2. The mechanic assessed the baler as requiring a num...

  10. KQ v LI [2023] NZDT 593 (6 November 2023) [pdf, 93 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 593 APPLICANT KQ RESPONDENT LI The Tribunal orders: 1. LI is to pay KQ $4500 by 27 November 2023. 2. KQ will make the car available for LI to uplift when the full sum of $4500 has been paid to her. 3. The bank account for payment is [redacted]. Procedural matter: 1. Referee Meyer first dealt with this claim in a heari...