12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 507 APPLICANT MT RESPONDENT IN The Tribunal orders: • IN is to pay the sum of $1311.00 to MT on or before 23 July 2024. The counter-claim is dismissed. • MT is to engage a fencing contractor to undertake work as per the quotation dated 16 May 2024 by B Ltd (or the quotation dated 22 May 2024 except that the work shall be carri...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2016] NZDT 914 BETWEEN DW APPLICANT AND VD RESPONDENT Date of Order: 11 May 2016 Referee: Referee Savage ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that VD is to pay DW $2866.55 by 1 June 2016. Facts [1] DW purchased a boat from VD in September 2010 for the sum of $34,000, after seeing the advertisement on Trade Me and then phoning VD with questions about the boat. DW did not inspect t...
...floor Seabridge House 110 Featherston Street Wellington I PO Box 5022 Lambton Quay Wellington Tel: (04) 4993666 Fax: (04) 499 3676 Waitangi Tribunal Division Department of Justice Newsletter ISSN 0114-717X Number II August 1991 NEW CLAIMS REGISTERED WAl203 Claimants: Tuirenga Mokomoko for the Mokomoko family of the Whakatohea tribe Concerning: Statutory pardon for Mokomok9 .convicted and executed for alleged involvement in murdering mission ary Volkner Date of regist...
...Dated 8 June 2021 REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Self-represented Complainant: Self-represented Adviser: Self-represented 2 PRELIMINARY [1] Mr Malcolm, the adviser, acted for TI, the complainant, on an immigration application, but was tardy in making the application and failed to keep the complainant properly informed of progress. More seriously, he misled her as to when the application would be made. [2] A complaint to the Immigration Advisers Autho...
...considered by the Courts, ultimately the Supreme Court, which on [Date] dismissed her application for leave to appeal. [6] On [Date], the Body Corporate filed a memorandum with the Tribunal to update the Body Corporate’s claim against the owners and requested an evaluation conference. The amended claim filed included further levies that had fallen due and had not been paid. [7] Two months later, on [Date], [HGF] informed the firm that the owners had paid $[Amount], which rep...
...Mr R Feist for Mangaporou Trust RESERVED DECISION ON JURISDICTION By direction dated 13 October 2003, 131 Aotea MB 198-201, counsel were invited to make submissions on the issue of jurisdiction concerning claims by David Churton Jnr ("the Applicant") for stock losses. Submissions have now been received in accordance with that direction. Submissions on behalf of the applicant Mr Mahuika, counsel for the Applicant, submitted that the orders sought by his client fell within t...
...Māori Land Court processes maybe equally criticised for the length of time they take. But to ensure fairness, a little delay is what may be neccessary to achieve the right result, namely the utilisation of Māori land by owners and their whanau. Application [2] On 14 December 2010, the Māori Land Court received an application regarding the Māori freehold land block Rotokautuku 1J1 from the Māori Trustee. The application was made under sections 220, 215 and 222(4). Essentially...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1414 APPLICANT KI T/A KD RESPONDENT KW The Tribunal orders: 1. KW is to pay to KI t/a KD the sum of $785.60 on or before Friday, 31 May 2019. Reasons 1. KI t/a KD was contracted to drill and install three anchors for a block wall in a property development being undertaken by KW. 2. Three anchors were installed...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2012] NZHRRT 20 Reference No. HRRT 022/2011 IN THE MATTER OF A CLAIM UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN MARCUS JAMES STEELE PLAINTIFF AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SALISBURY SCHOOL DEFENDANT AT NELSON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms J Grant MNZM, Member Ms S Ineson QSM, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr Steele in person Mr DM O’Neill for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 16 December 20...
1 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 515 APPLICANT NB RESPONDENT CF & MF The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 7 October 2020 NB signed a contract to purchase a property from CF and MF for $375,000. On 29 October NB’s solicitor wrote to the vendor’s solicitor that the LIM had shown there were unconsented works on the property and the building report noted a potenti...