Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12922 items matching your search terms

  1. AFJ Ltd v ZUM [2013] NZDT 305 (20 September 2013) [pdf, 53 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2012] NZDT 305 BETWEEN AFJ Ltd APPLICANT AND JKB Insurance Ltd APPLICANT’S INSURER AND ZUM RESPONDENT Date of Order: 20 September 2013 Referee: Referee MacPherson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZUM is to pay to JKB Ltd the sum of $6,511.14 by 5pm Friday, 4 October 2013. Facts [1] On 10 July 2012, sheep owned by AFJ Ltd at [ad...

  2. SH v NS [2022] NZDT 102 (26 August 2022) [pdf, 196 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 102 APPLICANT SH RESPONDENT NS The Tribunal orders: 1. NS is to pay $4,000.00 to SH on or before 17 September 2022. Reasons: 2. SH won a [online auction website] auction for a van from NS and paid a $4,000.00 deposit the next day as per their verbal agreement. There were delays in SH organising flights to pick up the...

  3. [2016] NZEmpC 176 Radius Residential Care Ltd v The New Zealand Nurses Organisation Inc and Others [pdf, 97 KB]

    ...Radius Residential Care Ltd (Radius), seeks an order for costs against the first and second defendants and four named third defendants (Janet Franklin, Elizabeth Packer, Polly Bell and Donna Mather). The plaintiff has formally discontinued its claims against the remaining third defendants so that there are now no issues of costs in respect of them. [2] The plaintiff seeks costs from these defendants in the sum of $32,000 and an order for reimbursement of its hearing fees of...

  4. U Ltd v J Ltd [2024] NZHDT 88 (30 January 2024) [pdf, 99 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 88 APPLICANT U Ltd RESPONDENT J Ltd The Tribunal orders: J Ltd is to refund U Ltd $17,100 on or before 1 March 2024. Reasons 1. U Ltd admits it contracted to purchase a caravan for $143,0000 from J Ltd on 23 June 2023. U Ltd paid a deposit of $28,600 on 26 June 2023. 2. A number of customisations were requested, and these were...

  5. FQ & TZ v QM [2022] NZDT 77 (8 February 2022) [pdf, 105 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 77 APPLICANTS FQ & TZ RESPONDENT QM The Tribunal orders: QM is to pay $599.00 to FQ and TZ on or before 8 March 2022. Reasons 1. In April 2020, FQ and TZ booked the services of QM as a photographer for their wedding, which was originally scheduled for November 2021. They paid a 20% deposit of $599.00, $2999....

  6. [2020] NZEmpC 102 Pfenniger v Blume [pdf, 164 KB]

    ...ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 102 EMPC 273/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to serve a defendant overseas BETWEEN KATYA PFENNIGER Plaintiff AND GORDON BLUME First Defendant AND RONALD BRAUN Second Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appe...

  7. NI v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 407 (4 April 2024) [pdf, 200 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 407 APPLICANT NI RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NI engaged Q Ltd to move his belongings between two houses within [City]. 2. Q Ltd came and moved NI’s belongings and charged him $945.00 for four and half hours work. 3. NI paid Q Ltd, but now seeks $710.00. This is comprised of a...

  8. Trustees Executors Ltd as trustee for the Simpson Family Trust v Wellington City Council [pdf, 42 KB]

    ...[7] The claimant and the first, second, fifth and seventh respondents made submissions. SUBSTANTIAL MERIT Limitation [8] The claimant was put on notice that there would be a defence based on limitation in November 2005 when an application was made to Adjudicator Green to strike out the claim filed under the 2002 Act. The application was declined after submissions that a full factual assessment required a hearing. No new material was provided at this hearing. [9...

  9. NO v UM [2023] NZDT 629 (21 November 2023) [pdf, 187 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 629 APPLICANT NO RESPONDENT UM The Tribunal orders: UM is to pay $900.00 to NO by no later than 20th December 2023. Reasons: 1. UM engaged NO, who operates a gardening services business trading as “BN”, to undertake gardening work on her property. She sent photos to NO showing the section and the tidying up work that was requ...

  10. T Ltd v ND [2024] NZDT 739 (22 August 2024) [pdf, 187 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 739 APPLICANT T Ltd RESPONDENT ND The Tribunal orders: ND is to pay T Ltd the sum of $2,586.25 on or before 11 September 2024. Reasons 1. ND decided to sell her house by auction using the services of QX of T Ltd. QX is a director and represented T Ltd at the hearing. Very much at the eleventh hour, ND had a change of heart an...