Search Results

1. Broome v Auckland Council [2017] NZWHT Auckland 1 [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...488. 27 [121] I do not consider that the Council’s 17 January 2006 letter to ASA was a generic request for information. Its purpose was to decline ASA’s request for approval of Dampfix as a waterproof membrane. It stated that until the requested information was received and satisfied the Council’s requirements, Dampfix was not approved. [122] Mr Turner has given evidence of the Council’s attitude to LAMs. There is independent evidence to show that during 2005 and...

2. LCRO 72/2020 ZW v CB (29 September 2020) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...contents suffered damage. [3] The cost of the water damage was estimated to exceed $100,000. 2 [4] The insurer of the home refused to provide cover. The insurance company providing cover for the construction work would not respond to Mr ZW’s requests to provide cover. [5] Mr ZW also encountered difficulties with the scaffolding company that had erected the scaffolding. The company refused to repair the damaged scaffolding unless Mr ZW paid them a sum of $5,510.80, together...

3. [2011] NZEmpc 122 Chen v BancLogix Limited [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...technical skills are limited. I found stressed in handling technical work. I even feel harder in handling interpersonal disputes. I feel tired both physically and psychologically, and I am unable to continue to work for BancLogix anymore. I request to resign from the work in BancLogix. Thank you. Frank Chen The disadvantage grievance [10] Mr Liu replied to Mr Chen’s resignation e-mail saying that he would still like Mr Chen to return to the office and explain his beh...

4. OT & TT v TD [2022] NZDT 271 (20 December 2022) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...fence? b. If not, was there an adequate fence? c. If not, was appropriate notice given under the Fencing Act 1978? d. Does TD have to pay any, or all, of the amount claimed? Was there an agreement about building the fence? 6. A contract is formed when there is an agreement between the parties, or where there is a meeting of the minds between them. Often this relies on an offer, and acceptance of that offer. There must be certainty about the terms that have been agreed to. 7. OT...

5. IW v CZ [2024] NZDT 498 (29 May 2024) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...in touch with her (since her details were not recorded on the TCR). KF confirmed that she did not know CZ prior to this incident and said she had been taking her daughter to sports practice that day and her daughter was wearing a [sports club] uniform. KF was later contacted by members of the club telling her that CZ had provided the photo taken at the scene to the Club’s Facebook page to request assistance with identification of the witness/es and contact details. 17. The above ex...

6. LCRO 222/2018 TE v KT and RG (18 March 2019) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...has the capability to adjourn its process. There may be unfairness to both parties to some extent, but the Committee’s statutory jurisdiction is retained through the civil process so that the public interest is not neglected. [24] Mr TE’s request for an urgent determination is misguided. Mr TE accepts his NZLS file is complex. This Office cannot conduct a review or determine the substance of a complaint until a Committee has completed its enquiry, albeit further information...

7. Harland v Prentice - Mana Ahuriri Incorporated Society (2017) 57 Takitimu MB 1 (57 Takitimu 1) [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...negotiations; and by agreement dated 19 December 2013, agreed, in principle, that Ahuriri Hapū and the Crown were willing to enter into a deed of settlement. 3 [9] On 19 December 2013, the Crown and MAI signed an Agreement in Principle which formed the basis for the Ahuriri Hapū Deed of Settlement which was initialled on 19 June 2015 and signed on 2 November 2016. 4 [10] Ahuriri Hapū have, since the initialling of the deed of settlement, by a majority of 76 per cent, ratifie...

8. Privacy Act 1993 and Privacy Act 2020

   ...Principle 11 – Privacy Act 1993, ss 85(4) and 87 Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Crampton [2015] NZHRRT 35 (29 July 2015) HIJ v RST and UVW [2013] NZHRRT 41 Geary v Accident Compensation Corporation [2013] NZHRRT 34 Burden of proof – terms of request – information the subject of the request – duty to establish – Privacy Act 1993, ss 40 and 85 Reekie v Roberts [2013] NZHRRT 7 Burden of proof – unauthorised disclosure of personal information – loss of documents from depar...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Human rights >
   3. Decisions - Index

9. Doria v Diamond Laser Medispa Taupo Limited & Ors [2025] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 335 KB]

   ...accordingly notice is issued in reliance upon that Act. The employer looks forward to you providing your notice of the date of return so it can manage your absence with a relief employee. [11] In response, at 9.26 pm that evening, Ms Doria’s mother requested that the nominated early carer leave be cancelled, that a letter advising of a proposal for early primary carer leave be sent to Ms Doria and her mother, and a work-related risk assessment be conducted by an independent profe...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 192 Sayers v S B McPherson Holdings Ltd [pdf, 71 KB]

    ...report the accident to his employer, the respondent. In essence, he alleged that he understood the respondent’s policy was that he did not need to report minor accidents and that he had discretion as to what should or should not be reported. He claimed to have formed this view based on what he said was ‘common knowledge’ and on certain instructions that had been given to him by his predecessor, Mr Graham Rubick. [8] After an investigation, Mr Sayers was informed on 17 Novem...