11447 items matching your search terms
...were reasonably fit for purpose. 25. For these reasons I find that BG has not proved her claim and it is dismissed. Referee: K Johnson Date: 02 September 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...
...contract which was made in writing; is clearly expressed to be at owner’s risk; and is signed by the parties. 9. For the avoidance of doubt, I accept: a. “in writing” and “signed” in this case refer to completion of an online booking form, which was completed by IC’s wife ND on the family’s behalf; b. for the purposes of the CCLA I am satisfied the steps necessary to complete the online booking in the sense that items are ‘written’ or ‘signed’ doe...
...therefore made for one week of rent. Are EN and JE entitled to be refunded the full amount of the bond? 8. The parties agree that it was EN who paid the money that was used for the bond. EN showed that it was noted on the tenancy bond lodgement form that he had contributed $2,720 and his partner had contributed $2,720, however, TT and EH were noted on the bond lodgement of having not paid the bond. EN said that as he had paid all the bond, it should have been transferred to him...
...[Country 2 for SINI? (c) What is the appropriate remedy? Did SI require an accompanying person to travel in business class with him under the travel insurance policy? 5. The general law of contract applies. A legally binding contract is formed where both parties intend to contract on agreed terms. For a contract to be enforceable the terms of the contract need to CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 be certain and clear. Once the terms of a contract are agreed, both parties a...
...obligations from 21 August 2024, and they therefore claim $3,667.42 as the outstanding sum owed by KE. 3. KE accepted that due to changes in his personal circumstances he was unable to continue to meet rent payments, and accepted he did owe money to his former flatmates. 4. The issues to be resolved are: a. Is KE in breach of his obligation to pay shared rent? b. If so, is $3,667.42 the amount of rent arrears owed by him? c. Are DU and MM entitled to $3,667.42 as claimed?
...[2025] NZDT 164 APPLICANT QX RESPONDENT HC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Background 1. The adjournment order dated 21 March 2025 sets out the background to QX’s claim. 2. Both parties provided additional information for the second hearing on 15 April 2024, as discussed below. 3. I apologise to the parties for the delay in releasing this decision. Findings 4. It is important to re-iterate the legal position in respect of private sa...
...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2025] NZDT 274 APPLICANT TH RESPONDENT ET The Tribunal orders: ET is to pay $850.00 to TH on or before 25 July 2025. The bank account for payment is on the Disputes Tribunal Claim Form. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. ET purchased a flat immediately adjacent to a property owned by TH. TH only occupies his property intermittently. The property ET purchased had previously been vacant. Prior to settlem...
...date, M Ltd also paid a sum of $2,777.25 to P Ltd in error. That money was supposed to be paid to another third party that M Ltd owed money to. It was paid into P Ltd’s bank account. 3. M Ltd contacted P Ltd soon after the error was noticed and requested that the money be repaid back to M Ltd. P Ltd refused to return the money. 4. M Ltd contacted its bank and paid for a recovery request which was actioned by M Ltd’s bank. That request from the bank was declined. 5. M Ltd...
...contain any promise by KT and SC to repair the guttering. However, KI requested in an email “could (we) please have the gutters emptied and the disconnected one repaired”. BC, the solicitor for the vendors, advised that KT and SC agreed to perform that work if the agreement was confirmed as unconditional. The contract went unconditional in approximately one week of KT and SC accepting to do that work. 4. BI and KI said the guttering was not repaired to a suitable standard. They pro...
...conflict was their different perceptions of who was responsible for individual patients. Ms Clear believed that patients were “hers.” From Mrs Parata’s point of view, generally the patients were cared for by a team of midwives unless one requested a particular midwife to care for her. This led to mutual antagonism. [25] Midwives who had worked at the Tokoroa Maternity Ward from the 1970s onwards gave their views about this relationship and the working environment. Whi...