12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1448 APPLICANT SD RESPONDENT SN Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: SN Ltd is to deliver to SD, at a suitable pre-arranged time, the bedframe and mattress they took from her property in February, on or before 15 May 2019; OR If the bedframe and mattress are not returned to SD by 15 May 2019, $905.00 becomes payable by...
LCRO 134/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 2 BETWEEN Mr AJ of Auckland Applicant AND Ms ZQ of Australia Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] At the beginning of July 2009, the Applicant was instructed by Mr VC to...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
...are based on income and household composition. Under IRR, HNZC tenants on low incomes pay no more than 25% of their income in rent. [3] In each year from 2000 to 2006 Mr Holmes applied for and was granted income- related rent. In support of each application he was required to submit (and did submit) an income statement for the previous 52 weeks. These statements were issued by Work and Income of the Ministry of Social Development (MSD), the agency responsible for making social welfare...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 477 APPLICANT EI APPLICANT OI RESPONDENT TS RESPONDENT NS The Tribunal orders: 1. NS is added as a respondent to this claim. 2. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 3. The applicants, EI and OI, purchased a house at [Address] (“the house”) from the respondents, TS and NS on 11 January 2023. 4. With...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 775 APPLICANT KD & DF RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: L Ltd is to pay KD and DF the sum of $28,761.50 immediately. Reasons 1. This was a claim by the applicant for the sum of $28,761.50, being a remedial repair cost required to their home, after the respondents had undertaken recladding restoration work (“the work”)....
...CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 BETWEEN MS BIRKENHEAD of Hastings Applicant AND MS HOLYWELL of Rotorua Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION [1] The Applicant is Ms Birkenhead who sought a review of a decision by a...
IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-00012/2019 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN N M and M M as trustees of the C M TRUST Applicants AND EARTHQUAKE COMMISSION First Respondent (Claim Withdrawn) AND TOWER INSURANCE LIMITED Second Respondent Date: 29 March 2021 Appearances: On the papers __________________________________________________________________...
...274 parties. Mr Whittfield was also advised that the Brabants were on the Court records (jointly) as the Counsel for WML, and that as liquidator Mr Whittfield needed to resolve the question of legal representation (if any) with respect to the claims for costs. 2 6. Mr Whittfield has requested that this Court be advised that he has been appointed liquidator and that all further correspondence should be addressed to him (Mr Whittfield indicated he would also personally c...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 588 APPLICANT IB RESPONDENT TT The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In March 2021, IB (the buyer) entered into a sale and purchase agreement to purchase a property at [address], in a private sale from TT (the seller) and his wife. The buyer got a building inspection done before purchase, though not a specialised...