Search Results

1. BV v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 677 (6 September 2024) [pdf, 124 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 677 APPLICANT BV RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: U Ltd is to pay BV $24,550.00 within 28 days. Reasons [1] BV claims that U Ltd, represented by CS, is obliged to cover him under the insurance policy that he holds with [an insurance provider] for the value of his [Car] that was irreparably damaged in a crash. U Ltd has declined to p...

2. H Trustees Ltd v PT [2024] NZDT 512 (12 June 2024) [pdf, 249 KB]

   Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 512 APPLICANT person or organisation making the original claim H Trustees Ltd RESPONDENT person or organisation originally claimed against PT Result of application for rehearing: Rehearing Refused The Order of 13 January 2021 stands. Reasons for decision: 1. I set out the procedural background of this matter, as it is relevant to my decision...

3. TU v GX [2024] NZDT 373 (4 June 2024) [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...GX failed to make herself available for the hearing. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Referee: John Hogan ` Date: 4 June 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

4. GI v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 452 (27 June 2024) [pdf, 197 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 452 APPLICANT GI RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. D Ltd is to pay GI $95.00 on or before 18 July 2024. This is calculated as follows: Refund of deposit to GI $300.00 Refund of overpaid rent to GI $ 95.00 Less compensation for cleaning and carpet replacement $300.00 Balance owed to GI $ 95.00 2. The claim by...

5. B Ltd v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 482 (17 May 2024) [pdf, 176 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 482 APPLICANT B Ltd RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: M Ltd is to pay the sum of $10,863.00 to B Ltd on or before 31 May 2024. Reasons: 1. This dispute arises apparently as a result of email hacking, more formally known as business email compromise (BEC) fraud. On 14 August 2023, B Ltd issued an invoice to M Ltd for $24,725.00 for...

6. Te Manutukutuku Issue 24-25 [pdf, 5.4 MB]

   ...Ikawhenua Murupara Nov 22-26 Wai 143 Taranaki Taranaki Nov 29- Wai 45 Muriwhenua Auckland? Dec 2 Dec 6-10 Mar 1994 Wai 55 Te Whanganui a Oroto Napier Wai 55 Te Whanganuia Oroto Napier Waitangi Tribunal Reports on Maori Development Corporation Claim The Waitangi Tribunal granted urgency to the hearing of claims against the Crown's proposed sale of its 13 million Maori Development Corporation (MDC) shares. The Tribunal reports that the claimants' common concern is...

7. SD v O [2023] NZDT 237 (18 August 2023) [pdf, 197 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 237 APPLICANT L APPLICANT SD RESPONDENT O The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 2. Sometime in August or September 2022 SD said he was towing a tandem trailer behind his small truck, driving between [Town 1] and [Town 2] when he claims a tyre on his trailer was damaged as a result of...

8. IB v IY [2016] NZDT 1407 (25 Feburary 2016) [pdf, 96 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2016] NZDT 1407 APPLICANT IB RESPONDENT IY RESPONDENT'S INSURER JB Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: IY is to pay the sum of $1,846.44 to IB on or before 10 March 2016. Reasons: 1. On 14 September 2015, there was a collision between IB’s car and IY’s car on C Place, [Suburb]. At the time of the impact, both...

9. LX v O Ltd [2023] NZDT 619 (9 November 2023) [pdf, 112 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 619 APPLICANT LX RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by LX against O Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. LX owns land on which high voltage power lines run across part of it. LX now brings a claim against O Ltd for $30,000.00. 2. The issues to be resolved are: (a) Did O Ltd breach the agreement? (b) If not, was O Ltd n...

10. ED & KD v NQ [2023] NZDT 701 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 228 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 701 APPLICANT ED APPLICANT KD RESPONDENT NQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. ED and KD and NQ own adjoining properties at [Town]. Currently there is an area of approximately 25 metres on the boundary that is unfenced. ED and KD approached NQ with fencing proposals. As they did not get a definitive respon...