12542 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 511 APPLICANT MZ RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: X Ltd is to pay MZ $1,414.00 on or before 13 November 2023. Reasons 1. MZ bought return tickets for her parents to fly to [Country] from the website operated by X Ltd. The website asked her to enter the first name and then the last name of each parent for the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1673 APPLICANT QM RESPONDENT QU Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. QU Ltd is to pay $1,711.08 to QM on or before 31 October 2021. 2. Ownership of the [phone] reverts to QU Ltd. 3. QM is to return the [phone] to QU Ltd immediately at her cost. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 4. On 2 August 2021, QM (using the name KM)...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 647 APPLICANT DL Ltd RESPONDENT DX The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. DL Ltd entered into an agreement to build a custom vanity for DX. After the vanity was installed and the plumbing had been completed, including the sink installation, the top vanity draw would not close. DL Ltd took the top draw away, made s...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 279 APPLICANT CD Ltd RESPONDENT CO Ltd The Tribunal orders: CO Ltd is to pay $9152.91 to CD Ltd on or before 24 November 2022. Reasons 1. In late 2021, over several months, CD Ltd provided trucking services to CO Ltd across 12 construction sites, removing materials including soil, clay, rubbish and rocks and tipping them...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 53 APPLICANT HH RESPONDENT NC APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: NC is to pay J Ltd $2,858.19 on or before Wednesday 20 March 2024. Reasons: 1. On 25 January 2023, there was a collision between HH’s [ute] and NC’s campervan on a bridge on the [highway]. The collision occurred when NC tried to move from t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 431 APPLICANT FU RESPONDENT KT SECOND RESPONDENT G Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In January 2021 FU purchased a car from or through G Ltd, the purchase was financed with a loan from [finance company]. After about a week, he discovered oil leaking, and took it to KT, who said...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 56 APPLICANT LI Ltd RESPONDENT TC as Trustee of TC Family Trust The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. LI Ltd carried out preliminary work for TC (as Trustee) for a large home renovation project. She confirmed with LI Ltd in September 2022 that she had decided to engage their services as the builders for her h...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 245 APPLICANT BF RESPONDENT XX The Tribunal orders: XX is to pay the sum of $636.69 to BF on or before Thursday 8 June 2023. Reasons: 1. On 17 February 2022, BF (the head tenant) entered into a flat-sharing agreement with XX (the flatmate). The flatmate paid a bond of $250.00, and two weeks’ rent in advance a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1406 APPLICANT KS RESPONDENT OT Ltd RESPONDENT OT Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. KS rented a storage unit from OT Ltd. On 29 May 2020 the premises were burgled. KS’s unit, and 22 others, were broken into. Some personal items including a watch, shoes and golf clubs were taken from KS...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 89 APPLICANT OS RESPONDENT E Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 2. OS is seeking compensation from E Ltd for failing to deliver goods within a reasonable time. The claim is disputed by E Ltd. 3. The issue for determination by the Tribunal is whether OS is entitled to compensation for th...