Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12922 items matching your search terms

  1. KB v KP [2023] NZDT 184 (13 June 2023) [pdf, 104 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 184 APPLICANT KB RESPONDENT KP The Tribunal orders: 1. KP is to pay KB $7,700.00 on or before 21 July 2023. 2. U are requested to release the [electric mountain bike] to KB on production of a copy of this order. 3. Once KP has paid the $7,700.00 to KB, KP may arrange to collect the bike from KB. Reasons: 1. K...

  2. T v Mudaliar [2015] NZIACDT 79 (06 August 2015) [pdf, 241 KB]

    ...where the applicant worked. He explained the discrepancies in terms of typing errors, the employer’s limited English language skills, and said the relevant ANZSCO Unit Group 4116 (411611 Massage Therapist) was consistent with beauty services. He claimed many tasks in the Massage Therapist description did not relate to “any form of therapeutic massage”. He concluded “as a massage therapist our client performs the duties of both a beauty and massage therapist”. [5.8] Immigration...

  3. King & Bailey [2011] NZWHT Auckland 2 [pdf, 92 KB]

    ...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached information. The assessor’s report date...

  4. NC v HU [2023] NZDT 692 (21 December 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 692 APPLICANT NC RESPONDENT HU The Tribunal orders: HU is to pay NC $1,000.00 on or before 31 January 2024. Reasons Introduction 1. At the end of July 2023, NC moved into a flat with HU. HU was the head tenant. In or around 26 August 2023, NC moved out of the flat. 2. NC seeks the return of his bond of $1,000.00. 3. The issues to be...

  5. TT v D Ltd & TC [2024] NZDT 488 (25 June 2024) [pdf, 171 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 488 APPLICANT TT RESPONDENT D Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT TC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In September 2023, TT purchased a tenanted two-bedroom apartment with a carpark in [suburb] from TC for $29,000.00 at an auction held by D Ltd. TT was informed by the tenants during the pre-settlement ins...

  6. [2025] NZIACDT 01 – ZJ v Liu (13 January 2025) [pdf, 158 KB]

    ...WeChat text by ZA (the agent) who claimed to represent employers needing workers for recovery work following floods. Mr Liu replied quoting a fee of $800 for each application. [6] Mr Liu then provided the agent with a link to a questionnaire and requested that each applicant fill in their personal information. The complainant completed the questionnaire on 5 March 2023. [7] RM, an associate of the agent, provided a file of supporting documents concerning the complainant to Mr...

  7. AFT v Tower Insurance Ltd [2022] CEIT-2022-0001 [pdf, 271 KB]

    ...DECISION OF MEMBER FLASZYNSKI ON A PRELIMINARY ISSUE DATED: 18 JULY 2022 __________________________________________________________________________ [1] This is a decision on a preliminary issue: whether the Limitation Act 2010 applies to a claim made under the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 in respect of an insurance contract? Background [2] The Applicants, MA and GA, are the policyholders and trustees of the AFT (the Trust). GA is 92 years old. Sadly, MA passed away during the ti...

  8. CJ v XL LCRO 221 / 2010 (1 July 2011) [pdf, 104 KB]

    ...221/2010 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 2 BETWEEN MR CJ of Auckland Applicant AND MS XL of Hamilton Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] This review can be disposed of readily with regard to the conduct...

  9. BE v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 364 (30 May 2024) [pdf, 168 KB]

    ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

  10. Pryazhnikov v New Zealand Police [2024] NZHRRT 49 [pdf, 471 KB]

    ...his right to live in Australia was linked to his employment. [2] On 25 June 2018, Mr Pryazhnikov was the subject of a family harm complaint made to the New Zealand Police (Police). On 9 July 2018, Mr Pryazhnikov made an information privacy request about that complaint. [3] On 30 July 2018, Police refused his request in its entirety. Mr Pryazhnikov claims that refusal, as well as other actions of Police, have interfered with his privacy. BACKGROUND [4] In mid-2018, Mr Pryazh...