12542 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 442 APPLICANT DM RESPONDENT CI SECOND RESPONDENT QI The Tribunal orders: 1. CI is to pay $2,120.25 to DM on or before 12 July 2024. 2. The claim against QI is dismissed. REASONS 3. DM offered to lend his [car] to CI for the period between 24 January 2024 – 26 February 2024 while DM was away [overseas]. CI had moved...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 219 BETWEEN AF APPLICANT AND ZU Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT AND ZUZ Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 8 May 2013 Referee: Referee Tunnicliffe ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim by AF, the applicants, for a refund of $698.17 is dismissed. AF are to pay $703.69 to ZUZ Ltd on or before 20 May 2013. Facts [1] During the hearing the correct respondent...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 29 APPLICANT KC and UJ RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: X Ltd is to pay the sum of $125.00 to UJ and KC on or before 20 February 2023. Reasons 1. KC and UJ purchased a new-build property in February 2021 from X Ltd, the developer. Within the first few months they noticed some defects and notified one of X Ltd’s di...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 65 APPLICANT ST RESPONDENT PS Ltd The Tribunal orders: PS Ltd is to pay the sum of $359.73 to ST by no later than 31 March 2023. Reasons: 1. ST and his family used a buggy in an [off-road excursion] with PS Ltd in September 2022. ST signed a waiver that he would be liable if causing damage to the buggy. 2...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 344 APPLICANT TT RESPONDENT JN APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by TT and J Ltd against JN is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 20 June 2023 TT was driving her [vehicle] on the road between [Town 1] and [Town 2] when she came across a group of at least 12 cows on the road. TT pulled her...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 598 APPLICANT NQ RESPONDENT T Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: NQ is to pay $1328.83 to T Ltd on or before 6 September 2024; and The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. NQ and T Ltd’s driver, Mr C, were involved in a minor motor vehicle collision while driving on the southern moto...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 396 APPLICANT NH Ltd RESPONDENT OZ Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. OZ Ltd must pay NH Ltd $28,437.56 by 4pm on 30 August 2023. 2. OZ Ltd’s counterclaim against NH Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicant provided weekly garden and ground maintenance services to the respondent for a property at [addr...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 7 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1313 APPLICANT NA RESPONDENT OI, BX, DI and KI as trustees of the OI Trust APPLICANT’S INSURER ABC Ltd RESPONDENT’S INSURER XYZ Ltd The Tribunal orders: OI, BX, DI and KI as the trustees of the OI Trust are to pay $2,066.59 to NA on or before 15 March 2021. Reasons: 1. NA owns a property...
...services, and then measure those findings against the professional code. The complaint [5] The Registrar’s statement of complaint put forward the following background as the basis for the complaint: [5.1] Immigration New Zealand received an application for a visitor’s visa from an applicant (the applicant). Mr Bharani was listed on the visa application form as the person who provided immigration advice; he had completed a declaration to that effect. [5.2] When Immigration New...
...statement of reply on the plaintiff and any other party. [2] By memorandum dated 16 January 2019 Serco New Zealand Ltd (Serco) has sought an extension of time for filing its statement of reply until 4pm on Friday 8 February 2019. The grounds of the request are that Serco was not served with a copy of the second amended statement of claim until Thursday 13 December 2018 with the result the statement of reply fell due for filing and service by 16 January 2019. As service occurred just p...