12922 items matching your search terms
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 660 APPLICANT CU APPLICANT LU RESPONDENT QD Limited The Tribunal orders: 1. QD Limited is to pay CU and LU $13,725.25 on or before 18 September 2024. 2. Payment is to be by way of direct credit to account number [redacted]. Reasons: 1. CU and LU engaged QD Limited to concrete their driveway with coloured concrete. The colour was unsatisfa
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 669 APPLICANT YT RESPONDENT CU Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. CU Limited (the manager) was the property manager for a rental property in [Suburb] purchased by YT (the landlord) in May 2016. In June 2023, the landlord decided to sell the property and the tenants were given 90 days’ notice to vacate. On 15 Se...
...she applied for work with the ICC he had only recently dismissed her for not having invited him to a social event, for being a Nazi sympathiser, and for falsifying her resumé. She had already raised her personal grievance and had lodged her claim with the Authority. It was submitted it would be absurd to suggest that she would have invited subsequent employers to speak to Mr Katavich in those circumstances. (d) Further, there had been evidence before the Authority in th...
...the Weathertight Homes Tribunal, PA McConnell Date of Decision: 8 July 2009 Background The Speirs Family Trust filed applied for a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under s 49 of the Act for a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria. This review was based on the Chief Executive’s decision that the dwelling was not built within ten years immediately before the day on which the claim was brought – that ten year period...
...Easthope v Accident Compensation Corporation [2023] NZACC 158. 2 Background [2] On 17 May 1986, Mr Easthope suffered an accident while playing rugby league. It appears that this accident involved him being spear-tackled to the ground. [3] The claim registration date recorded in the Corporation’s system is 23 March 1989. The Corporation’s records show that it made a lump sum payment to Mr Easthope in 1989, based on an 8% whole person impairment. The Corporation also fun...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 482 APPLICANT B Ltd RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: M Ltd is to pay the sum of $10,863.00 to B Ltd on or before 31 May 2024. Reasons: 1. This dispute arises apparently as a result of email hacking, more formally known as business email compromise (BEC) fraud. On 14 August 2023, B Ltd issued an invoice to M Ltd for $24,725.00 for...
...the contractual (and possibly tortious) duties owed to Mr Gunji by S J Brentnall Limited and therefore he has no liability to the Auckland City Council as assignee of the claims made. 2.8 I have reserved costs for further submission as I was requested. 3. The Adjudication Claim 3.1 The adjudication claim commenced with an application dated 9 July 2003 by Kiyomi Gunji as owner of 22 Vale Road, St Heliers, Auckland, being an application under s9 of the Weathertight Homes R...
...[2012] NZACA 11; Stewart v ACC [2012] NZACA 14; and Chalecki v ACC [2012] NZACA 15 &16; all decisions and review decisions were made under the 2001 Act and the right of appeal given to the District Court. Judge Beattie refused the Corporation’s request to transfer Chalecki out of the Authority because irrespective of the Act applied by the Corporation or 5 [15] With respect to questions of law, the principles extracted from the relevant authorities summarised by Cadenhea...
...GX failed to make herself available for the hearing. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Referee: John Hogan ` Date: 4 June 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 53 APPLICANT HI RESPONDENT TN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] HI purchased from TN a 2004 Ford Falcon which, HI claims, was found after the sale to have substantial defects. HI alleges that TN misrepresented the condition of the vehicle, and claims compensation for repairs and resulting...