Search Results

1. [2020] NZEmpC 129 ANZ Sky Tours Ltd T/A ANZ Sky Tours v Wei [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...ORAL JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M E PERKINS Introduction [1] This judgment deals with a collateral proceeding to a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) dated 21 June 2018.1 The judgment deals with an application by the plaintiff ANZ Sky Tours against the defendant Ms Wei for declarations that she is in contempt and imposing substantial fines against her. 1 Wei v ANZ Sky Tours Ltd t...

2. BH v MW Ltd [2023] NZDT 35 (28 March 2023) [pdf, 198 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 35 APPLICANT BH RESPONDENT MW Ltd The Tribunal orders: MW Ltd is to pay $1,875.00 to BH on or before 21 April 2023. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. After email exchanges and a visit to the premises, in September 2020, BH and IB booked [Venue] (operated by MW Ltd) for their wedding on 7 January 2023. The contracted pr...

3. KG v TM [2020] NZDT 1416 (12 August 2020) [pdf, 213 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1416 APPLICANT KG RESPONDENT TM APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) LMN Ltd The Tribunal orders: TM is to pay $4380.37 to LMN Ltd on or before 2 September 2020; and the counter-claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. KG and TM were the drivers involved in a minor motor vehicle collision as KG was turning left...

4. [2016] NZEmpC 176 Radius Residential Care Ltd v The New Zealand Nurses Organisation Inc and Others [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...Radius Residential Care Ltd (Radius), seeks an order for costs against the first and second defendants and four named third defendants (Janet Franklin, Elizabeth Packer, Polly Bell and Donna Mather). The plaintiff has formally discontinued its claims against the remaining third defendants so that there are now no issues of costs in respect of them. [2] The plaintiff seeks costs from these defendants in the sum of $32,000 and an order for reimbursement of its hearing fees of...

5. TQ & BC v B Transport [2023] NZDT 441 (30 August 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 441 APPLICANT TQ and BC RESPONDENT B Transport The Tribunal orders: B Transport is to pay $843.09 to TQ and BC on or before 27 September 2023. Reasons 1. TQ and BC, in their EV vehicle, approached the [Carpark], operated by B Transport, on the evening of Friday 26 May 2023. There was a barrier at the top of...

6. DQ v Z Ltd [2021] NZDT 1634 (2 July 2021) [pdf, 228 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1634 APPLICANT DQ RESPONDENT Z Ltd The Tribunal orders: Z Ltd is to pay DQ the sum of $1200.00 on or before 23 July 2021. Reasons 1. On 8 December 2020 DQ purchased a ‘Victorian Humber’ toilet on Trade Me from a seller in [City] for $200.00, and on 12 December 2020 booked a Z Ltd (‘Z LTD’) courier vi...

7. BQ v XB & TB [2021] NZDT 1637 (7 October 2021) [pdf, 196 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1637 APPLICANT BQ RESPONDENTS XB and TB RESPONDENT INSURER WJ Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. This order replaces my order dated 4 October 2021. 2. TB is joined to the claim as a respondent. 3. 30 days after the date BQ provides XB and TB with a signed statement from all of the owners o...

8. AY Ltd v ZB Ltd [2014] NZDT 676 (26 September 2014) [pdf, 16 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 676 BETWEEN AY LIMITED APPLICANT AND ZB LIMITED RESPONDENT Date of Order: 26 September 2014 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] AY Limited contracted ZB Limited to provide a wooden building kitset with a 63mm profile for a construction project they were undertaking for a commercial client. The client’s p...

9. SG v QG [2023] NZDT 116 (15 March 2023).pdf [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...collected the boat from the [City 1] Port at around 10.30 a.m. on Thursday, 1 September 2022. 3. SG towed the boat down to [City 2] and delivered it to QG in [City 2] on 3 September 2023. 4. QG has refused to pay SG for the delivery because he claims that SG did not collect the boat on Wednesday, 31 August and as a result QG was charged $403.75 plus GST Demurrage. In addition, QG claimed the tyres on the boat trailer had been new but were badly worn on delivery, which QG claims is...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 88 Mega Wreckers Limited v Taafuli [pdf, 72 KB]

    MEGA WRECKERS LIMITED v KEITH TAAFULI NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2014] NZEmpC 88 [10 June 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2014] NZEmpC 88 WRC 6/14 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file a challenge out of time BETWEEN MEGA WRECKERS LIMITED Applicant AND KEITH TAAFULI Respondent Hearing: (on the papers by affidavit dated 14 February 2014 and submissions dated 17 March 2014) Representation: G Bennett, ad...