Search Results

1. NE & TE v SS [2024] NZDT 586 (6 September 2024) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...APPLICANT NE APPLICANT TE RESPONDENT SS APPLICANT'S INSURER W Ltd The Tribunal orders: SS is to pay W Ltd the total sum of $4,518.17 on or before Friday 27 September 2024. From this sum, W Ltd is to pay the Applicants the $500.00 insurance excess. Reasons: 1. NE who also represented his wife TE at the hearing, claims that on 14 November 2023, SS threw a bucket of yellow paint onto their property causing damage. NE and SE (the Applicants) an...

2. Alloa v Ullapool LCRO 159/09 (22 June 2010) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...LCRO 159/09 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Wellington Standards Committee 2 BETWEEN MR ALLOA of Wellington Applicant And MR ULLAPOOL of Auckland Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] Mr Alloa (the Applicant) is the sole director and shareholder of a...

3. BT Ltd v XN [2023] NZDT 549 (11 October 2023) [pdf, 101 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 549 APPLICANT BT Ltd RESPONDENT XN The Tribunal orders: XN is to pay $5701.05 to BT Ltd on or before 8 November 2023. Reasons 1. XN entered into a written storage agreement with BT Ltd (‘BT’) in June 2007 and had paid a monthly rental ever since to store belongings in a unit at their facility. 2. In around 2017 when t...

4. D Ltd v KC [2023] NZDT 782 (23 November 2023) [pdf, 96 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 782 APPLICANT D Ltd RESPONDENT KC The Tribunal orders: 1. KC is to pay D Ltd $14,045.22 on or before 20 December 2023. 2. The remainder of the claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. D Ltd sold and supplied various products to KC on a charge up basis. 2. D Ltd claim $14,703.04 for unpaid invoices and the interest on those invoic...

5. [2016] NZEmpC 27 Henderson v Nelson Marlborough DHB [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...2016) Counsel: A Sharma, counsel for the plaintiff P McBride, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 22 March 2016 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] This interlocutory judgment resolves costs applications which each party has brought against the other, with regard to an issue concerning service of the statement of claim in this proceeding. [2] The background is that the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) issued...

6. ZM & AX v S Ltd [2024] NZDT 812 (19 September 2024) [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 812 APPLICANT ZM APPLICANT AX RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by ZM and AX against S Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. ZM and AX (the applicants) engaged S Ltd (the respondents) to complete a professional ‘home inspection’ in order to ascertain whether or not the house that they intended purchasing had any defects which might influence their decision to purchase. The applica...

7. Te Manutukutuku Issue 1 [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...requirements of propriety. In formally launching this project we hope that it acts as a bridge across cultural gaps and helps to reduce anxiety in the community about the Treaty and about the work of the Waitangi Tribunal. Wira Gardiner Director ; THE CLAIMS PROCESS For most claimants, the decision to lodge an enquiry with the Waitangi Tribunal is the first step in bringing their claim to a formal hearing. Staff of the Waitangi Tribunal then check that the enquiry meets the pro...

8. [2024] NZIACDT 31 – HG v Liu (16 December 2024) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...WeChat text by ZA (the agent) who claimed to represent employers needing workers for recovery work following floods. Mr Liu replied quoting a fee of $800 for each application. [6] Mr Liu then provided the agent with a link to a questionnaire and requested that each applicant fill in their personal information. [7] RM, an associate of the agent, provided a file of supporting documents concerning the complainant to Mr Liu on 16 March 2023. This included a form required by Immigr...

9. [2018] NZEmpC 65 Wendco (NZ) Ltd v Unite Inc [pdf, 248 KB]

   WENDCO (NZ) LIMITED v UNITE INC NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 65 [8 June 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 65 EMPC 160/2018 IN THE MATTER OF of an application for an injunction and an interim injunction AND IN THE MATTER of an application for urgency BETWEEN WENDCO (NZ) LIMITED Plaintiff AND UNITE INC. Defendant Hearing: 8 June 2018 (heard at Auckland) Appearances: T Oldfield, counsel for...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 215 Edwards v Recreational Services Ltd [pdf, 144 KB]

    ...RECREATIONAL SERVICES LIMITED [2020] NZEmpC 215 [4 December 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 215 EMPC 384/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN THOMAS EDWARDS Applicant AND RECREATIONAL SERVICES LIMITED Respondent Hearing: On the p...