Search Results

1. AF v FG & TI [2024] NZDT 347 (24 April 2024) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...When the family member visited to collect [the dog] at the time AF had specified no one was home. 14. FG and TI then transferred the $3,384.00 back to AF. On 18 February 2024 FG and TI sent AF the following message: “…We are emailing to inform you that we have been speaking with a lawyer about the ownership of [the dog], and under the Dog Control Act 1996, section 2, a dog owner means a CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 6 person who has the dog in his or her possession, whe...

2. [2022] NZEmpC 171 Alkazaz v Deloitte (No. 3) Ltd [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...third parties. He says that in mid-2017 he received a call from Mr Speers asking about Mr AlKazaz’s duties while he was employed by DeloitteAsparona. The conversation was followed up with an email from Mr Speers to Mr Rosser reiterating the request for comment and attaching a series of CVs received by Enterprise IT from Mr AlKazaz leading up to his employment. Mr Rosser says he told Mr Speers that he did not think he could help him. He says that on both occasions he spoke to...

3. L and M v EQC [2019] CEIT-2019-0036 [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...determines whether the Applicant is entitled to recover the sum of $18,697.02 from the Respondent (EQC) said to be due to her for emergency repair works carried out to a number of properties owned by her or whether she fully and finally settled those claims with EQC and is, therefore, not entitled to recover that amount. [2] For the reasons that follow, I find that the Applicant is bound by the settlement agreement she entered into with EQC, the result of which is that the Applicant...

4. LCRO 099/2016 IJ v KL (28 July 2017) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...review are whether Mr KL settled the matter contrary to Mr IJ’s instructions and authority, whether he overcharged Mr IJ, and following settlement 2 whether he withheld from Mr IJ copies of correspondence and information on Mr KL’s fee as requested by Mr IJ. Complaint [5] Mr IJ lodged a complaint with the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service on 9 December 2014. The substance of his complaint was that Mr KL: (a) Did not keep him informed or act in his interests....

5. HI v D Ltd and FB [2024] NZDT 26 (20 February 2024) [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...September 2023 he was advised that a close family member was seriously ill. He was required to travel at short notice and booked flights to [City 1] and then attempted to book a rental car to drive to [City 2]. 2. He used the online booking platform, FS, which is operated by FB based in [overseas country]. His first booking was not able to be confirmed so he cancelled that booking and made another booking for a rental car with D Ltd. 3. A confirmation of his booking was received. H...

6. NH & UH v SD Ltd [2024] NZDT 666 (4 September 2024) [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...[Lodge] business, and the fact that there was another similar sign on another neighbour’s property, any reasonable person would consider that the Sign belonged to XS Limited. 9. However, having carefully considering the available evidence and information, and having heard from the parties, I find that NH and UH have proved on the balance of probabilities that the Sign belonged to them. I make this finding for the following reasons: (a) It is not disputed by XS Limited that it had i...

7. AODT Operational Policy - DELETE [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...depending on the numbers of appearances. A 'whole day' in AODT Court is calculated on attendance at the Court for at least 8 hours. If the Court day is actually shorter than 8 hours, that should be reflected in a lesser time recorded and claimed on the 'Record of attendance/ invoice' form. • attendance at any whānau hui, which are required on occasion at the direction of the presiding judge • other attendances or preparation if required between court sittings �...

8. Legal aid consultation on Criminal Procedure Act changes to criminal fixed fees [pdf, 637 KB]

   Criminal Procedure Act 2011 Consultation on proposed changes to the Criminal Fixed Fee Schedules Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity

9. Gray & Ors as Trustees of the John Gray Family Trust v Lay [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...where appropriate. 1.6 It has been necessary to hold three preliminary conferences and issue nineteen Procedural Orders prior to the conclusion of the hearings. These Orders were needed to set down timetables, and to rule on applications and requests made by the parties in the lead-up to the hearings. Although these Procedural Orders are not a part of this Determination, they are mentioned because some of the Claim 027 – Ponsonby Gardens – Unit 2 page 4 of 121...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 236 Maheta v Skybus New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 259 KB]

    ...time he had been away from that work.14 Skybus relied on the terms of the employment agreement to make this decision. [12] The Authority found that Mr Maheta refused to undertake retraining.15 Instead he wrote a lengthy letter to Skybus making requests for information about minutes of 8 At [27]. 9 At [26]. 10 At [28]. 11 At [30]. 12 At [31]. 13 At [44]. 14 At [44]–[45]. 15 At [46]. the meetings he had attende...