11439 items matching your search terms
Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 24d Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules D, E & F: Crown Prosecutions Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Provider number Firm number Court type District Court High Court Court location Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed...
...dismissed. 10. Based on the evidence I find NQ negligently damaged N Ltd’s car and is therefore liable for the losses suffered as ordered above. Referee: DTR Morgan Date: 20 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...
...Nonetheless, it is because of its fundamental investigative role that I think it is dangerous simply to interpret or gloss its explicit statutory processes by reference to Court procedure. [12] The Tribunal is empowered by s 73(1)(c) of the Act to request parties to provide copies of any documents that it reasonably requires. Section 73(2) requires parties to comply with any request or direction made under this section. [13] The Chair’s Directions and the standard direc...
...said, he did not seek any remedies. [4] The Authority had insufficient evidence, after its first investigation meeting, to determine the amount of commissions owed and directed both Mr Taylor and his company, WPL, to supply the Authority with information about gross sales figures within 14 days of its first determination that was issued on 9 July 2007. Mr von Tunzelman says the respondents in the Authority have failed to date to supply any information to the Authority going to tho...
...The earlier cases 3.2. Judge Acheson and the northern foreshore cases 3.3. In re Ninety-Mile Beach 4.0. The law of foreshore ownership: summary and analysis 5.0. Coastal planning: the current legal framwork 6.0. Conclusions and options for reform Bibliography of secondary sources Appendix: Selected Principal Documents 1. Kapanga Parumoana case (1872) 2 Coromandel MB 315-6, and extracts from Daily Southern Cross. 2. Crown Law opinion on foreshore area at Wenderholm. 3. Opi...
Criminal Procedure Act 2011 Consultation on proposed changes to the Criminal Fixed Fee Schedules Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity
...liability or in turn seek indemnity from others. PRELIMINARY ISSUES The Parties First and Tenth Respondents - Woodward Shelf Company No. 1 Limited and Mr Hayim Nachum [3] The first respondent, Woodward Shelf Company No 1 Limited, formerly Boulcott Investments Group Limited, previously known as Parklane Investments Limited (Parklane) was the previous owner and developer of the site on which the property is situated. Parklane took part in some of these proceedings,...
...the bottom of the candle shape and are not of the quality she requires or expected. 2. ND wishes to return the candles and claims compensation of $127.00. 3. KQ stands by the quality of the candles saying they are produced in beeswax and are formed within a mold. KQ says she has offered to exchange the candles, but this is not what ND wants. 4. The Issues to be resolved are: a. Were the candles of acceptable quality? b. If not, has KQ complied with her obligations under the...
...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 389 APPLICANT IH RESPONDENT QM The Tribunal orders: QM is to pay IH the sum of $11,948.00 on or before 26 June 2024. Reasons: 1. QM listed a [car] on [platform] for $1.00 reserve. 2. IH bid on the auction. Shortly before the auction ended the two highest bids were removed, leaving IH the winner of the auction. 3. IH was concerned about the late removal of the two highest bids and ask...
...money had been stolen. N Ltd advised TN and UX in a meeting on 7 November 2025 that their wedding would not be able to be hosted by it, unless they paid their deposit again. The applicants were accused of somehow having facilitated the burglary and informed by N Ltd that they would not get a refund of their deposit. The procedural background to this order 2. Today was the second hearing in this matter, scheduled by way of telephone conference. The first hearing, also a telephone co...