12541 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 294 APPLICANT ET APPLICANT MT RESPONDENT LS SECOND RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. LS exited her house and drove slowly down a long rural shared driveway. ET was also in the shared driveway with six dogs. He called them to come back to him. One of the dogs, a [breed] Stu
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2016] NZDT 976 BETWEEN EM LTD APPLICANT AND UN RESPONDENT Date of Order: 9 November 2016 Referee: Referee Blyth ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that UN is to pay EM Ltd the sum of $230.23 on or before 23 November 2016. Facts [1] On 12 July 2016 UN phoned EM Ltd to request a service person to come and service his Brivis gas appliance. EM Ltd booked the appointment for 27 July...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 195 APPLICANT And Respondent for Counterclaim MI RESPONDENT And Respondent for Counterclaim EG RESPONDENT INSURER Q Ltd The Tribunal directs: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. MI is to pay Q Ltd $6,444.92 on or before Monday 10 July 2023. Reasons: 1. At around 8am on 22 September 2022, MI was indic...
...power to award costs if it considers that a party has caused those costs to be incurred unnecessarily by bad faith or allegations that are without substantial merit. [23] The respondent submits that the claimants knew when they filed their application with the Tribunal that their claim had no merit as, by this time, they had obtained the ABS report. I have found that the ABS report is not as conclusive, with respect to the cause of water ingress, as the respondent claims. If...
Te Roopu Whakamana i te Tiriti 0 Waitangi Panui Tekau ma rima Mei 1992 Auckland Crown asset sales - Maori propose cooperative scheme The Crown sale of Sylvia Park, Auckland, land for which there is currently a Treaty of Waitangi claim, has prompted claimant tribes in the area to call on the Waitangi Tribunal to report to Government on the tribes' proposed method of assisting the Crown to dis pose of its Auckland assets that are under Treaty claim. The proposal is that iwi a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 102 APPLICANT SH RESPONDENT NS The Tribunal orders: 1. NS is to pay $4,000.00 to SH on or before 17 September 2022. Reasons: 2. SH won a [online auction website] auction for a van from NS and paid a $4,000.00 deposit the next day as per their verbal agreement. There were delays in SH organising flights to pick up the...
IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-00012/2019 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN N M and M M as trustees of the C M TRUST Applicants AND EARTHQUAKE COMMISSION First Respondent (Claim Withdrawn) AND TOWER INSURANCE LIMITED Second Respondent Date: 29 March 2021 Appearances: On the papers __________________________________________________________________...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 477 APPLICANT EI APPLICANT OI RESPONDENT TS RESPONDENT NS The Tribunal orders: 1. NS is added as a respondent to this claim. 2. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 3. The applicants, EI and OI, purchased a house at [Address] (“the house”) from the respondents, TS and NS on 11 January 2023. 4. With...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 588 APPLICANT IB RESPONDENT TT The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In March 2021, IB (the buyer) entered into a sale and purchase agreement to purchase a property at [address], in a private sale from TT (the seller) and his wife. The buyer got a building inspection done before purchase, though not a specialised...