Search Results

1. [2025] NZSSAA 22 (2 July 2025) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...to the BRC of 3 October 2023 and the BRC hearing on 9 April 2024, and that XXXX wished to appeal the BRC decision released to her on 3 October 2024. 6. The submission and documentation filed did not include the Authority’s notice of appeal form or some of the information requested in that form. A notice of appeal was subsequently filed by Mr Toilolo on 1 November 2024. 7. In response to the appeal the Ministry reviewed its decision. By the end of 2024 the Ministry indicated...

2. Hood v American Express International (NZ) Inc (Discovery) [2015] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 61 KB]

   ...balance. AMEX understands Mr Hood has since been informed that payment is not being pursued. [2.5] Mr Hood does not currently have a credit card with AMEX and has not since January 2008. [2.6] On 28 May 2009 Mr Hood sent an email to AMEX in which he requested correction of personal information held about him by AMEX and requested a copy of an email he believed AMEX had received from the ARMS Group on 27 February 2008. [2.7] On or about 4 August 2009 Mr Hood made a complaint to the P...

3. TD v SS & UU [2023) NZDT 318 (20 July 2023) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...enquiries about progress. He said that he was told by UU that plans would be completed and provided to the [council] before Christmas. This did not happen. In response to his further enquiries in January and February 2021, TD said that he had been informed that the [council] had requested more information, and that its progress was slow. TD then called the [council] himself, and learned that no plans had been submitted at that point. At a subsequent meeting, UU told TD that he, UU, had lear...

4. Waitangi Tribunal - The Whanganui district [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...District 13: The Northern South Island, Dr G A Phillipson FOREWORD The research report that follows is one of a series of historical surveys commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal as part of its Rangahaua Whanui programme. In its present form, it has the status of a working paper: first release. It is published now so that claimants and other interested parties can be aware of its contents and, should they so wish, comment on them and add further information and insights. The pub...

5. [2022] NZACC 84 – Olliver v ACC (10 May 2022) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 22 April 2022 Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau By AVL Appearances: B Hinchcliff for the appellant F Becroft for the respondent Judgment: 10 May 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for treatment injury - s 32, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 5 May 2021. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of: (a) the Corporation’s d...

6. NN v TD [2021] NZDT 1343 (11 March 2021) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...between the parties? b. If so, what were the terms? c. Did TD breach the contract? d. What sums, if any, are payable by TD to NN? Was there a binding contract between the parties? 3. The relevant law is the law of contract. A contract is formed when both parties decide to exchange something of value. A contract can also be conditional, in that until the conditions are fulfilled the contract cannot be concluded. 4. In this case I find that the parties had entered into a co...

7. JT v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 227 (24 February 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...$75.00. She emailed Q Ltd suspecting the letter was a scam and was informed of her breach with photographic evidence. 2. Q Ltd subsequently have continued to charge administration/ recovery fees of $75.00 every two weeks. At the time of filing the claim, JT had paid Q Ltd $95.00 and had requests for payment from Q Ltd for $325.00. JT seeks an order that she is not liable to Q Ltd for $325.00. 3. Q Ltd did not appear at the hearing, nor were there any submissions filed in response to the...

8. DL v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 388 (5 September 2023) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...problem with the hose reel is just as likely to have been caused by DL’s actions than by the product itself. 10. Therefore, the claim is dismissed. Referee: LK Whineray Date: 5 September 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

9. SH v I Ltd [2024] NZDT 463 (26 June 2024) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...there was limited access. The subfloor states that it was ‘only viewed from hole in cladding as limited access’. HL submitted that this was sufficient notice to a prospective CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 purchaser that if more information about these areas was required then a further investigation would be needed. 6. I accept that the Report does state the limitations of reporting on the areas that SH later found to be defective. 7. I have also considered w...

10. HB Ltd v NH & KX [2017] NZDT 1452 (11 April 2017) [pdf, 194 KB]

    ...account with BB because he knew KX had no money. NH, in giving an example, said he had noticed that when KX first started he had not had any lunch to eat, because he said he had no money. NH also said he had given KX an advance on his wages in the form of groceries in his first fortnight. f. Mr G of BB gave evidence that when he approached KX, after Mr G had discussed the invoices with NH, KX assured him that he accepted the invoices were his, and that he had paid NH in full. How...