Search Results

1. TD v SS & UU [2023) NZDT 318 (20 July 2023) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...enquiries about progress. He said that he was told by UU that plans would be completed and provided to the [council] before Christmas. This did not happen. In response to his further enquiries in January and February 2021, TD said that he had been informed that the [council] had requested more information, and that its progress was slow. TD then called the [council] himself, and learned that no plans had been submitted at that point. At a subsequent meeting, UU told TD that he, UU, had lear...

2. [2022] NZACC 84 – Olliver v ACC (10 May 2022) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 22 April 2022 Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau By AVL Appearances: B Hinchcliff for the appellant F Becroft for the respondent Judgment: 10 May 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for treatment injury - s 32, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 5 May 2021. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of: (a) the Corporation’s d...

3. HB Ltd v NH & KX [2017] NZDT 1452 (11 April 2017) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...account with BB because he knew KX had no money. NH, in giving an example, said he had noticed that when KX first started he had not had any lunch to eat, because he said he had no money. NH also said he had given KX an advance on his wages in the form of groceries in his first fortnight. f. Mr G of BB gave evidence that when he approached KX, after Mr G had discussed the invoices with NH, KX assured him that he accepted the invoices were his, and that he had paid NH in full. How...

4. Te Manutukutuku Issue 71 [pdf, 7.9 MB]

   ...some improvements but was inadequate to settle past griev­ ances and also failed to protect the Muaū poko owners’ rights and inter­ ests in the years that followed. By the 1980s, Muaūpoko had walked out of the domain board, but promised reforms were never made. Perhaps most seriously, the Tri­ bunal found that the Crown’s actions, including its funding decisions, were complicit in the serious pollution and degradation of the lake and the Hōkio Stream. By 2010, Lake Horowhenu...

5. NN v TD [2021] NZDT 1343 (11 March 2021) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...between the parties? b. If so, what were the terms? c. Did TD breach the contract? d. What sums, if any, are payable by TD to NN? Was there a binding contract between the parties? 3. The relevant law is the law of contract. A contract is formed when both parties decide to exchange something of value. A contract can also be conditional, in that until the conditions are fulfilled the contract cannot be concluded. 4. In this case I find that the parties had entered into a co...

6. JT v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 227 (24 February 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...$75.00. She emailed Q Ltd suspecting the letter was a scam and was informed of her breach with photographic evidence. 2. Q Ltd subsequently have continued to charge administration/ recovery fees of $75.00 every two weeks. At the time of filing the claim, JT had paid Q Ltd $95.00 and had requests for payment from Q Ltd for $325.00. JT seeks an order that she is not liable to Q Ltd for $325.00. 3. Q Ltd did not appear at the hearing, nor were there any submissions filed in response to the...

7. DL v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 388 (5 September 2023) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...problem with the hose reel is just as likely to have been caused by DL’s actions than by the product itself. 10. Therefore, the claim is dismissed. Referee: LK Whineray Date: 5 September 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

8. SH v I Ltd [2024] NZDT 463 (26 June 2024) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...there was limited access. The subfloor states that it was ‘only viewed from hole in cladding as limited access’. HL submitted that this was sufficient notice to a prospective CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 purchaser that if more information about these areas was required then a further investigation would be needed. 6. I accept that the Report does state the limitations of reporting on the areas that SH later found to be defective. 7. I have also considered w...

9. [2009] NZEmpC AC 2A/09 Lewis v Howick College Board of Trustees [pdf, 60 KB]

   ...system to deal with complaints against Members of the Employment Relations Authority. The Chief of the Authority has put in place an informal system that such complaints about other Authority Members are made to him. The Chief of the Authority requested my predecessor as Chief Judge to consider any complaints that may be made against the Chief of the Authority. My predecessor agreed, and I agreed, to continue this informal practice upon assuming office in 2005. As I have indicat...

10. Form 33 - Family legal aid - Tax invoice - Domestic violence [pdf, 540 KB]

    Templates V10 – July 2016 page 1 07/16 form 33 Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fee Domestic Violence (Applicant & Respondent) Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Provider number Name of law firm Firm number Details of claim Date latest activity completed Date of final disposition (if final invoi...