12541 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 572 APPLICANT IT Ltd RESPONDENT HI Ltd The Tribunal orders: HI Ltd is to pay the sum of $3,098.74 to IT Ltd on or before 12 December 2023. Reasons: 1. In March 2023, HI Ltd signed IT Ltd’s Terms of Business, and IT Ltd supplied a carpenter to help with a residential building project. The carpenter worked on the project f...
In the Employment Court No: / (Auckland, Wellington or Christchurch* Registry (the reference number allocated by *Corresponds to the ERA registry) the registry, i.e. EMPC/) Election to have matter heard in the Employment Court Between ………………………………………. [full name] of ……………………….. ………………………………………. [address] ……………………………. ………………………………………
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 128 APPLICANT SB RESPONDENT LQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 9 December 2023 SB purchased a [motor cross] motorbike after seeing it for sale on Facebook Marketplace. He took it for a test drive and negotiated with LQ, who is 16 years of age, to purchase it for the reduced price of $5,400. 2....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 572 APPLICANT KT RESPONDENT EG The Tribunal orders: EG is to pay KT the sum of 158.00 on or before 18 June 2024. Reasons: 1. EG, KT, and his partner were flatmates, they all moved into a property at the end of January 2024. EG was the head tenant and others entered into a flat sharing agreement with her. There was tension between EG a...
...722 APPLICANT NB APPLICANT QD RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. During the latter half of 2022, H Ltd were doing repair work on the property belonging to the Applicants. The Applicants were not living on the property. In late January 2023, the Applicants left some belongings in the empty property. Several days later the items were found to be missing, and there had been no sign of a break-in. Durin...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 50 APPLICANT BS APPLICANT NS RESPONDENT DL The Tribunal orders: 1. DL is to pay BS and NS $2,676.22 on or before 2 March 2023. 2. The claim for NS’ medical expenses is struck out. 3. The claim for the filing fee is dismissed. Reasons 1. At around 8.00am on Sunday 23 February 2022, NS was wal...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 212 APPLICANT QE RESPONDENT HN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] QE claims from HN the sum of $1,985.00 as a contribution to the cost of a fence that QE had built on the boundary between his and HN’s properties. HN denies any liability to pay. [2] QE said that the fence in question had been old and dilapid...
...MY is to pay the sum of $11,891.60 (including $700.00 insured loss) directly to J Limited on or before 19 June 2019. (I note that the contents of Mr Y’s counter-claim were heard at today’s hearing even though it does not appear to have been formally lodged – I am not requiring it to be formally lodged because of the liability finding made in this decision) Reasons 1. Ms B and Mr Y were the drivers involved in a collision on N Rd in May 2018. They had both been travelling nort...
LCRO 134/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 2 BETWEEN Mr AJ of Auckland Applicant AND Ms ZQ of Australia Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] At the beginning of July 2009, the Applicant was instructed by Mr VC to...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 332 APPLICANT TG APPLICANT TS RESPONDENT SECOND RESONDENT THIRD RESPONDENT NS NS Ltd BH APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) Applicant’s insurance company The Tribunal orders: 1. BH and NS Limited are both added as Respondents in the claim. 2. BH and NS Limited are jointly and severa...