Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12541 items matching your search terms

  1. Trustees of the Speirs Family Trust [pdf, 50 KB]

    ...the Weathertight Homes Tribunal, PA McConnell Date of Decision: 8 July 2009 Background The Speirs Family Trust filed applied for a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under s 49 of the Act for a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria. This review was based on the Chief Executive’s decision that the dwelling was not built within ten years immediately before the day on which the claim was brought – that ten year period...

  2. [2016] NZEmpC 145 S v I Ltd [pdf, 170 KB]

    ...AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 145 [4 November 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 145 EMPC 7/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for further and better disclosure of documents BETWEEN S Plaintiff AND I LIMITED Defendant Hearing: (on papers filed on 15, 22 and 23 March, 1, 15 and 29 July, 12 and 23 August, 1 and 8 September a...

  3. UH Ltd v BI [2023] NZDT 13 (12 April 2023) [pdf, 99 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 13 APPLICANT UH Ltd RESPONDENT BI The Tribunal orders: BI is to pay directly to UH Ltd the sum of $915.09 on or before Tuesday, 13 December 2023. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The parties agree the essential facts. The a...

  4. King & Bailey [2011] NZWHT Auckland 2 [pdf, 92 KB]

    ...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached information. The assessor’s report date...

  5. Pryazhnikov v New Zealand Police [2024] NZHRRT 49 [pdf, 471 KB]

    ...his right to live in Australia was linked to his employment. [2] On 25 June 2018, Mr Pryazhnikov was the subject of a family harm complaint made to the New Zealand Police (Police). On 9 July 2018, Mr Pryazhnikov made an information privacy request about that complaint. [3] On 30 July 2018, Police refused his request in its entirety. Mr Pryazhnikov claims that refusal, as well as other actions of Police, have interfered with his privacy. BACKGROUND [4] In mid-2018, Mr Pryazh...

  6. [2021] NZEnvC 199 Aokautere Land Holdings Limited v Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council [pdf, 214 KB]

    ...Environment Judge BP Dwyer sitting alone under s 309 of the Act Last case event: Legal argument heard at Palmerston North on 18 March 2021 Date of Decision: 22 December 2021 Date of Issue: 22 December 2021 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ON APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT A: Application declined B: Costs reserved REASONS Introduction [1] This decision is on an application by Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council (the Council) to strike out an appeal filed by Aokautere Land Holding...

  7. [2021] NZEmpC 152 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [pdf, 177 KB]

    ...Authority about him in its determination. 3 Employment Relations Act 2000, s 179(2). [7] He also wishes to have Mr Bryant removed as counsel for Enterprise IT, saying he has not been properly instructed by Enterprise IT, but that does not form part of his applications. [8] The reason Mr AlKazaz gives for wishing to strike out Enterprise IT is because he says that Enterprise IT has been placed in liquidation and that there is no agreement from the liquidator that proceed...

  8. KD & KX v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 533 (21 September 2023) [pdf, 184 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 533 APPLICANT KD APPLICANT KX RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: Introduction: 1. On the 21st of July 2022, KX and his sister KD were booked to fly from [City 1] to [City 2]. 2. KX and KD missed the flight and had to book a flight with [Airline] the following day. 3. Th...

  9. KT v EP [2024] NZDT 600 (30 August 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 600 APPLICANT KT RESPONDENT EP The Tribunal orders: EP is to pay $4,999.95 to KT on or before Monday 30 September 2024. Reasons: 1. KT and EP have friends in common. On 30 June 2022 they were at a mutual friend’s house watching a rugby game and were both drinking. KT decided to catch an Uber back to his home and so left the key of his [va...

  10. Raumati - Urenui Pā (2019) 394 Aotea MB 272 (394 AOT 272) [pdf, 293 KB]

    ...Whanganui) Appearances: Johnson Raumati and Jamie Tūta in person Judgment: 25 January 2019 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY Introduction [1] Johnson Raumati has sought an order to amend the gazette notice concerning Urenui Pā. When the application was first before the Native Land Court in 1932, one of the owners, Roimata Wi Tamihana, asked that the land be declared a reservation for the use and occupation of the Ngāti Mutunga tribe.1 Subsequently, when the gazette...