Search Results

1. NM v OB [2025] NZDT 56 (22 February 2025) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2025] NZDT 56 APPLICANT NM RESPONDENT OB The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NM purchased a [vehicle] from OB. The day after purchase NM was informed by others the [vehicle] was blowing blue smoke. NM later had a post purchase inspection of the [vehicle] and the inspection suggests a likely cause of the blue smoke is current or imminent engine failure and raised other issues. NM alleg...

2. ZP v EX [2024] NZDT 858 (10 December 2024) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...$18,000.00 being the purchase price of D, the veterinarian costs incurred and the half share to euthanise D. Accordingly, I order EX to pay ZP $19,701.77. Referee: Nigel Wolland Date: 10 December 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

3. Baker v Ngāti Tūwharetoa Hapū Forum - Te Matai No 1 and Te Matai No 2 [2015] Chief Judge's MB 900 (2015 CJ 900) [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...Tūtemohuta descent but, according to the applicants, the Te Matai owners’ claim is not representative of the Tūtemohuta hapū claim. [35] It was stated that the Trustees have started the formal process of withdrawing from the NTHF and have requested that NTHF does not proceed with Treaty negotiations on their behalf. It was submitted that there exist precedents where the Crown has allowed sub- tribes within Tūwharetoa to negotiate independent settlements, for example Ngāti...

4. H Ltd & K Ltd v I Ltd [2024] NZDT 184 (25 March 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...copiers for K Ltd, however, he was unable to substantiate that with an email to that effect. It is evident however, that it was K Ltd who cancelled the contract and wanted to be released from its obligations and that I Ltd wanted the contract to be performed. In an attempt to resolve this matter, I Ltd offered for K Ltd to lease only one of the copiers for a monthly rental of $212.75, however K Ltd did not accept that offer. What does K Ltd owe I Ltd on the cancelled lease agreement...

5. KC v BC Ltd [2023] NZDT 712 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...from the respondent’s written correspondence that the respondent gives a different meaning to new, as stated on its website: [brand] products are brand new, box damaged items. This means the product or packaging has been damaged in some way or form resulting in the product not making it to normal retail stores. They have never been owned by anyone prior. We buy all such [brand] products we can source, inspect, test and repair before making them available to you at the lowest prices...

6. AI v ZO LCRO 215 / 2011 (21 June 2013) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...on 30 September 2009. A further allegation made by Mr AI is that his signature on the appeal form is forged. He thinks or assumes this has been done by the Practitioner, or by someone else at the Practitioner’s direction. The Practitioner claims the signature had been done by Mr AI himself. [58] To add to the confusion, Mr AI claims to have personally signed an application form for the appeal in the Practitioner’s office well before the expiry of the appeal, and that the...

7. Directory of Official Information S-U [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings S-U About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz ma

8. Directory of Official Information S-U [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings S-U About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz ma

9. L and M v EQC [2019] CEIT-2019-0036 [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...determines whether the Applicant is entitled to recover the sum of $18,697.02 from the Respondent (EQC) said to be due to her for emergency repair works carried out to a number of properties owned by her or whether she fully and finally settled those claims with EQC and is, therefore, not entitled to recover that amount. [2] For the reasons that follow, I find that the Applicant is bound by the settlement agreement she entered into with EQC, the result of which is that the Applicant...

10. [2010] NZCA 56 CA14/2010 Petersons Global Sales Ltd v PB Engineering Ltd Ors [pdf, 33 KB]

    ...property which the Court held did not belong to them. Ground (1) misconstruction of the 2003 agreement [10] Having lost the initial rounds of the patent dispute PPSSL lacked the cash required to continue trading. So Mrs Browne’s company PGSL, formed in late 2002, entered the 2003 agreement with PPSSL to allow the business operated until then by PPSSL to continue. [11] Material provisions of the agreement are reproduced with emphasis added: [1] AGREEMENT SUMMARY The Manufact...