Search Results

1. Tautuku Block XIII Section 14 Trust v Cairns (2012) 16 Te Waipounamu MB 63 (16 TWP 63) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...Tautuku Survey District - Recovery of rental arrears, vacant possession and re- entry on Māori Freehold Land BETWEEN TAUTUKU BLOCK XIII SECTION 14 TRUST, TAUTUKU BLOCK XIII SECTION 15 TRUST AND TAUTUKU BLOCK XIV SECTION 2 TRUST Applicants AND ELIZABETH PATRINE CAIRNS AND RICHARD DAVIS CAIRNS Respondents Hearing: 9 March 2010, 2 Te Waipounamu MB 233 6 October 2010, 5 Te Waipounamu MB 49 3 November 2010, 5 Te Waipounamu MB 298 16 November 2012 28 Nov...

2. CB v UH Ltd [2022] NZDT 150 (26 August 2022) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...pay the sum of $16,129.45 to CB on or before 16 September 2022. Reasons: 1. The applicant CB is the owner of a property at [location redacted]. The neighbouring property at [location redacted] has some very tall trees near the boundary, and CB claims that the previous owner kept the trees trimmed when he raised the issue from time to time. In March 2018, the property was purchased by the respondent UH Ltd. CB claims that within a few months of purchase, the roof of his shed was damage...

3. Kingsnorth v Crawford – Motuaruhe 5D Block (2018) 185 Waiariki MB 106 (185 WAR 106) [pdf, 377 KB]

   ...THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20170006751 A20170006804 UNDER Sections 19 and 18(1)(a), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Motuaruhe 5D Block BETWEEN JOSEPH KINGSNORTH Applicant AND CAROLINE CRAWFORD First Respondent AND JENNIFER CRAWFORD, CAROLINE CRAWFORD AND COLLEEN HIGGINS AS TRUSTEES OF THE HARIATA KINGSNORTH WHĀNAU TRUST Second Respondent AND TE PORA BISHOP, LOUIS...

4. [2009] NZEmpC AC 29/09 Ogilvy NZ Ltd v Whitten [pdf, 26 KB]

   ...August 2009 JUDGMENT OF B S TRAVIS [1] The applicant, Ogilvy New Zealand (Ogilvy NZ) has applied for leave to challenge out of time a costs determination of the Employment Relations Authority issued on 31 March 2009. The statement of claim challenging the determination was two days late. The application for leave has been opposed by the respondent. [2] With the agreement of counsel, it was determined that, in order to avoid further costs, the matter should be determ...

5. HC v X Ltd [2023] NZDT 391 (13 September 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

   1 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 391 APPLICANT HC RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: X Ltd is to pay $7,889.57 to HC on or before Friday 13 October 2023. Reasons: 1. In December 2019 HC purchased a house owned by X Ltd by auction. Prior to the marketing of the property the vendor renovated an upstairs ensuite bathroom and a downstairs bathroom. Both bathrooms had identical...

6. [2022] NZIACDT 11 - BU v McCarthy (18 May 2022) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...daughter-in-law, MT, was in New Zealand unlawfully. Mr McCarthy was engaged to assist the complainant’s daughter-in-law and there was a discussion as to a s 61 request for her.1 Mr McCarthy took money from the complainant and represented that such an application had been made, but in fact he made no request. [2] A complaint was made to the Immigration Advisers Authority (the Authority). The Registrar of Immigration Advisers (the Registrar) has referred it to the Tribunal allegi...

7. Sax v Commissioner of Police (Strike-Out – Discrimination) [2022] NZHRRT 33 [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...that Ms Sax has failed to: [3.1] Prosecute her proceedings to trial and judgment; and [3.2] Explain, when required, the reasons for the prolonged non-compliance with timetable orders. [4] Regrettably there has been a delay in determining the application due to the backlog of work in the Tribunal, which has arisen for the reasons set out in Wall v Fairfax New Zealand Ltd (Delay) [2017] NZHRRT 8 at [2]. [5] On 6 July 2022, a Minute was issued which advised the parties the Tribunal was...

8. TX v SM [2021] NZDT 1574 (5 August 2021) [pdf, 167 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1574 APPLICANT TX RESPONDENT SM The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 8 December 2019 TX and her partner brought home their puppy, T, for whom they had paid a deposit to SM to purchase, some four weeks earlier. The total purchase price paid was $3000.00. 2. When T was about 6.5 months o...

9. MN v O Ltd [2024] NZDT 130 (15 April 2024) [pdf, 214 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 130 APPLICANT MN RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. O Ltd is to pay MN $849.00 on or before 10 May 2024. 2. The remainder of the claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. MN after watching a video for O Ltd Village, in which QX presented the village as a secure gated community, she purchased a unit and moved in. 2. MN says tha...

10. Katu v Peni - Tiroa E and Te Hape B (2015) 105 Waikato Maniapoto MB 157 (105 WMN 157) [pdf, 405 KB]

    ...then undertook a further review of the remuneration for the Executive Chairperson on 26 June 2014. [48] The trustees subsequently engaged Everest Group Human Resource Specialists (Everest Group HR) to review the position in terms of the back pay requested by Mr Peni. As a result of that review, the trustees made a full and final settlement for back pay to Mr Peni. That matter is currently in the process of being resolved and again will be discussed in more detail in relation to t...