Search Results

Search results for claim form.

11302 items matching your search terms

  1. Form 33 - Family legal aid - Tax invoice - Domestic violence [pdf, 540 KB]

    Templates V10 – July 2016 page 1 07/16 form 33 Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fee Domestic Violence (Applicant & Respondent) Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Provider number Name of law firm Firm number Details of claim Date latest activity completed Date of final disposition (if final invoi...

  2. Form 33 Family Legal Aid Fixed Fee: Domestic Violence [pdf, 541 KB]

    Templates V12 – August 2017 page 1 08/17 form 33 Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fee Domestic Violence (Applicant & Respondent) Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Provider number Name of law firm Firm number Details of claim Date latest activity completed Date of final disposition (if final inv...

  3. Form 24d Criminal Fixed D-F [pdf, 237 KB]

    Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 24d Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules D, E & F: Crown Prosecutions Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Provider number Firm number Court type District Court High Court Court location Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed...

  4. N Ltd v NQ [2024] NZDT 6 (20 February 2024) [pdf, 125 KB]

    ...dismissed. 10. Based on the evidence I find NQ negligently damaged N Ltd’s car and is therefore liable for the losses suffered as ordered above. Referee: DTR Morgan Date: 20 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

  5. AF v FG & TI [2024] NZDT 347 (24 April 2024) [pdf, 158 KB]

    ...When the family member visited to collect [the dog] at the time AF had specified no one was home. 14. FG and TI then transferred the $3,384.00 back to AF. On 18 February 2024 FG and TI sent AF the following message: “…We are emailing to inform you that we have been speaking with a lawyer about the ownership of [the dog], and under the Dog Control Act 1996, section 2, a dog owner means a CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 6 person who has the dog in his or her possession, whe...

  6. LCRO 161/2020 SE v GR (31 March 2021) [pdf, 305 KB]

    ...agreement for sale and purchase (the sale agreement) signed three months earlier on 3 March 2014 was subject to a finance condition being satisfied within “5 working days from the date of th[e] [sale] agreement”, and because the residential section formed part of land being subdivided, may also have been subject to a statutory condition.1 [4] At that time Ms SE was represented by another law firm, [Law Firm 2], who on 15 April 2014 forwarded a letter of engagement to Ms SE, and...

  7. Tank Trust v Auckland Council [2013] NZWHT Auckland 20 [pdf, 107 KB]

    ...Nonetheless, it is because of its fundamental investigative role that I think it is dangerous simply to interpret or gloss its explicit statutory processes by reference to Court procedure. [12] The Tribunal is empowered by s 73(1)(c) of the Act to request parties to provide copies of any documents that it reasonably requires. Section 73(2) requires parties to comply with any request or direction made under this section. [13] The Chair’s Directions and the standard direc...

  8. [2007] NZEmpC AC 62/07 Taylor & Anor v von Tunzelman [pdf, 31 KB]

    ...said, he did not seek any remedies. [4] The Authority had insufficient evidence, after its first investigation meeting, to determine the amount of commissions owed and directed both Mr Taylor and his company, WPL, to supply the Authority with information about gross sales figures within 14 days of its first determination that was issued on 9 July 2007. Mr von Tunzelman says the respondents in the Authority have failed to date to supply any information to the Authority going to tho...

  9. Smith v Waitakere City Council [pdf, 220 KB]

    CLAIM NO: 00277 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN SEAN SMITH Claimant AND WAITAKERE CITY COUNCIL First respondent (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 30 May & 1 June 2004 Appearances: Sean Smith in person as Claimant Susan Banbury & Georgina Grant for First Respondent Lawrence Ponniah for Second and Fourth Respondents Determination: 12 July 2004...

  10. AODT Operational Policy - DELETE [pdf, 271 KB]

    ...depending on the numbers of appearances. A 'whole day' in AODT Court is calculated on attendance at the Court for at least 8 hours. If the Court day is actually shorter than 8 hours, that should be reflected in a lesser time recorded and claimed on the 'Record of attendance/ invoice' form. • attendance at any whānau hui, which are required on occasion at the direction of the presiding judge • other attendances or preparation if required between court sittings ...