Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12922 items matching your search terms

  1. LCRO 126/2023 EG v HJ (28 November 2023) [pdf, 283 KB]

    ...[2023] NZLCRO 145 Ref: LCRO 126/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN EG Applicant AND HJ Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] The applicant has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Commit...

  2. CT & ID v S Ltd [2022] NZDT 7 (2 March 2022) [pdf, 153 KB]

    ...Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 7 APPLICANT CT APPLICANT ID RESPONDENT S Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 11 March 2021 CT and ID (the applicants) engaged S Limited (SL) to perform a pre- purchase inspection report on [address] (the property). 2. Some months after purchasing the property, the applicants became aware of issues with the windows and water ingress. 3. The ap...

  3. B Ltd v UE & SE [2023] NZDT 517 (2 October 2023) [pdf, 187 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 517 APPLICANT B Ltd RESPONDENT UE SECOND RESPONDENT SE The Tribunal orders: 1. B Ltd’s claim is dismissed. Reasons: 2. In August 2022 B Ltd (the applicant) entered into a contract with UE and SE (the respondents) for concept plans, developed design, detailed design and managing building consents for ext...

  4. DM v QB Ltd [2023] NZDT 124 (9 June 2023).pdf [pdf, 184 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 124 APPLICANT DM RESPONDENT QB Limited The Tribunal orders: QB Limited is to pay DM the total sum of $995.00 by Friday 30 June 2023. Reasons: 1. DM claims that on 13 April 2022 he purchased a [GPS wireless car play stereo unit] (the unit) for his [car] for $565.00 from QB Limited (the company), and also arranged for the company to...

  5. [2020] NZEmpC 187 Coetzee v Oamaru Meats Ltd [pdf, 165 KB]

    ...COETZEE v OAMARU MEATS LIMITED [2020] NZEmpC 187 [10 November 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 187 EMPC 326/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application to extend time to challenge a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN VERNON COETZEE Applicant AND OAMARU MEATS LIMITED Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances:...

  6. BD and CD v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 199 (13 April 2023) [pdf, 190 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 199 APPLICANT BD APPLICANT CD RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. CD is 13 years of age and was represented in the hearing by [redacted], BD. 2. CD became a member of U Ltd and in order to do so, provided an incorrect date of birth so that it appeared he met the U Ltd memb...

  7. [2016] EmpC 128 Vasona Networks Inc v Sunder [pdf, 83 KB]

    ...Networks Incorporated (Vasona) seeks leave to challenge a determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) out of time. 1 [2] The Authority’s determination was issued on 16 June 2016. In that proceeding Mr Rajeev Sunder claimed that he was unjustifiably dismissed by Vasona and he sought reinstatement to his position, or to a position no less advantageous to him as well as financial remedies. The issues identified by the Authority in its determination were:...

  8. X Ltd v L Ltd [2023] NZDT 104 (9 March 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 104 APPLICANT X Ltd RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. L Ltd is to pay X Ltd $1,380.00 on or before 30 March 2023. Reasons: 1. X Ltd purchased a second-hand tractor from L Ltd for $28,000.00. The tractor was advertised as having 1,216 engine hours. 2. When X Ltd received the tractor, it was disappointed wi...

  9. MS Ltd v CD [2023] NZDT 133 (11 May 2023) [pdf, 141 KB]

    ...Conclusion 15. As MS Ltd has proven it is entitled to be compensated for the total amount of $4,051.35 an order is made for that sum. Referee: K Cowie DTR Date: 11 May 2023 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

  10. AODT Court Operational Policy 2024 v3.02.pdf [pdf, 333 KB]

    ........................................................................................ 6 AODT defence lawyers ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Applications for a criminal legal aid grant ................................................................................................................... 8 Assignment of AODT legal aid grants ..............................................