Search Results

1. LX v O Ltd [2023] NZDT 619 (9 November 2023) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...do not need to consider the issue of remedy. 26. For these reasons, the claim by LX against O Ltd is dismissed. Referee: K Johnson CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Date: 09 November 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

2. DE v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 643 (6 November 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...tenable, and plausible. The applicant has had a reasonable opportunity to produce evidence of the vehicle’s servicing. He has not done so. Referee: G.P.Rossiter Date: 6 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

3. UC v Council [2023] NZDT 67 (27 March 2023) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...He said the Council monitors the growth of its build-outs and disagreed that this one was overgrown. In preparation for this hearing, he visited the site and took some photos which he provided, and considered there was no need for the Council to perform any remedial work to the vegetation. 5. NN agreed that there was some reduced visibility, but only for a small vehicle approaching that corner. The purpose of the build-out was to create some partial obstruction, and they were used all...

4. WT v DE Ltd [2024] NZDT 168 (8 April 2024) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...repair and alterations business from part of DE Ltd’s shop. WT also ran lessons at the shop. 4. In July 2020 WT drafted a basic written agreement detailing the arrangement. Both parties signed the agreement. 5. In November 2023, DE Ltd informed WT that the agreement was cancelled. 6. WT’s claim seeks compensation (loss of income and other costs/losses) on the grounds that the cancellation was unjustified and unlawful. 7. The hearing took place in [City] on 26 March 20...

5. A Ltd & CB v X Ltd [2023] NZDT 528 (16 October 2023) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...sufficient evidence to prove that the repairs the respondents undertook were the cause of the cooling system overheating. 15. I there find that the claim is dismissed. Referee: D Alofivae Date: 16/10/2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...

6. LW v XE [2023] NZDT 96 (10 March 2023) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...invoices which mention the additional faults. 10. Accordingly, the application is dismissed and there is no need for me to address the remaining issues. Referee: R Merrett Date: 10 March 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

7. LM v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 274 (10 August 2023) [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...LM receive the terms and conditions of hire? If so, is LM bound by those terms and conditions? 4. U Ltd have provided evidence the terms and conditions were made available to LM when the booking was initially made. LM stated there was too much information provided and as his English is limited, he did not read the terms and conditions. 5. The terms and conditions are contained in a six-page document. I accept it may have been difficult for LM to read the document with English bein...

8. BT v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 274 (30 June 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...purchased a [phone] online from T Ltd. He received the phone on 5 October 2022, and within a few days it was clear that the phone could not detect the pen or stylus as it was supposed to. BT took it to T Ltd’s kiosk at [mall] on 19 October 2023. BT was informed he was entitled to a replacement phone, because this was an out of box failure (referred to as an OBF). The [phone] was sent back to T Ltd, but it was repaired instead of replaced. When BT received the phone back, while at the [...

9. X Ltd v LG [2023] NZDT 358 (28 July 2023) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...except in certain limited circumstances (as set out in s 42). None of those circumstances apply in this instance. Therefore, this part of the claim must be dismissed. Referee: J Savage Date: 28 July 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

10. Deliu v New Zealand Law Society [2012] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 103 KB]

    ...The allegations made against Randerson J [10] In the separate “Bundle of Documents – Randerson J complaint by F Deliu” there is a letter dated 27 May 2010 from Mr Deliu to the Judicial Conduct Commissioner. It opens: I write to lodge a formal complaint against Justice Randerson. The essential grounds of my complaint are that his Honour has: 1. Defamed me to the President of the New Zealand Law Society; 2. Refused to apologize to a fellow court officer as a duty of respect wo...