Search Results

1. LCRO 35/2021 ZN v YM and XL (16 December 2021) [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...October 2020, Ms ZN provided legal services to an Incorporated Charitable Trust which traded under the name [WKJ] [(WK)]. 2 [5] In July 2020, Ms YM was invited to take up a position that had become vacant on the [WK] board. Her position was formalised on 2 September 2020. [6] At the time of Ms YM’s appointment, Ms ZN was engaged by [WK] in defending proceedings that had been brought by a former employee of [WK] in the Employment Relations Authority (ERA). [7] Request was ma...

2. N Ltd and others v HB YA [2023] NZDT 44 (13 February) 2023.pdf [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...vendors receive notice concerning a fencing dispute that they failed to bring to the purchaser’s attention? If so, what loss can SI prove he incurred as a result? 20. At a final pre-purchase inspection the day before settlement, SI said he was informed by a contractor working on the adjourning property that the fence was not in the correct position as it was encroaching into the neighbouring land by half a metre. 21. Clause 9.1 of the contract provides that “the vendor warrants...

3. Geary v Accident Compensation Corporation [2013] NZHRRT 34 [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...INTRODUCTION [1] This case is about two information privacy principles. First, the principle that where an agency holds personal information about an individual, that individual is entitled to have access to that information (Principle 6) and to request correction of the information. Second, the principle that an agency which holds personal information cannot disclose that information unless the agency believes, on reasonable grounds, that disclosure of the information is permitted by...

4. EG & EGE v UT & UTU [2016] NZDT 949 (21 April 2016) [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...is dismissed against both respondents. Facts [1] EG and EGE (the applicants) purchased a property from UT and UTU (the respondents) in late 2014 and moved into the property in January 2015. A short time later, the applicants’ neighbour informed them that a large amount of greywater was discharging onto his property. [2] The applicants called in drainage engineers and it was discovered after investigation that water discharging from a shower, basins, laundry tub and washing mac...

5. Form-24_Criminal-Fixed-D-F.pdf [pdf, 219 KB]

   Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 24 Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules D-F Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Provider number Firm number Court type District Court High Court Court location Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus:...

6. EK v 2E Ltd [2020] NZDT 1384 (2 December 2020) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...ingress protection (“IP”) had deteriorated because of age. He also states the phone had clearly suffered impact damage since purchase which would also have contributed to the IP wearing down. NN states the CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 information provided by 2E does not cover the matter of IP in secondhand (albeit refurbished) phones. He also states the warranty does not cover water damage. 7. Purchasers do not have any information available on the 2E website, or provided...

7. NC & CC v FU Ltd [2020] NZDT 1389 (28 October 2020) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...provided evidence of those costs and the full amount claimed, apart from the Tribunal filing fee, which cannot be awarded, is to be paid by CD, being $1694.00. Referee: Date: 28 October 2020 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

8. LF Ltd v DQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 186 (8 November 2022) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...respondent should bear 60% of the damage, leaving the applicant responsible for the other 40%. The sum payable by the applicant is therefore $999.77. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 8 November 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

9. N Ltd v NU [2022] NZDT 95 (10 August 2022) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...caused by a failure to drive with reasonable care and skill. That failure was KL’s and hers alone. 10. Consequently, I have dismissed the claim against NU. Referee: G R Meyer Date: 10th August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

10. HC v T Ltd [2022] NZDT 214 (14 November 2022) [pdf, 106 KB]

    ...find that for the price paid, and regular and type of use expected, that a reasonable consumer would not expect such a watch to retain all its characteristics and functionality over a 3 year mark. In saying this I had some regard to its continued performance for over a year past the manufacturer’s 2 year warranty (acknowledging this is not the limit under the CGA) and that at least some deterioration could reasonably be expected over this period of time, not limited to wear and tear, e...