Search Results

1. [2020] NZEmpC 137 Sinton v Coatesville Motors 2013 Ltd [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...On the papers Appearances: P Mathews, advocate for plaintiff P McBride, counsel for defendant Judgment: 2 September 2020 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE KATHRYN BECK (Objection to jurisdiction) [1] This is an application to determine the scope of the challenge that is before the Court. [2] The plaintiff has filed a statement of claim challenging the whole of the determination of the Employment Relations Authority.1 [3] In his statement of claim...

2. Head Heights Ltd [2011] NZWHT Auckland 6 [pdf, 87 KB]

   ...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached information filed on 21 December 2010....

3. VJ & VL v AE LCRO 88 / 2012 (14 May 2013) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...that amount. [7] The narration of her invoice is as follows: My fee for professional attendances in respect of receiving charges, including attendances on yourselves and Police, attending to execution of Official Information & Privacy Act forms for request of disclosure of Police file, serving same on Police, all attendances at Auckland District Court for bail and resolution of charges, reporting to you and to all incidental matters thereto. [8] The timesheet provided by the...

4. Apply for a review

   ...you will be notified when you get to the point where you can file a challenge with the Authority. If you want the Authority to review this decision, you must apply within two months from the date you are advised of Inland Revenue's decision. Use this form to apply: Notice of claim How much does it cost? It costs $533 (including GST) to apply for a review. This fee can be paid online using File and Pay What you need to send us You need to send us 3 copies of this form, Inland Revenue’s decisio...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Taxation and Charities Review Authority >
   3. Tax Disputes

5. [2008] NZEmpC AC 5/08 Skinner & Anor v Stayinfront Inc & Ors [pdf, 33 KB]

   ...Plaintiffs Rob Towner, Counsel for the defendant Judgment: 19 March 2008 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C M SHAW [1] This judgment concerns strike out applications made by the defendant. Background [2] When the plaintiffs filed personal grievance claims in the Employment Relations Authority, the defendant raised the preliminary question of whether final and binding settlements they had entered into at the end of their employment in 2002 amounted to accord and satisfactio...

6. GL Ltd v MD [2020] NZDT 1369 (14 October 2020) [pdf, 208 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1369 APPLICANT GL Ltd RESPONDENT MD The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed Reasons 1. MD entered into a contract with GL Ltd for employment advocacy services after she was made redundant from her part-time job. 2. The contract was on a contingency basis and the terms of engagement provided that, unless th...

7. Lee & Anor [2011] NZWHT Auckland 9 [pdf, 81 KB]

   1 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 9 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6422: DENNIS LEE AND SANDRA HOCKINGS-LEE – 15A SYLVANIA CRESCENT, LYNFIELD ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Dennis Lee and Sandra Hockings-Lee are the owners of a leaky home. They filed a claim under sect...

8. HE v QZ [2023] NZDT 372 (18 January 2023) [pdf, 211 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 372 APPLICANT HE RESPONDENT QZ The Tribunal orders: The hearing is adjourned. The parties will be notified of the date and time of the next hearing. Reasons 1. The second hearing took place on 23 December 2022 at the [Town] Court. HE and QZ attended the hearing. 2. The claim and counter-claim relate to buildi...

9. QU v LG [2023] NZDT 775 (18 December 2023) [pdf, 194 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 775 APPLICANT QU RESPONDENT LG The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. QU purchased a horse, [The horse], from LG in December 2021. The parties agree that LG represented that [The horse] was suitable for show jumping. QU believes that this was a misrepresentation and claims: a. A refund of the $12,000.00...

10. MVDT Annual Report 2019-2020 [pdf, 381 KB]

    ...TRIBUNAL 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020 Dear Minister Pursuant to section 87 of the Motor Vehicle Sales Act 2003 (the Act) we are pleased to submit the following Annual Report. In this Annual Report we: 1. Summarise the applications the Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal has dealt with during the year. 2. Explain how those applications were resolved. 3. Detail cases which, in our opinion, require special mention. 4. Highlight the Tribunal’s incre...