Search Results

1. [2015] NZEmpC 21 Haldemann LLC v Nelson [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...she applied for work with the ICC he had only recently dismissed her for not having invited him to a social event, for being a Nazi sympathiser, and for falsifying her resumé. She had already raised her personal grievance and had lodged her claim with the Authority. It was submitted it would be absurd to suggest that she would have invited subsequent employers to speak to Mr Katavich in those circumstances. (d) Further, there had been evidence before the Authority in th...

2. B Ltd v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 482 (17 May 2024) [pdf, 176 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 482 APPLICANT B Ltd RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: M Ltd is to pay the sum of $10,863.00 to B Ltd on or before 31 May 2024. Reasons: 1. This dispute arises apparently as a result of email hacking, more formally known as business email compromise (BEC) fraud. On 14 August 2023, B Ltd issued an invoice to M Ltd for $24,725.00 for...

3. Savage v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 53 [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...now revoking, deeming Mr Savage’s application for review “unacceptable” now that the relevant decision had been revoked. There is no record of Mr Savage applying to review the 14 November 1998 decision. [8] On 3 February 2014, Mr Savage requested further lump sum compensation on the basis that he had received new medical evidence that the 1988 lump sum payment was inadequate. The new medical evidence referred to arose in the context of a District Court judgment on his enti...

4. GI v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 452 (27 June 2024) [pdf, 197 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 452 APPLICANT GI RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. D Ltd is to pay GI $95.00 on or before 18 July 2024. This is calculated as follows: Refund of deposit to GI $300.00 Refund of overpaid rent to GI $ 95.00 Less compensation for cleaning and carpet replacement $300.00 Balance owed to GI $ 95.00 2. The claim by...

5. SD v O [2023] NZDT 237 (18 August 2023) [pdf, 197 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 237 APPLICANT L APPLICANT SD RESPONDENT O The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 2. Sometime in August or September 2022 SD said he was towing a tandem trailer behind his small truck, driving between [Town 1] and [Town 2] when he claims a tyre on his trailer was damaged as a result of...

6. IB v IY [2016] NZDT 1407 (25 Feburary 2016) [pdf, 96 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2016] NZDT 1407 APPLICANT IB RESPONDENT IY RESPONDENT'S INSURER JB Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: IY is to pay the sum of $1,846.44 to IB on or before 10 March 2016. Reasons: 1. On 14 September 2015, there was a collision between IB’s car and IY’s car on C Place, [Suburb]. At the time of the impact, both...

7. LX v O Ltd [2023] NZDT 619 (9 November 2023) [pdf, 112 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 619 APPLICANT LX RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by LX against O Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. LX owns land on which high voltage power lines run across part of it. LX now brings a claim against O Ltd for $30,000.00. 2. The issues to be resolved are: (a) Did O Ltd breach the agreement? (b) If not, was O Ltd n...

8. ED & KD v NQ [2023] NZDT 701 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 228 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 701 APPLICANT ED APPLICANT KD RESPONDENT NQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. ED and KD and NQ own adjoining properties at [Town]. Currently there is an area of approximately 25 metres on the boundary that is unfenced. ED and KD approached NQ with fencing proposals. As they did not get a definitive respon...

9. HC v T Ltd [2022] NZDT 214 (14 November 2022) [pdf, 106 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 214 APPLICANT HC RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. Just over 3 years ago, HC says he purchased a T Ltd Smartwatch as part of a mobile phone bundle from a supplier. He could not recall the price of the bundle, but thought the watch at the time was valued at about $300.00. HC sa...

10. FS v Q Ltd [2022] NZDT 267 (19 December 2022).pdf [pdf, 202 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 267 APPLICANT FS RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 30 July 2022, while driving from [City 1] to [City 2], FS’ [car] went into limp mode. The vehicle was towed to Q Ltd in [City 3] where a fault was diagnosed and repaired at a cost of $3745.50. When tested, the vehicle went...