Search Results

1. Memorandum of Counsel for Guardians of the Bays Incorporated (dated 16 March 2018) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...section 274 parties, in their own right. This memorandum follows Wellington International Airport Limited’s (WIAL) request for an adjournment of its proceedings to a reporting date of 28 September 2018 (to allow WIAL to make progress with its application to the Director General of Civil Aviation (Director) for approval of its proposed Runway Safety Area Extension (RESA)), and the Court’s direction of 1 March that: Any party wishing to comment on the requested adjournment and/o...

2. AI v Secretary for Justice 10 August 2012 NZRA 000012 [pdf, 83 KB]

   REVIEW AUTHORITY NEW ZEALAND 2012 NZRA 000012 Applicant AI Respondent Secretary for Justice Date of Decision: 10 August 2012 ________________________________________________________________ DECISION ________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION 1. On the 17th 2. The Secretary communicated advice of that decision to the applicant by letter dated 25 May 2012. May 2012 The Secretary for Justice (‘the Secretary�...

3. Gilford v Accident Compensation Corporation [2016] NZACA 03 [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...expressly say so, its effect was restricted to declining cover for the mental consequences of the 1985 injury. Mr Guilford continued to obtain coverage for the physical consequences of that accident. The Corporation had in fact treated Dr Eyers’ request as a new claim, so the original coverage of the accident was unaffected. [7] Mr Guilford filed an application for review of the 22 August 1997 decision many years later, on 12 October 2015. The Corporation accepts he had not bee...

4. [2012] NZEmpC 4 Haig v Edgewater Developers Ltd and Others [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 4 [20 January 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 4 ARC 30/10 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF interlocutory applications BETWEEN ROBERT HAIG Plaintiff AND EDGEWATER DEVELOPERS LIMITED First Defendant AND CARRINGTON FARMS LIMITED Second Defendant AND PH II INCORPORATED Third Defendant Hearing: 10 September 2010 (i...

5. DF v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 177 (19 April 2023) [pdf, 143 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 177 APPLICANT DF RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: Q Ltd is to pay $475.59 to DF on or before 5 May 2023 REASONS Brief Details of Claims 1. On 14 January 2021, DF engaged Q Ltd to manage the rental of her home at [Address] while she was away working in [Country]. A Portfolio Management Agreement was signed by both pa...

6. KO v TC [2023] NZDT 713 (17 December 2023) [pdf, 175 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 713 APPLICANT KO RESPONDENT TC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. KO purchased goods through [online] marketplace from TC. KO arranged a courier pick-up of the goods but says only some of the purchased goods were in the package TC provided to the courier. 2. KO says he is entitled to a refund of $160....

7. [2022] NZEmpC 3 Tupe v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa O Tuhoe Trust [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...(the Act). This amount was reduced by a further 30 per cent under s 124. 1 Tupe v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa o Tuhoe Trust [2021] NZERA 411 (Member Eleanor Robinson). 2 Although that success was on a more limited basis than he had claimed. [2] Mr Tupe now wishes to challenge that determination on a de novo basis, but he requires a grant of leave from the Court as the challenge was not filed within the statutory timeframe. The application is opposed by the Trus...

8. KW v WB LCRO 118 / 2010 (20 April 2012) [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...statement “was incorrect as distributions of funds agreed to by the parties was the responsibility of [the Practitioner’s firm]”. He continued that the Practitioner did not know that he had engaged the other lawyer prior to when that lawyer requested the transfer of the funds. [13] The Applicant was unable to comment on Rule 10.2 but thought it should be changed if it meant that lawyers could transfer money from one firm to another for a client without reference to the clie...

9. Dennett v Te Tumu Paeroa - Rotohokahoka D North 2A (2017) 178 Waiariki MB 24 (178 WAR 24) [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...5038, Wellington 6140, greg.shaw@tetumupaeroa.co.nz christine.reuhman@tetumupaeroa.co.nz mailto:graeme27@xtra.co.nz mailto:greg.shaw@tetumupaeroa.co.nz mailto:christine.reuhman@tetumupaeroa.co.nz 178 Waiariki MB 25 Introduction [1] The applicants seek an award for the costs incurred in pursuing these proceedings against Te Tumu Paeroa. Although an agreement was reached prior to the Court hearing, the applicants claim that the costs they incurred should be met by the Māori...

10. Holmes v Housing New Zealand Corporation [2015] NZHRRT 36 [pdf, 185 KB]

    ...(DCC Noise Control) regarding the behaviour of another tenant of HNZ who lived in the same block of housing units. Believing his concerns had not been adequately addressed he wrote to the HNZ Regional Manager by letter dated 27 March 2012 making a request under the Privacy Act 1993 for recordings of his calls to the HNZ 0800 number in the period 15 April 2011 to 27 March 2012 together with all records regarding the 0800 calls and the action taken by HNZ regarding those calls. 2 [...