Search Results

1. NC v X Ltd [2024] NZDT 274 (10 May 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...conducts audits and has processes in place to ensure this does not happen, however with any manual system, it is possible mistakes are made. KB considers it unlikely all previous orders of this product were expired. NC had asked for batch number information however KB states that although their distribution warehouse may have records of batches received, there is no system to identify what batch was sold to a particular customer. KB stated this is the same for all retailers. I accept t...

2. CU & LU v QD Ltd [2024] NZDT 660 (21 August 2024) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...functional driveway. For this reason, I find the amount that is reasonable is $13,725.25. Referee: C Murphy Date: 21 August 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...

3. YT v CU Ltd [2024] NZDT 669 (23 July 2024) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...alerted her to the problem or dealt with it earlier. No breach of contract has been proved, so the landlord’s claim against the manager must be dismissed. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 23 July 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

4. ET v QC [2024] NZDT 813 (20 November 2024) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...Respondent’s car was behind the give way line on [Road 2] at the intersection at the time of the collision. Accordingly, I am unable to find in favour of the Applicant. Referee: CD Bennett Date: 20 November 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...

5. Waitangi Tribunal Te Aroha Maunga Settlement process report [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   ...Tribunal determined that groups in the Hauraki district have well-founded claims concerning past Crown actions, which had breached the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, and caused them harm, or prejudice . The 12 iwi in the Hauraki district have formed the Hauraki Collective (the Collective), to ne- gotiate settlement of their claims with the Crown . However, one of those iwi, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, has raised serious concerns about Crown actions in the settlement negotiations . Ngā...

6. [2020] NZIACDT 17 - XA v Hill (10 March 2020) [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...PRELIMINARY [1] It is alleged that Ms Hill, the adviser, used an unlicensed employee within her office, her life partner, to engage with her client, the complainant, and also to do immigration work that only a licensed adviser is allowed to perform. Furthermore, that she was negligent in permitting incorrect information regarding the complainant’s work experience to be provided to Immigration New Zealand. [2] The essential issue to consider is one of credibility, being whether Ms...

7. Tautuku Block XIII Section 14 Trust v Cairns (2012) 16 Te Waipounamu MB 63 (16 TWP 63) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...current trustees are Geroge Tikao, Graham Gremell, Natalie Hoani, Peter Roben and Richard Manning. 1 CFR OT 168/252; CFR OT168/251; and CFR OT168/249. 16 Te Waipounamu MB 65 [8] The blocks were formerly administered collectively by the Tautuku Waikawa Lands Trust. Applicants’ submissions [9] An application was lodged by the three Tautuku block ahu whenua trusts seeking orders for rental arrears, re-entry to and vacant po...

8. Nelson Standards Committee v Ord [2025] NZLCDT 4 (17 January 2025) [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (NZBORA). 8. Dr Ord advised [Ms X] to include an action for defamation because it “was the only way [she] could recoup anywhere near the amounts [she] want[ed]”. 9. On 22 March 2021, Legal Aid wrote to Dr Ord requesting further information, including an explanation of: a. the damages sought; b. the intended defendants; 13 c. why the settlement offer had not been accepted; and d. whether Dr Ord considered the legal criteria for a...

9. Geary v Accident Compensation Corporation [2013] NZHRRT 34 [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...INTRODUCTION [1] This case is about two information privacy principles. First, the principle that where an agency holds personal information about an individual, that individual is entitled to have access to that information (Principle 6) and to request correction of the information. Second, the principle that an agency which holds personal information cannot disclose that information unless the agency believes, on reasonable grounds, that disclosure of the information is permitted by...

10. N Ltd and others v HB YA [2023] NZDT 44 (13 February) 2023.pdf [pdf, 221 KB]

    ...vendors receive notice concerning a fencing dispute that they failed to bring to the purchaser’s attention? If so, what loss can SI prove he incurred as a result? 20. At a final pre-purchase inspection the day before settlement, SI said he was informed by a contractor working on the adjourning property that the fence was not in the correct position as it was encroaching into the neighbouring land by half a metre. 21. Clause 9.1 of the contract provides that “the vendor warrants...