Search Results

1. KW v WB LCRO 118 / 2010 (20 April 2012) [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...statement “was incorrect as distributions of funds agreed to by the parties was the responsibility of [the Practitioner’s firm]”. He continued that the Practitioner did not know that he had engaged the other lawyer prior to when that lawyer requested the transfer of the funds. [13] The Applicant was unable to comment on Rule 10.2 but thought it should be changed if it meant that lawyers could transfer money from one firm to another for a client without reference to the clie...

2. EI & RA v IL [2023] NZDT 114 (2 March 2023) [pdf, 209 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 114 APPLICANT EI APPLICANT RA RESPONDENT IL RESPONDENT INSURER (if applicable) U Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The Applicants’ claim is dismissed. The Respondent’s counterclaim is upheld and the Applicants are to pay the Respondent’s Insurer U Ltd $4,606.44 within 30 days of the date of this order....

3. ED v UQ [2023] NZDT 305 (19 June 2023) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

4. HD v FT [2017] NZDT 1396 (20 March 2017) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...DK was driving the car as part of her driving lesson at the time. The impact occurred as the Mitsubishi entered the roundabout and was struck on the rear right-hand side by the Toyota Corolla coming from its right. 2. HD and his insurer J Ltd now claim the cost of repairs to the Toyota of $3,883.78. There were no uninsured losses. FT counterclaims the cost of repairs to the Mitsubishi of $1,166.10, all of which was uninsured. 3. The issues to be determined are: a) Did the parties rea...

5. DX v STX & SCX [2023] NZDT 493 (2 October 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

6. Enforcement of Access Direction (s104) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...agency has not complied with the access direction or has not complied in full. The agency has not lodged an appeal within 20 working days from the date of the notice given to the parties under section 91(7) of the Privacy Act 2020. When to use this form Use this form when applying for an order requiring the agency to comply with the access direction under section 104 of the Privacy Act 2020. Completing this form • Print clearly in CAPITALS. Use a black pen or blue pen when completi...

7. Holmes v Housing New Zealand Corporation [2015] NZHRRT 36 [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...(DCC Noise Control) regarding the behaviour of another tenant of HNZ who lived in the same block of housing units. Believing his concerns had not been adequately addressed he wrote to the HNZ Regional Manager by letter dated 27 March 2012 making a request under the Privacy Act 1993 for recordings of his calls to the HNZ 0800 number in the period 15 April 2011 to 27 March 2012 together with all records regarding the 0800 calls and the action taken by HNZ regarding those calls. 2 [...

8. ND v KQ [2024] NZDT 631 (24 September 2024) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...the bottom of the candle shape and are not of the quality she requires or expected. 2. ND wishes to return the candles and claims compensation of $127.00. 3. KQ stands by the quality of the candles saying they are produced in beeswax and are formed within a mold. KQ says she has offered to exchange the candles, but this is not what ND wants. 4. The Issues to be resolved are: a. Were the candles of acceptable quality? b. If not, has KQ complied with her obligations under the...

9. Dealing with someone else's fines

   ...it to us. Application for cancellation of warning by vehicle owner Back to top If the court seized your vehicle or other property to pay someone else’s fines If your property has been seized by the court to pay someone else’s fine, you can make a claim to it. Fill out the Claim to Seized Property form and post it to us. Claim to seized property If your vehicle has been seized after you were sent a warning letter, and you feel that there are reasons you should get it back, you can apply to c...

   Located in:

   1. Fines & payments >
   2. About fines

10. Gilvray v Rungarunga - Succession to Tamati Rungarunga [2023] Chief Judge's MB 551 (2023 CJ 551) [pdf, 319 KB]

    ...WĀHANGA Under Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Succession to Tamati Rungarunga I WAENGA I A Between FRIGATE LANI GILVRAY (deceased) and LILLAN PUHI TAI CALLAGHAN Ngā kaitono Applicants ME And TAMATI DAVID PEKA RUNGARUNGA Ngā kaiurupare Respondents Nohoanga: Hearing 26 October 2022, 2022 Chief Judge’s MB 842-845 29 March 2022, 2022 Chief Judge’s MB 129-136 (Heard via Zoom) K...