Search Results

1. LM v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 274 (10 August 2023) [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

2. N Ltd v NU [2022] NZDT 95 (10 August 2022) [pdf, 106 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 95 APPLICANT N Limited RESPONDENT NU SECOND RESPONDENT KL THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT B Limited APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Limited The Tribunal orders: KL is to pay $17,285.20 to J Limited by the 10th September 2022. Reasons 1. In the absence of KL, who has...

3. BC v TG [2021] NZDT 1636 (13 October 2021) [pdf, 105 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1636 APPLICANT BC RESPONDENT TG The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 8 December 2020 TG was driving a tractor belonging to ST on [Road A]. BC was driving his car on [Road A], behind the tractor. TG intended to turn into a driveway so slowed and began to turn right. As he did so, BC began to o...

4. TT v ST [2023] NZDT 31 (20 March 2023) [pdf, 166 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 31 APPLICANT TT RESPONDENT ST APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reason 1. The claim is about damage to TT’s car caused by bollards belonging to ST. TT and J Ltd are claiming $10,858.44 to repair the damage. 2. On or about 23 March 2021 TT drove t...

5. MB v TX & EX [2023] NZDT 386 (16 August 2023) [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...TX SECOND RESPONDENT EX APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) K Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. EX is to pay the sum of $6850.22 to K Ltd, as insurers for MB, by no later than 8 September 2023. 2. The claim against TX is dismissed. Reasons: 3. MB was driving his car along [Street] on 22 January 2022. As MB passed a taxi stopped on the side of the road, the passenger in the rear of the taxi opened the right rear door. The door hit the...

6. DF v H Ltd [2023] NZDT 399 (7 September 2023) [pdf, 200 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 399 APPLICANT DF RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by DF is dismissed. 2. LH is removed as the respondent party and H Ltd is added as the respondent party. Reasons 1. In June 2023, DF’s family stayed for one night at the [accommodation provider] operated by H Ltd. A charge of $179 for the...

7. FA v HR and others [2024] NZDT 670 (20 August 2024) [pdf, 107 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 670 APPLICANT FA RESPONDENT HR & KX SECOND RESPONDENT WD Trust THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT QS Limited The Tribunal orders: HR, KX, and WD Trust, jointly and severally, are to pay the sum of $1,415.74 to FA on or before Monday 9 September 2024. Reasons: 1. FA owns a cross-leased property at [Address 1]....

8. Dennett v Te Tumu Paeroa - Rotohokahoka D North 2A (2017) 178 Waiariki MB 24 (178 WAR 24) [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...5038, Wellington 6140, greg.shaw@tetumupaeroa.co.nz christine.reuhman@tetumupaeroa.co.nz mailto:graeme27@xtra.co.nz mailto:greg.shaw@tetumupaeroa.co.nz mailto:christine.reuhman@tetumupaeroa.co.nz 178 Waiariki MB 25 Introduction [1] The applicants seek an award for the costs incurred in pursuing these proceedings against Te Tumu Paeroa. Although an agreement was reached prior to the Court hearing, the applicants claim that the costs they incurred should be met by the Māori...

9. Refugee practice standards [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...respond to such vulnerabilities, both in terms of client management and the relevance of such issues to the legal case, and should be aware of and apply relevant guidance (including, for example, the UNHCR Guidance Note on the Psychologically Vulnerable Applicant in the Protection Visa Assessment Process). 1.3 Capable of working competently with interpreters and translators, including having an effective understanding of their role as independent professionals. 1.4 Able to interact wit...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 8 Nelson v Katavich [pdf, 49 KB]

    ...describing 52 documents disclosed by the plaintiff in response to the defendants’ request. In an accompanying email, he said that these were “all the documents held by Ms Nelson” and invited inspection. Ms Elliott did not respond. filed an application for an order for disclosure of the documents sought. [12] On 5 August 2013, the defendants disclosed 67 documents by description in a list and by sending copies of them to Mr Acland. [13] In support of the plaintiff’s ap...