Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12541 items matching your search terms

  1. H Trustees Ltd v PT [2024] NZDT 512 (12 June 2024) [pdf, 249 KB]

    Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 512 APPLICANT person or organisation making the original claim H Trustees Ltd RESPONDENT person or organisation originally claimed against PT Result of application for rehearing: Rehearing Refused The Order of 13 January 2021 stands. Reasons for decision: 1. I set out the procedural background of this matter, as it is relevant to my decision...

  2. MD Ltd v UB [2017] NZDT 1483 (12 February 2018) [pdf, 96 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2018] NZDT 1483 APPLICANT MD Limited RESPONDENT UB The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. UB had been a customer of MD Limited for many years, and was paying her account by direct debits of $70.00 per week. She made further purchases of $3,697.00 and $1,977.79 on 22 February 2016, and $953.92 on...

  3. QN v OR [2018] NZDT 1526 (9 February 2018) [pdf, 187 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2018] NZDT 1526 APPLICANTS QN RESPONDENT OR The Tribunal hereby orders: The application by QN and KN and the counterclaim by OR are dismissed. Reasons 1. The applicants, Mr and Mrs N, owned a 2000-acre farm near [location] known as [Farm C]. Mr and Mrs N sold [Farm C] on 1 February 2017. 2. On 7 March 1990, QN and O...

  4. KM and MM v IO Ltd and LC Ltd [2020] NZDT 1408 (15 May 2020) [pdf, 217 KB]

    (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1408 APPLICANT KM and MM FIRST RESPONDENT IO Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT LC Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: IO Ltd is to pay $1000.00 to KM and MM on or before 12 June 2020; and The claim against IO Ltd is dismissed. The issuing of this order has been delayed as a result of the COVID 19 lockdown. Reasons 1. On 19 August 2019, LC Ltd (‘LC

  5. TS v BO & TO [2023] NZDT 97 (22 February 2023) [pdf, 128 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 97 APPLICANT TS FIRST RESPONDENTS BO and TO SECOND RESPONDENT THIRD RESPONDENT WU CX The Tribunal orders: 1. BO and TO are to be removed as Respondents. 2. WU is to be removed as Respondent. 3. The claim against CX is dismissed. Reasons 1. The above parties are the owners of a cross leas...

  6. BD Ltd v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 165 (27 June 2023) [pdf, 92 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 165 APPLICANT BD Ltd RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: Please email the parties. This claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. BD Ltd introduced a potential employment candidate (UI) to a company called N Ltd in July 2020. She was interviewed by N Ltd but subsequently they were unable to offer a position at that time to UI....

  7. UJ v OO LCRO 143 / 2012 (9 April 2013) [pdf, 107 KB]

    LCRO 143/2012 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of a [South Island] Standards Committee BETWEEN MR UJ Applicant AND MR OO Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] This review relates to the conduct of Mr OO when he acted for Mr UJ. The assertio...

  8. Te Manutukutuku Issue 1 [pdf, 2.7 MB]

    ...requirements of propriety. In formally launching this project we hope that it acts as a bridge across cultural gaps and helps to reduce anxiety in the community about the Treaty and about the work of the Waitangi Tribunal. Wira Gardiner Director ; THE CLAIMS PROCESS For most claimants, the decision to lodge an enquiry with the Waitangi Tribunal is the first step in bringing their claim to a formal hearing. Staff of the Waitangi Tribunal then check that the enquiry meets the pro...

  9. TU v GX [2024] NZDT 373 (4 June 2024) [pdf, 122 KB]

    ...GX failed to make herself available for the hearing. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Referee: John Hogan ` Date: 4 June 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

  10. Easthope v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2024] NZACC 001 [pdf, 204 KB]

    ...Easthope v Accident Compensation Corporation [2023] NZACC 158. 2 Background [2] On 17 May 1986, Mr Easthope suffered an accident while playing rugby league. It appears that this accident involved him being spear-tackled to the ground. [3] The claim registration date recorded in the Corporation’s system is 23 March 1989. The Corporation’s records show that it made a lump sum payment to Mr Easthope in 1989, based on an 8% whole person impairment. The Corporation also fun...