Search Results

Search results for claim form.

11426 items matching your search terms

  1. Wu v Manukau City Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 65 [pdf, 77 KB]

    ...memorandum of 14 Page | 3 October 2011 and includes remedial costs, contingency fee, the Prendos project management fee and costs described as additional costs incurred as a result of the change of engineer and cladding type and Mr Marshall’s request. [5] The claimants state that although it was a term of the settlement agreement that the repair contract would be in accordance with NZS3910, Mr Marshall consistently refused to sign the required documentation. The...

  2. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (Privacy Act) [2020] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 353 KB]

    ...emailed to Ms Brown on the same day. The health advisor’s report was not referred to in Ms Brown’s report, as her report had been completed and finalised before the health advisor’s report was received. [9] On 22 January 2016 the Marshalls requested a copy of the findings of the IDEA Services investigation. Ms Brown sent an email to the Marshalls on 26 January 2016, attaching what she described as a letter of her findings. The attachment was the summary report prepared for NA...

  3. MVDT Consent to Extend Jurisdiction form [pdf, 137 KB]

    Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal | Rōpū Take Tautohenga ā-Waka Level 1 | Chorus House| 41 Federal Street | Auckland 1010 DX EX 11086 | Auckland City T: 914 4299| F: 914 5263 MVDT@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz CONSENT TO EXTEND JURISDICTION Pursuant to section 90(1)(b) of the Motor Vehicle Sales Act 2003, the Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal has jurisdiction only if the total sum claimed does not exceed $100,000.00. Despite that restriction, the parties to this clai

  4. EG & EGE v UT & UTU [2016] NZDT 949 (21 April 2016) [pdf, 81 KB]

    ...is dismissed against both respondents. Facts [1] EG and EGE (the applicants) purchased a property from UT and UTU (the respondents) in late 2014 and moved into the property in January 2015. A short time later, the applicants’ neighbour informed them that a large amount of greywater was discharging onto his property. [2] The applicants called in drainage engineers and it was discovered after investigation that water discharging from a shower, basins, laundry tub and washing mac...

  5. Form-24_Criminal-Fixed-D-F.pdf [pdf, 219 KB]

    Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 24 Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules D-F Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Provider number Firm number Court type District Court High Court Court location Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus:...

  6. EK v 2E Ltd [2020] NZDT 1384 (2 December 2020) [pdf, 177 KB]

    ...ingress protection (“IP”) had deteriorated because of age. He also states the phone had clearly suffered impact damage since purchase which would also have contributed to the IP wearing down. NN states the CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 information provided by 2E does not cover the matter of IP in secondhand (albeit refurbished) phones. He also states the warranty does not cover water damage. 7. Purchasers do not have any information available on the 2E website, or provided...

  7. NC & CC v FU Ltd [2020] NZDT 1389 (28 October 2020) [pdf, 101 KB]

    ...provided evidence of those costs and the full amount claimed, apart from the Tribunal filing fee, which cannot be awarded, is to be paid by CD, being $1694.00. Referee: Date: 28 October 2020 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

  8. LF Ltd v DQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 186 (8 November 2022) [pdf, 105 KB]

    ...respondent should bear 60% of the damage, leaving the applicant responsible for the other 40%. The sum payable by the applicant is therefore $999.77. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 8 November 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

  9. N Ltd v NU [2022] NZDT 95 (10 August 2022) [pdf, 106 KB]

    ...caused by a failure to drive with reasonable care and skill. That failure was KL’s and hers alone. 10. Consequently, I have dismissed the claim against NU. Referee: G R Meyer Date: 10th August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

  10. HC v T Ltd [2022] NZDT 214 (14 November 2022) [pdf, 106 KB]

    ...find that for the price paid, and regular and type of use expected, that a reasonable consumer would not expect such a watch to retain all its characteristics and functionality over a 3 year mark. In saying this I had some regard to its continued performance for over a year past the manufacturer’s 2 year warranty (acknowledging this is not the limit under the CGA) and that at least some deterioration could reasonably be expected over this period of time, not limited to wear and tear, e...