Search Results

1. [2025] NZIACDT 02 TX v Liu (13 January 2025) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...WeChat text by ZA (the agent) who claimed to represent employers needing workers for recovery work following floods. Mr Liu replied quoting a fee of $800 for each application. [6] Mr Liu then provided the agent with a link to a questionnaire and requested that each applicant fill in their personal information. The complainant completed the questionnaire on 5 March 2023. [7] RM, an associate of the agent, provided a file of supporting documents concerning the complainant to Mr...

2. [2025] NZIACDT 03 IX v Liu (14 January 2025) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...WeChat text by ZA (the agent) who claimed to represent employers needing workers for recovery work following floods. Mr Liu replied quoting a fee of $800 for each application. [6] Mr Liu then provided the agent with a link to a questionnaire and requested that each applicant fill in their personal information. The complainant completed the questionnaire on 6 March 2023. [7] RM, an associate of the agent, provided a file of supporting documents concerning the complainant to Mr...

3. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Hamilton [2012] NZHRRT 24 [pdf, 120 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2012] NZHRRT 24 Reference No. HRRT 033/2011 IN THE MATTER OF A CLAIM UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND DAVID HAMILTON DEFENDANT AT ASHBURTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms W Gilchrist, Member Hon K Shirley, Member COUNSEL: Ms KT Dalziel for Director of Human Rights Proceedings Mr D Hamilton in person DATE OF HEARING: 16 a...

4. AI v Secretary for Justice 10 August 2012 NZRA 000012 [pdf, 83 KB]

   REVIEW AUTHORITY NEW ZEALAND 2012 NZRA 000012 Applicant AI Respondent Secretary for Justice Date of Decision: 10 August 2012 ________________________________________________________________ DECISION ________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION 1. On the 17th 2. The Secretary communicated advice of that decision to the applicant by letter dated 25 May 2012. May 2012 The Secretary for Justice (‘the Secretary�...

5. Memorandum of Counsel for Guardians of the Bays Incorporated (dated 16 March 2018) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...section 274 parties, in their own right. This memorandum follows Wellington International Airport Limited’s (WIAL) request for an adjournment of its proceedings to a reporting date of 28 September 2018 (to allow WIAL to make progress with its application to the Director General of Civil Aviation (Director) for approval of its proposed Runway Safety Area Extension (RESA)), and the Court’s direction of 1 March that: Any party wishing to comment on the requested adjournment and/o...

6. [2012] NZEmpC 4 Haig v Edgewater Developers Ltd and Others [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 4 [20 January 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 4 ARC 30/10 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF interlocutory applications BETWEEN ROBERT HAIG Plaintiff AND EDGEWATER DEVELOPERS LIMITED First Defendant AND CARRINGTON FARMS LIMITED Second Defendant AND PH II INCORPORATED Third Defendant Hearing: 10 September 2010 (i...

7. Te Manutukutuku Issue 32 [pdf, 5.1 MB]

   ...whiiwhii/Haratua 1995 Number 32 April/May 1995 Ngai Tahu Claim Investigation Ends with Release of Report A recentlY released Waitangi Tribunal report brings to a conclusion the Tribunal investigation into the Ngai Tahu claim . . The Ngai Tahu Ancillary Claims Report 1995 confirms findings made in an earlier 1991 Tribunal report that the Crown had breached its Treaty obligations. This had occurred during the period 1844-1864 by the Crown failing to set aside sufficient la...

8. [2022] NZEmpC 3 Tupe v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa O Tuhoe Trust [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...(the Act). This amount was reduced by a further 30 per cent under s 124. 1 Tupe v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa o Tuhoe Trust [2021] NZERA 411 (Member Eleanor Robinson). 2 Although that success was on a more limited basis than he had claimed. [2] Mr Tupe now wishes to challenge that determination on a de novo basis, but he requires a grant of leave from the Court as the challenge was not filed within the statutory timeframe. The application is opposed by the Trus...

9. DL v ET [2023] NZDT 532 (9 October 2023) [pdf, 201 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 532 APPLICANT DL RESPONDENT ET The Tribunal orders: 1. Both the claim and counterclaim are dismissed. Reasons: 2. DL owns the property on [Address 1] and ET owns [Address 2] which sits below DL’s property. 3. Due to a weather event on 17 July 2021, a retaining wall on the boundary of the two properties partially collapsed. 4....

10. L Ltd v NO [2024] NZDT 113 (23 January 2024) [pdf, 174 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 113 APPLICANT L Ltd RESPONDENT NO APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: NO is to pay $26,361.95 to J Ltd by 7 February 2024. Reasons 1. On 14 September 2022 LC and NO were involved in a collision on [road]. 2. J Ltd claims LC’s vehicle was a write-off because the repair cost of $34,859.95 exceeds the...