12540 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 549 APPLICANT BT Ltd RESPONDENT XN The Tribunal orders: XN is to pay $5701.05 to BT Ltd on or before 8 November 2023. Reasons 1. XN entered into a written storage agreement with BT Ltd (‘BT’) in June 2007 and had paid a monthly rental ever since to store belongings in a unit at their facility. 2. In around 2017 when t...
........................................................................................ 6 AODT defence lawyers ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Applications for a criminal legal aid grant ................................................................................................................... 8 Assignment of AODT legal aid grants ..............................................
...LCRO 159/09 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Wellington Standards Committee 2 BETWEEN MR ALLOA of Wellington Applicant And MR ULLAPOOL of Auckland Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] Mr Alloa (the Applicant) is the sole director and shareholder of a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2015] NZDT 1492 APPLICANT BT & FT FIRST RESPONDENT [Redacted] Council SECOND RESPONDENT [Redacted] Transport THIRD RESPONDENT XQ Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On Tuesday 24 March 2015 at around 8:50 am, FT was driving down [Redacted] Rise,...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 29 APPLICANT QN APPLICANT KI APPLICANT FJ RESPONDENT KN The Tribunal orders: 1. The name of the respondent is amended to KN. 2. KN is to pay to QN the sum of $3,223.99 on or before 21 March 2024. Reasons: 1. FJ was the registered owner of a [vehicle] in September 2023. The car had been paid for by KI. FJ and KI...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 309 APPLICANT BL RESPONDENT SI The Tribunal orders: SI is to pay BL $2,239.00 on or before 26 April 2024. Reasons: 1. BL did some work as a contractor for SI on a farm SI was leasing from her parents. 2. BL now claims $2,239.00 from SI for work done in July 2023. 3. SI denies the claim on the basis that BL did not do any work...
...NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2019] NZEmpC 23 EMPC 250/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to strike out part of the proceedings BETWEEN GEORGINA RACHELLE Plaintiff AND AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: G Rachelle, plaintiff in person P...
...WeChat text by ZA (the agent) who claimed to represent employers needing workers for recovery work following floods. Mr Liu replied quoting a fee of $800 for each application. [6] Mr Liu then provided the agent with a link to a questionnaire and requested that each applicant fill in their personal information. [7] RM, an associate of the agent, provided a file of supporting documents concerning the complainant to Mr Liu on 16 March 2023. This included a form required by Immigr...
...He now seeks to appeal that decision to the High Court. [5] The essential issue for me is whether the questions now raised ought to be determined by the High Court, given their very late emerging nature, the failure to submit the relevant claims to the Corporation for determination and/or the inability of the questions to change the outcome of this appeal. BACKGROUND [6] There is a long history to Mr Chalecki’s claim for compensation for his farming expenses and losses, a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 782 APPLICANT D Ltd RESPONDENT KC The Tribunal orders: 1. KC is to pay D Ltd $14,045.22 on or before 20 December 2023. 2. The remainder of the claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. D Ltd sold and supplied various products to KC on a charge up basis. 2. D Ltd claim $14,703.04 for unpaid invoices and the interest on those invoic...