12922 items matching your search terms
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 764 APPLICANT A Ltd RESPONDENT NT & TH The Tribunal orders: NT and TH are to pay $28,983.69 to A Ltd by 30/12/23. Reasons 1. This order should be read with that dated 11/5/23. 2. In brief A Ltd says that it is contractually entitled to be paid the amount of its invoices 879 and 876 and the installation of a power and/or water “meter” nee...
...of subrogation”. This means an insurer has the right to pursue a third party that the insurer believes caused the loss to its client (the insured) car. As insurer does this to recover amounts it has paid its client. 3. In this case the amount claimed by N Ltd against SB is $10,299.15. 4. The issues to be decided by the Tribunal are: a. Is SB liable in negligence for the damage to QI’s car? b. Is the amount claimed by N Ltd substantiated? Is SB liable in negligence f...
...DISTRICT A20160005718 UNDER Rule 4.10(3), Maori Land Court Rules 2011 IN THE MATTER OF Ruapehu 2 block and a decision of the Deputy Registrar to refuse an application for filing BETWEEN RONALD PERIGO AND MARIA PERIGO Applicants Hearing: 364 Aotea MB 291-296 dated 13 December 2016 Judgment: 17 March 2017 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE S F REEVES Introduction [1] This decision concerns an application by Ronald Perigo and Maria Perigo pursuant...
...LIMITED v LEILANI MAREE PEPPER [2023] NZEmpC 195 [9 November 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 195 EMPC 278/2023 IN THE MATTER OF an application for pre-commencement discovery BETWEEN P.I.C. INSURANCE BROKERS LIMITED Applicant AND LEILANI MAREE PEPPER First Respondent AND GEOFFREY VICTOR COOPER Second Respondent AND OCEANIA INSU...
Gisborne District Council v Aratu Forests Limited IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 190 IN THE MATTER OF an application under s 314 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN GISBORNE DISTRICT COUNCIL (ENV-2024-AKL-131) Applicant AND ARATU FORESTS LIMITED First Respondent AND CASSANDRA ROSE CROWLEY Second Respondent AND MAUI TE KOTUKU TANGOHAU Third Respondent AND MATTHEW DAVIS WAK...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 177 APPLICANT DF RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: Q Ltd is to pay $475.59 to DF on or before 5 May 2023 REASONS Brief Details of Claims 1. On 14 January 2021, DF engaged Q Ltd to manage the rental of her home at [Address] while she was away working in [Country]. A Portfolio Management Agreement was signed by both pa...
...steps had been taken to ensure that having regard to the purpose for which the information was proposed to be used, the information was accurate, up to date, complete, relevant and not misleading. [4] The secondary issue is whether, in a subsequent request by the plaintiffs for access to personal information held by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, the Ministry had proper grounds for withholding certain information under s 27(1)(c) of the Privacy Act 1993. The Minist...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 713 APPLICANT KO RESPONDENT TC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. KO purchased goods through [online] marketplace from TC. KO arranged a courier pick-up of the goods but says only some of the purchased goods were in the package TC provided to the courier. 2. KO says he is entitled to a refund of $160....
...expressly say so, its effect was restricted to declining cover for the mental consequences of the 1985 injury. Mr Guilford continued to obtain coverage for the physical consequences of that accident. The Corporation had in fact treated Dr Eyers’ request as a new claim, so the original coverage of the accident was unaffected. [7] Mr Guilford filed an application for review of the 22 August 1997 decision many years later, on 12 October 2015. The Corporation accepts he had not bee...
...WeChat text by ZA (the agent) who claimed to represent employers needing workers for recovery work following floods. Mr Liu replied quoting a fee of $800 for each application. [6] Mr Liu then provided the agent with a link to a questionnaire and requested that each applicant fill in their personal information. The complainant completed the questionnaire on 7 March 2023. [7] RM, an associate of the agent, provided a file of supporting documents concerning the complainant to Mr...