Search Results

1. [2013] NZEmpC 9 Gini v Strugess [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...employer regardless of any notion of labelling and limitation of liability” and thirdly, that there was “a compelling argument for lifting the corporate veil.” The strike out determination [5] Counsel for the defendant, Mr Cleary, made application to the Authority to have the claims against Ms Sturgess dismissed on the grounds that there was no employment relationship between her and Ms Gini. In a determination 3 dated 23 February 2011, the Authority dismissed Mr Cleary�€...

2. ACC Fixed Fee Schedule updated 29 Sep 22 [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...For • Attending a Judicial meeting Re-preparation Re-preparation prior to hearing 3 $160 For • Re-preparation for a hearing just prior to the date of hearing District Court Appeal Where the listed provider did not represent the applicant at review $1,580 For • Taking instructions, attending the client • Reviewing ACC files and other relevant material • Preparing application for legal aid • Identifying legal and factual issues • Preparation and filin...

3. Warren v Harwood - Hongoeka 7 Block and Lots 2 and 3 on DP 42094 (2007) 197 Aotea MB 299 (197 AOT 299) [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   ...AOTEA DISTRICT Hearings: Counsel : Judgment: A2006025588 UNDER Section 322, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Hongoeka 7 Block and Lots 2 and 3 on DP 42094 BETWEEN BRIAN PETER WARREN, VEREKER TE AMOMA TE RANGIHAETA AND Applicants MR IAN HARWOOD Respondent 179 Aotea MB 272-277 dated 30 November 2006 183 Aotea MB 120-121 dated 16 March 2007 189 Aotea MB 236-257 dated 26 July 2007 189 Aotea MB 155-157dated 1 August 2007 196 Aotea MB 102-122 dated 22 Novem...

4. BO v YL [2015] NZDT 773 (13 April 2015) [pdf, 16 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2015] NZDT 773 BETWEEN BO APPLICANT AND YL RESPONDENT AND YLY LIMITED SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 13 April 2015 Referee: Referee Smallholme ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that YL, a division of YLY Limited, is to pay BO the sum of $2,127.70 with payment to be made by 5 pm on Friday 27 April 2015. Reasons [1] BO claims $2,527.70 from his insurer, YL (a division o...

5. EI v JM Ltd [2023] NZDT 637 (6 November 2023) [pdf, 92 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 637 APPLICANT EI RESPONDENT JM Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. In November 2022, EI started his [truck], when he put his foot on the accelerator, water was sucked through the air filter into the engine resulting in the engine being damaged. 2. EI seeks $30,000.00 from his insurance compan...

6. SN v BN Ltd [2017] NZDT 1456 (6 July 2017) [pdf, 206 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2017] NZDT 1456 APPLICANT SN RESPONDENT BN Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: BN Limited is to pay the sum of $1804.35 to SN on or before Thursday 20 July 2017. Reasons: 1. In March 2016, Mr N’s old ensuite vanity unit was replaced with a new vanity under his insurance policy with BN Limited. By the end of the year...

7. BW v NK [2024] NZDT 27 (19 February 2024) [pdf, 94 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 27 APPLICANT BW RESPONDENT NK The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In July 2023, BW agreed to purchase a [Car], from NK through [Website] for $4,700.00. In September 2023, BW contacted NK asking for a refund because the car had significant mechanical problems. 2. BW says the condition of the car has be...

8. AX & KX v WB [2023] NZDT 246 (20 April 2023) [pdf, 201 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 246 APPLICANT AX and KX RESPONDENT WB The Tribunal orders: 1. WB is to pay to AX and KX the sum of $637.23 on or before 12 May 2023. Reasons 1. AX and KX undertook fence repairs on their boundary with WB. They filed a claim seeking to be compensated for the cost of the repairs, and collection costs. The cla...

9. UD v XI Ltd [2024] NZDT 345 (29 April 2024) [pdf, 86 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 345 APPLICANT UD RESPONDENT XI Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. UD bought a new build home from XI Ltd in September 2009. UD says the shower liner in the ensuite shower has now detached from the wall. He seeks an order that XI Ltd is liable to pay him $6,000.00, which he says is the cost to fix the sh...

10. [2019] NZEmpC 27 Barbara Buckett & Assoc t/a Buckett Law v Farani [pdf, 206 KB]

    ...B Buckett, counsel for plaintiff Judgment: 13 March 2019 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [Application for substituted service] [1] This matter commenced life in the Employment Relations Authority as a claim against an ex-employee for breach of the employment agreement, the statutory duty of good faith, and breach of the implied term of fidelity. The Authority dismissed the plaintiff’s claim finding that there was no employment relationsh...