Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12540 items matching your search terms

  1. EB & KB v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 288 (11 November 2022) [pdf, 210 KB]

    ...to EB on or before Friday 25 November 2022. 2. D Ltd is to pay the further sum of $49.28 to EB on or before Friday 25 November 2022 if this sum has not already been paid. Reasons: 1. The respondent D Ltd is the former property manager for the applicants. The applicants are unhappy with the services provided in relation to two tenancies, the first from December 2018 to March 2022, and the second from 12 to 27 March 2022. 2. The applicants now claim $4,870.00 from the respondent, comp...

  2. NE & TE v SS [2024] NZDT 586 (6 September 2024) [pdf, 183 KB]

    ...APPLICANT NE APPLICANT TE RESPONDENT SS APPLICANT'S INSURER W Ltd The Tribunal orders: SS is to pay W Ltd the total sum of $4,518.17 on or before Friday 27 September 2024. From this sum, W Ltd is to pay the Applicants the $500.00 insurance excess. Reasons: 1. NE who also represented his wife TE at the hearing, claims that on 14 November 2023, SS threw a bucket of yellow paint onto their property causing damage. NE and SE (the Applicants) an...

  3. SN v K Ltd [2022] NZDT 117 (15 August 2022) [pdf, 108 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 115 APPLICANT SN RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. SN and K Ltd purchased adjoining pieces of land at a new subdivision. SN owns [Property 1], and her house was finished first. SN’s builder advised her that a retaining wall needed to be constructed before a fence could be built...

  4. MT v UI [2022] NZDT 54 (9 May 2022) [pdf, 148 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 54 APPLICANT MT RESPONDENT UI APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) X Ltd The Tribunal orders: UI is to pay X Ltd the sum of $8,500.20 on or before 7 June 2022. X Ltd is to pay the first $1,000.00 of that sum to MT. Reasons: 1. UI undertook hedge trimming work for MT. MT now claims that UI put the hedg...

  5. QQ v IK & YM [2023] NZDT 357 (22 June 2023) [pdf, 150 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 357 APPLICANT QQ FIRST RESPONDENT IK SECOND RESPONDENT YM The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 1 December 2022, QQ bought a 2013 [car] from IK. He says IK misrepresented the vehicle and he claims compensation of $4,999.00. 2. On 8 March, the Tribunal added IK’s wife Y...

  6. I Ltd v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 71 (10 February 2023) [pdf, 216 KB]

    ...having substantial technical expertise. It is imperative that all aspects of any intended use be analysed and all pertinent information be reviewed concerning the component or system in a current product catalogue. Due to the diversity of possible applications and operating conditions for these components and systems, the user, through its own analysis, testing and evaluation, is solely responsible for making the final selection of the products and systems and ensuring that all safety warn...

  7. BD v J Ltd ES [2021] NZDT 1648 (24 June 2021) [pdf, 129 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1648 APPLICANT BD RESPONDENT J Limited SECOND RESPONDENT ES The Tribunal orders: 1. BD is to pay J Limited the sum of $3,753.42 on or before 15 July 2021. 2. BD’s claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 29 June 2020 ES was driving towards Auckland on State Highway 16 in lane 4. He indicated to change lanes,...

  8. BH v JT [2024] NZDT 65 (17 January 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 65 APPLICANT BH RESPONDENT JT APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) W Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by BH is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 16 August 2023, BH’s [vehicle] was damaged while it was parked outside [address]. BH’s daughter who was the driver at the time believed the damage was caused by JT...

  9. SM v CT [2020] NZDT 1432 (4 August 2020) [pdf, 223 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1432 APPLICANT SM RESPONDENT CT The Tribunal orders: CT is to pay SMSM $3,400.00 by Friday 28 August 2020. Reasons 1. SM purchased a vehicle from CT for $3,400.00. According to text messages from CT to SM, CT said he had purchased the vehicle from a friend who left the country. A finance company has a se...

  10. ZY v BT [2024] NZDT 144 (8 April 2024) [pdf, 40 KB]

    Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 144 APPLICANT person or organisation making the original claim ZY RESPONDENT person or organisation originally claimed against BT OTHER PARTY J Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd Result of application for rehearing: Rehearing Refused The Order of 13 December 2023 stands. Reasons for decision: 1. BT applies for...