12535 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 361 APPLICANT LG RESPONDENT DG The Tribunal orders: DG is to pay LG the sum of $5,200.00 on or before Wednesday 9 August 2023. Background: 1. On 21 March 2023 LG sold her [car] to DG for $5,700, to paid in three payments, the last of which was to be paid on 31 March 2023. 2. The terms of the sal...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 197 APPLICANT QN RESPONDENT UN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 15 November 2023, QN went to UN to buy 2 half wine barrels that were on special. QN enlisted the help of a young male staff member of slight build to assist him in selecting, carrying the barrels to QN’s vehicle and loading them...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 84 APPLICANT NX RESPONDENT B Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER X Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER Y Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by NX is dismissed. Background 1. NX engaged B Ltd to carry out an assessment of his ducted heating system which appeared to be having problems. 2. A tradesperson from B Ltd came out on a F...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 673 APPLICANT DF RESPONDENT FX APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: FX shall pay J Ltd $7,038.69 by 23 November 2023, or according to any payment arrangement agreed to by J Ltd by that date. Any default on such a payment arrangement shall render the full remaining balance due within 10 working days of default. R...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 525 APPLICANT LI RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Background 1. LI lives in [Town 1]. 2. On 9 August 2023, LI arrived at [City 1] airport from overseas travel. He was planning to fly to [City 2] for several days before returning [Region]. 3. He had a large and heavy bag with him from his over...
...MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20170004105 UNDER Section 238, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Pukemakoiti 2 and 4 Block BETWEEN BARBARA TANIORA AS TRUSTEE OF THE TANIORA MARU WHĀNAU TRUST Applicant AND MARY CROWN, MOERA HUGHES, GRAEME KILGOUR, WEO MAAG, MORGAN RATA, THOMAS TUWHANGAI AND RAYMOND WI AS TRUSTEES OF THE PUKEMAKOITI TRUST Respondent Hearings: 18 June 2018, 387 Aotea MB 126-136 7 December 2017...
...illegal strike. This is because the requirements of s 83(b) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the ER Act) would not be met since the proposed strikes do not relate to bargaining for a collective agreement but to bargaining for a pay equity claim. [3] The defendant strongly opposed the application. It said the strike and proposed strike, if they were to proceed, would be legal, and that the application for relief should be dismissed. Background The parties [4] The part...
...unconditional offer on TZ’s property on 24 October 2021 in a multiple-offer situation and their offer was accepted the same day. Settlement took place on 2 December 2021. 2. During removal of vinyl planks from the garage floor after settlement, the applicants’ builder noticed wide cracks which were subsequently determined by a structural engineer to be the result of compromised structural foundation capacity due to soil settlement. 3. VE and BU claim $22,000.00 being the cost...
...orders: A. BT is added as Second Respondent. B. B Ltd, as the Second Respondent’s insurer, is to pay UQ and XQ $4,704.15 on or before 12 January 2024. Reasons 1. On or about 22 October 2022, a collision between the cars belonging to the Applicants and the Second Respondent occurred. Both parties had insurance, and the Second Respondent was held liable for the damage. The Applicants’ insurance company (C Ltd) took about 12 weeks to arrange a repair, during which time th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1633 APPLICANT JU Ltd RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: U Ltd is to pay JU Ltd the sum of $2,111.79 on or before 20 November 2021. Reasons: 1. JU Ltd owns a rental property, insured with U Ltd. The policy includes accidental and malicious damage by the tenants. In December 2020 the tenants moved out, and JU...