12730 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 775 APPLICANT QU RESPONDENT LG The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. QU purchased a horse, [The horse], from LG in December 2021. The parties agree that LG represented that [The horse] was suitable for show jumping. QU believes that this was a misrepresentation and claims: a. A refund of the $12,000.00...
...that amount. [7] The narration of her invoice is as follows: My fee for professional attendances in respect of receiving charges, including attendances on yourselves and Police, attending to execution of Official Information & Privacy Act forms for request of disclosure of Police file, serving same on Police, all attendances at Auckland District Court for bail and resolution of charges, reporting to you and to all incidental matters thereto. [8] The timesheet provided by the...
...TRIBUNAL 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020 Dear Minister Pursuant to section 87 of the Motor Vehicle Sales Act 2003 (the Act) we are pleased to submit the following Annual Report. In this Annual Report we: 1. Summarise the applications the Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal has dealt with during the year. 2. Explain how those applications were resolved. 3. Detail cases which, in our opinion, require special mention. 4. Highlight the Tribunal’s incre...
...[2023] NZLCRO 145 Ref: LCRO 126/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN EG Applicant AND HJ Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] The applicant has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Commit...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 124 APPLICANT DM RESPONDENT QB Limited The Tribunal orders: QB Limited is to pay DM the total sum of $995.00 by Friday 30 June 2023. Reasons: 1. DM claims that on 13 April 2022 he purchased a [GPS wireless car play stereo unit] (the unit) for his [car] for $565.00 from QB Limited (the company), and also arranged for the company to...
1 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6032: HELEN DODD – 62A GODDEN CRESCENT, MISSION BAY ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Helen Dodd is the owner of a house in Godden Crescent, Mission Bay. Although accepting that the house is a leaky home, both the assessor and the chi...
1 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6247: MICHAEL HEPBURN, SHARON HEPBURN AND TRACY MACKINNON – 28 IMRAN TERRACE, KHANDALLAH ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Michael Hepburn, Sharon Hepburn and Tracy MacKinnon are the owners of a house at 28 Imran Terrace, Khanda...
...Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 7 APPLICANT CT APPLICANT ID RESPONDENT S Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 11 March 2021 CT and ID (the applicants) engaged S Limited (SL) to perform a pre- purchase inspection report on [address] (the property). 2. Some months after purchasing the property, the applicants became aware of issues with the windows and water ingress. 3. The ap...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 517 APPLICANT B Ltd RESPONDENT UE SECOND RESPONDENT SE The Tribunal orders: 1. B Ltd’s claim is dismissed. Reasons: 2. In August 2022 B Ltd (the applicant) entered into a contract with UE and SE (the respondents) for concept plans, developed design, detailed design and managing building consents for ext...
...COETZEE v OAMARU MEATS LIMITED [2020] NZEmpC 187 [10 November 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 187 EMPC 326/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application to extend time to challenge a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN VERNON COETZEE Applicant AND OAMARU MEATS LIMITED Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances:...