Search Results

1. Beattie v Official Assignee [2021] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...a proceeding is a derogation from the principle that the parties have a right to be present throughout the hearing, the open evidence and submissions must contain as much as can be said in support of the withholding ground without compromising the claim that the information was lawfully withheld from the requester. Expressed another way, the closed evidence and submissions must be strictly confined to that which is necessary for the agency to justify the withholding decision under ss 27 a...

2. NN v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 410 (6 July 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 410 APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In March 2023, NN purchased a [electric bike] from C Ltd in [City]. NN says the assurance from sales staff that the bike was also able to charge his phone was a critical factor in his purchase. NN quickly discovered however...

3. BE v IC [2023] NZDT 646 (29 November 2023) [pdf, 145 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 646 APPLICANT BE RESPONDENT IC The Tribunal orders: IC is to pay BE $2,120.00 on or before 20 December 2023. Reasons 1. BE bought a [vehicle] from IC via Trademe for $3,800.00. It was advertised as being in great condition for its age and having no issues apart from minor scrapes on front and rear bumper. However, the first day that...

4. NN v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 410 (6 July 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 410 APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In March 2023, NN purchased a [electric bike] from C Ltd in [City]. NN says the assurance from sales staff that the bike was also able to charge his phone was a critical factor in his purchase. NN quickly discovered however...

5. SO v GU [2023] NZDT 326 (26 May 2023) [pdf, 156 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 326 APPLICANT SO RESPONDENT GU The Tribunal orders: GU is to pay SO the sum of $150.00 within 28 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. On 3 August 2022, the parties entered into a contract for the sale and purchase of a property at [Town] with a settlement date on 30 September 2022....

6. AA v BB [2024] NZDT 80 (26 February 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 80 APPLICANT AA RESPONDENT BB The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In December 2016, AA and her adult son (BB) came to New Zealand. This is a very sad family dispute between a mother and her only child concerning items purchased for him and her son’s counterclaim ag...

7. WU v QW [2024] NZDT 275 (13 May 2024) [pdf, 99 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 275 APPLICANT WU RESPONDENT QW The Tribunal orders: 1. QW is to pay WU $902.25 on or before 30 May 2024. 2. Payment is to be made by way of direct credit to account number [account number]. Reasons: 1. WU purchased a steer (a castrated bull) from QW for $600.00 through a local [online] page. Sometime after the steer was delivered...

8. MG v TX & QD [2021] NZDT 1631 (30 June 2021) [pdf, 188 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1631 APPLICANT MG RESPONDENT TX SECOND RESPONDENT QD The Tribunal orders: TX and QD are to pay MG $30,000.00 by 15 July 2021. Background 1. MG is TX’s daughter. 2. TX and QD own a farm property in [Settlement A]. 3. In 2016 there were conversations between QD, TX, MG, and MG’s then partner about ca...

9. DM Ltd v GD Ltd [2022] NZDT 188 (30 September) [pdf, 99 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 188 APPLICANT DM Ltd RESPONDENT GD Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT TP Ltd THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT UD Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER JC Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 12 February 2020, DM Ltd was notified that customers had lost internet service...

10. NI v LNE Ltd [2020] NZDT 1316 (23 November 2020) [pdf, 117 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1316 APPLICANT NI RESPONDENT LNE Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT WXT Pty Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed Reasons 1. NI is claiming the Infrastructure Growth Charge (IGC) from LNE Ltd (LNE) for $13,823.00 which was charged by WXT Pty Ltd (WXT). She refers to clause 19 of the sale and purchase agre...