12535 items matching your search terms
1 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6247: MICHAEL HEPBURN, SHARON HEPBURN AND TRACY MACKINNON – 28 IMRAN TERRACE, KHANDALLAH ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Michael Hepburn, Sharon Hepburn and Tracy MacKinnon are the owners of a house at 28 Imran Terrace, Khanda...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1565 APPLICANT NL RESPONDENT BU Ltd The Tribunal orders: BU Ltd is to pay NL the sum of $420.00 on or before 18 August 2021. Reasons: 1. On 6th June 2021 NL was parked at CT while visiting DG Gym. She came out of the DG gym approximately 45 minutes later and discovered that her car had been towed. She then le...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 130 APPLICANT MN RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. O Ltd is to pay MN $849.00 on or before 10 May 2024. 2. The remainder of the claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. MN after watching a video for O Ltd Village, in which QX presented the village as a secure gated community, she purchased a unit and moved in. 2. MN says tha...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 9 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1621 APPLICANT SN APPLICANT TN RESPONDENT B LTD The Tribunal orders: B LTD is to pay to TN and SN the sum of $28,353.40 on or before 28 January 2022. Reasons: 1. In October 2018, SN & TN booked a trip to travel to Europe in June 2019. They purchased travel insurance for their trip. The insurance was...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 283 APPLICANT BX APPLICANT JD RESPONDENT ML The Tribunal orders: 1. ML is to pay $9,000.00 to JD on or before 23 January 2023. Reasons: 2. This matter had previously been part heard and adjourned for ML to seek legal advice. 3. On 19 August 2022 at approximately 6.30pm JD was driving his Toyota truck alo...
...remaining $2,725.50, and emailed an invoice for the total sum. Mrs QS did not believe she had authorised the advertising fee, and was also unhappy with the quality of the sample advertisements. She requested a refund, which GJG refused. [3] SQS now claims $5,451.00, representing a full refund of the two payments that make up GJG’s twelve-month advertising fee. It does not claim any refund of GJG’s “ad creation” fee of $99.00 plus GST. Issues [4] The issues to be dete...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 126 APPLICANT EU RESPONDENT BQ The Tribunal orders: BQ is ordered to pay EU the sum of $3,447.50. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 21 July 2023. Reasons: 1) There was no appearance of the respondent and the hearing proceeded in his absence. On 27 February 2023 the applicant bought a vehicle from the responden...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 334 APPLICANT HK and QK RESPONDENT JF Ltd The Tribunal orders, on the claim and counter-claim: JF Ltd is to pay HK and QK the sum of $5021.38 on or before 23 June 2023. Reasons 1. HK and QK contracted JF Ltd to provide landscaping services and materials for their new swimming pool, including the laying of copi
...JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for costs - s 148, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] These are appeals from: (1) the decision of the Corporation on 28 October 2020 awarding costs following the resolution of a series of review applications; and (2) the decision of a Reviewer dated 24 March 2021 dismissing a series of review applications and making a limited award of costs. 2 Background [2] On 31 March 2020, the Corporation referred a Training for Ind...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 12 APPLICANT CL RESPONDENT ND The Tribunal orders: ND is to pay CL $685.71 within 28 days. Reasons [1] CL and ND were flatmates. They signed an agreement on 7 May 2022, in which CL was described as the head tenant. Weekly rent was to be $200.00, and a bond of $4000.00 was payable by ND. Under the agreement, ND was obliged, i...