Search Results

1. Katu v Peni - Tiroa E and Te Hape B (2015) 105 Waikato Maniapoto MB 157 (105 WMN 157) [pdf, 405 KB]

   ...then undertook a further review of the remuneration for the Executive Chairperson on 26 June 2014. [48] The trustees subsequently engaged Everest Group Human Resource Specialists (Everest Group HR) to review the position in terms of the back pay requested by Mr Peni. As a result of that review, the trustees made a full and final settlement for back pay to Mr Peni. That matter is currently in the process of being resolved and again will be discussed in more detail in relation to t...

2. Dixon v Dixon [pdf, 75 KB]

   WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-101-000026 BETWEEN LLOYD & JOANNE DIXON Claimant AND PETER THOMAS DIXON AND DARRYL THOMAS DIXON AS TRUSTEES OF THE PETER DIXON FAMILY TRUST First Respondent AND KEY HOMES TAURANGA LIMITED Second Respondent AND NEIL PAGE Third Respondent AND MICHAEL COOK (REMOVED) Fourth Respondent AND WILLIAM NICHOLSON Fifth Respondent AND JOHN TURNER Sixth Respondent AND MALCOLM HUNT S

3. Sax v Commissioner of Police (Strike-Out – Discrimination) [2022] NZHRRT 33 [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...that Ms Sax has failed to: [3.1] Prosecute her proceedings to trial and judgment; and [3.2] Explain, when required, the reasons for the prolonged non-compliance with timetable orders. [4] Regrettably there has been a delay in determining the application due to the backlog of work in the Tribunal, which has arisen for the reasons set out in Wall v Fairfax New Zealand Ltd (Delay) [2017] NZHRRT 8 at [2]. [5] On 6 July 2022, a Minute was issued which advised the parties the Tribunal was...

4. FC Ltd v TN & JM [2021] NZDT 1626 (10 August 2021) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...& JM and HN at the property. EL said that HN had told him that his parents wanted a complete modernisation of the flat. EL said that TN & JM had said that their budget was in the vicinity of $100,000.00 for the work. He also said that he had informed HN that FC LTD charged 2% of the sum that would be provided to TN & JM as a quote. If the quote were to be accepted by TN & JM, that figure would be absorbed into the total contract price, but if the quote were not accepted, it...

5. Rameka - Papamoa 2 Sec 2B3C3B1 [2016] Chief Judge's MB 457 (2016 CJ 457) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A20100005313 CJ 2010/3 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF PAPAMOA 2 SEC 2B3C3B1 and an order made at 80 Tauranga MB 242-243 on 30 March 2005 BETWEEN MARAMA RAMEKA Applicant Judgment: 09 June 2016 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2016 Chief Judge’s MB 458 Introduction [1]...

6. S Ltd v CD & K Ltd [2023] NZDT 788 (5 November 2023) [pdf, 105 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 788 APPLICANT S Ltd RESPONDENT CD SECOND RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: K Ltd and CD are jointly and severally liable to pay S Ltd $4,722.18 on or before Friday 1 December 2023. Reasons: 1. In October 2021 S Ltd opened a trade account for K Ltd, which was personally guaranteed by the majority shareholder fo...

7. CF v EX [2021] NZDT 1623 (13 July 2021) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...possession of the unfinished pod and had someone else complete the work and installation. He was charged $1,050.00 for this by the other provider. He sought a refund of the $1,200.00 he had paid to EX, and when this was not forthcoming, he filed a claim in the Disputes Tribunal. 3. This is a claim by CF for $1,200.00 for breach of contract by EX. 4. The issues to be determined were as follows: a. Was there a legally binding contract between the parties, in particular did the pa...

8. IAA v van Zyl [2012] NZIACDT 37 (31 July 2012) [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...[6] The first component is whether Mr van Zyl discharged his professional obligations by checking the papers, and filing them. The questions that arise are: [6.1] Was it lawful for people who were not licensed immigration advisers to gather the information, and interact with Mr K? [6.2] Even if it was lawful, was it an acceptable way of discharging Mr van Zyl’s professional duty to these clients? [7] The second ground of complaint is that Mr van Zyl misled Immigration New Zealand,...

9. Dodd [pdf, 90 KB]

   1 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6032: HELEN DODD – 62A GODDEN CRESCENT, MISSION BAY ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Helen Dodd is the owner of a house in Godden Crescent, Mission Bay. Although accepting that the house is a leaky home, both the assessor and the chi...

10. [2016] NZEmpC 43 Pretorius v Marra Construction (2004) Ltd [pdf, 159 KB]

    ...AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 43 EMPC 14/2016 IN THE MATTER OF an application for special leave to remove matter to the Employment Court pursuant to s 178(3) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN FREDRICK PRETORIUS Applicant AND MARRA CONSTRUCTION (2004) LIMITED Respondent Hearing: (on the papers filed 26 January, 25 February, 11 and 23 March 2016) Counsel: D Jacobson, counsel for the applicant K Patterson, counsel for the...