Search Results

1. Rafiq v Department of Internal Affairs [2013] NZHRRT 11 [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...Member REPRESENTATION: Mr R Rafiq in person (no appearance) Mr S Cohen-Ronen for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 12 and 13 April 2012 DATE OF DECISION: 8 April 2013 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL Introduction [1] On 9 November 2009 Mr Rafiq requested access to the personal information held about him by the Department of Internal Affairs. By letter dated 18 November 2009 the Department provided some information but other information was withheld pursuant to s 27(1)(c) of the Priv...

2. LCRO 78/2019 EW v PT and AM (3 February 2021) [pdf, 142 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2021] NZLCRO 017 Ref: LCRO 78/2019 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of [AREA] Standards Committee X BETWEEN EW Applicant AND PT and AM Respondents The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr EW filed an Appli...

3. BU & SI v UQ & CQ [2024] NZDT 811 (20 December 2024) [pdf, 99 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 811 APPLICANT BU APPLICANT SI RESPONDENT UQ SECOND RESPONDENT CQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicants, BU and SI purchased [address] (“the house”) from the respondents, UQ and CQ. 2. A conditional offer was made on 19 March 2024 which included a condition that allowed for a...

4. Rehearings, appeals & stay of proceedings

   ...Both the landlord and the tenant can apply for a rehearing. You have 5 working days after the decision is issued to apply for a rehearing.  You do not need to pay a filing fee. You can use this form to apply for a rehearing. You can submit your application at the District Court where the original hearing took place.  You can send your application by email, by courier, or post or you can take into the court in person. Court contact information, including physical and email address is a...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Tenancy

5. TD v SN [2022] NZDT 99 (19 September 2022) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...scan, Austen would have to be put down. TD paid $5,000 to the vet. 5. The MRI scan revealed no sign of a dog bite, and that the partial paralysis Austen was suffering from was caused by a congenital condition, Syringomyelia, exacerbated by some form of trauma, such as a dog bite to the neck, a hard pull on a lead and possibly even Austen violently shaking himself. 6. The vet bills came to an additional $1,639.79 which, in view of the diagnosis, TD told the vet she would not pay....

6. NP v KT [2021] NZDT 1706 (12 October 2021) [pdf, 243 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1706 APPLICANT NP RESPONDENT KT The Tribunal orders: Under both claims NP is to pay KT $1,080.00 on or before 5.00pm on 9 November 2021 Reasons 1. NP contacted KT, an arborist trading as QUT, about tree work she wanted carried out at her property. The call was prompted by her concern that an elm tree, which was leaning over,...

7. C Ltd v EN [2023] NZDT 611 (22 November 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 611 APPLICANT C Ltd RESPONDENT EN The Tribunal orders: EN is to pay C Ltd $1191.91 on or before the 12th day of December 2023. The money may be paid into account number [redacted]. Reasons: Introduction: 1. EN had entered into a contract with C Ltd on a 3G unlimited plan. 2. XX was the network owner and operator....

8. SW v L Ltd [2023] NZDT 93 (20 March 2023) [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...was to pay the remaining $1000 at a later date. 2. SW started having issues with the vehicle. She reported these to L Ltd and asked for their help. L Ltd responded but as it would not uplift the car and repair it at their cost, SW filed her claim in the Tribunal seeking to cancel the contract, payment of a full refund and associated costs, and for L Ltd to uplift the car. 3. The issues to be decided are: i. Has there been a breach of the guarantee of acceptable quality in the...

9. P Ltd v AH & LH [2023] NZDT 51 (31 January 2023) [pdf, 120 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 51 APPLICANT P Ltd RESPONDENT AH SECOND RESPONDENT LH The Tribunal orders: The claim by P Ltd against AH and LH is proved and AH and LH are to pay P Ltd $15,679.50 on or by 5:00pm on 28 February 2023. Reasons 1. On 08 January 2020, P Ltd entered into an agency agreement with AH and LH for the sale of a l...

10. IN & SC v B Ltd [2020] NZDT 1640 (16 November 2020) [pdf, 169 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 8 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1640 APPLICANT IN and SC Trustees of M Trust RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 15 May 2012, IN and SC as trustees of M Trust (the “Trust”) purchased Unit Z at [address], [Suburb] in a unit title development from B Ltd (“the B Ltd”) in a mortgagee sale. IN h...