12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 44 APPLICANT NL APPLICANT TG RESPONDENT JN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. NL and TG live next door to a property that is co-owned by JN. 2. Their claim relates to problems with the behaviour of former occupants of that property, in particular that they threw rubbish over the fence onto NL and TG’s l...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 445 APPLICANT HM RESPONDENT F The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. HM is a member of the F [airline loyalty programme] under which a member may earn [loyalty points] (Points) when flying with F. She says on 31 December 2022 F cancelled 187,928 of her Points without any war...
...statement of claim or statement of defence or other intended pleading, and an affidavit explaining the reasons for the delay and any mitigating factors or other relevant information bearing upon the grant or refusal of leave. A memorandum from the applicant’s representative addressing other relevant matters will also be appreciated by the Court. 7. Electronic filing Until the Court’s obligations under the Electronic Transactions Act 2002 and under the Judicature Modernisat...
...• clearly unfair (‘manifestly unreasonable’) and/or • ‘wrong in law’. You can’t ask for a review just because you disagree with the decision. What decisions can the Tribunal review? The Tribunal can review decisions about: • applications and claims for legal aid, including declining your application • how much legal aid you can get • how much legal aid you may have to repay • the conditions of a legal aid grant • stopping or changing a grant • a charg...
...maintenance. A dispute arose about the repair invoice. F Ltd agreed to waive the $150.00 call out fee but have placed the balance of $427.50 with debt collectors. 2. EQ wants to cancel the contract and get a full refund of the $3,025.00 paid and requests an order that he not liable to pay the repair invoice of $427.50. 3. The issues to be resolved are: (a) Is EQ entitled to cancel the contract and get a refund of $3,025.00? (i) Was the treadmill of acceptable quality? (ii) If...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 550 APPLICANT DS RESPONDENT HW The Tribunal orders: 1) HW’s claim against DS is struck out. 2) DS’s claim against HW is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 10 April 2021, DS took his son’s motorbike engine to HW for repairs and parts. He said that the bike was working but jumped when it was kickstarted. He paid $800.00 to...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2015] NZDT 778 BETWEEN BY LIMITED APPLICANT AND BYB SECOND APPLICANT AND YB RESPONDENT AND YBY SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 5 May 2015 Referee: Referee Smallholme ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim in relation to the legality of the drainage installed by BY Limited and BYB is struck out. The claim in relation to fencing costs and legal fees is...
...Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Whakatōhea - an application for review of an order made pursuant to s 30, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 at 69 Opotiki MB 11-26 dated 2 February 1994 BETWEEN ADRIANA EDWARDS Applicant Hearing: 5-7 March 2018 (Heard at Ōhope) Coram: Appearances: Judge C T Coxhead (Presiding) K Prime H W Colbert C Hirschfeld, T Sinclar and B Tupara for the Applicant C Linkhorn, G Gilli...
...WeChat text by ZA (the agent) who claimed to represent employers needing workers for recovery work following floods. Mr Liu replied quoting a fee of $800 for each application. [6] Mr Liu then provided the agent with a link to a questionnaire and requested that each applicant fill in their personal information. The complainant completed the questionnaire on 30 March 2023. [7] RM, an associate of the agent, provided a file of supporting documents concerning the complainant to Mr...
...WeChat text by ZA (the agent) who claimed to represent employers needing workers for recovery work following floods. Mr Liu replied quoting a fee of $800 for each application. [6] Mr Liu then provided the agent with a link to a questionnaire and requested that each applicant fill in their personal information. The complainant completed the questionnaire on 7 March 2023. [7] RM, an associate of the agent, provided a file of supporting documents concerning the complainant to Mr...