12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 281 APPLICANT LB RESPONDENT MX SECOND RESPONDENT BJ Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER BB Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 18 September 2022 LB was approaching the [roundabout], heading south. MX was driving in the same direction. LB claims that MX crossed into her la...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 641 APPLICANT GX RESPONDENT J Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. GX had insurance policies with [bank], underwritten by J Ltd. On 4 February 2024, the camper van driven GX broke down. As GX believed he had Roadside Assist insurance cover, he called [the bank’s] Roadside Assist line and advised the camper...
...Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the ruling of a Reviewer dated 14 April 2022. The Reviewer issued a procedural ruling in relation to Fulton Hogan’s decision dated 10 November 2021 declining Mr’s Coldrick’s request for physiotherapy. Background [2] On 25 February 2020, Mr Coldrick twisted his right knee while standing on a boulder at work. His GP, Dr McGuire, lodged a claim for cover for a sprain of the right knee/leg. On 27 March 2020, th...
...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. 2 [3] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: the application for review and attached submissions; the letter from Graha...
...2024, the Court dismissed the application by Dr Van Wey Lovatt, for leave to appeal to the High Court from the Costs Decision of Judge Spiller dated 20 May 2024 (“the Application). The Accident Compensation Corporation (the Corporation) now claims costs on the Application. [2] The Corporation claims costs on a Category 2B scale in the sum of $2,674.00. Mr Evans, as counsel for the Corporation, submits that if this was an ordinary proceeding, there are factors that would have jus...
...___________________________________________________________________________ Introduction [1] On 25 November 2024, this Court issued a judgment in favour of the appellant.1 The Court directed that Ms de Marco was entitled to reasonable disbursements in the appeal. The first application [2] Ms de Marco lodged a claim for disbursements on 30 January 2025, outlining the aspects of improper conduct by the Corporation and certain medical practitioners engaged by the Corporation, that...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 527 APPLICANT FU RESPONDENT IX The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. The applicant purchased a [puppy] from the respondent for $2,500.00 which sadly became ill, and was put down by her vet, within 2 weeks of purchase. 2. The applicant filed a claim seeking a refund for the purchase price of the puppy ($2,500) pl...
...TPT FORESTS LIMITED v CRAIG PENFOLD [2021] NZEmpC 105 [8 July 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 105 EMPC 334/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for search order AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for access to court documents by The China Navigation Company PTE Ltd BETWEEN TPT FORESTS LIMITED First Applicant AND TPT GROUP LTD Second Ap...
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2020-100-006 BETWEEN JUNG SOOK GWAK & JOSEPHINE YEON JU KIM Claimants AND YAN SUN First Respondent (Removed) AND ALASTAIR COUPER Second Respondent AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Third Respondent (Removed) AND LAI FOOK CHOY Fourth Respondent PROCEDURAL ORDER 11 (Leave application by claimants) Dated 8 June 2023 2 Introduction [1] There was a telephone conference convened on this claim...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 273 APPLICANT XN RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The hearing is dismissed. Reasons 1. XN asked C Ltd to service his vehicle. Some weeks later he was cleaning the car and found a broken part of the glove box, a hole near the back, on the right-hand side. He also found signs of glue around the hole. XN rec...