Search Results

1. LG v G Ltd [2024] NZDT 411 (28 May 2024) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...of [LG] viewing.” 2. The boat arrived later than originally anticipated. LG viewed the boat with his partner on 19 December 2023 and decided that it was not what they wanted. He advised OG in an email that he would not purchase the boat and requested a refund. OG said the deposit was non-refundable. LG claimed to be refunded his deposit. 3. The issues to be determined to resolve the claim are: (a) Was LG entitled to cancel the contract? (b) If so, is LG entitled to be refunded...

2. LCRO 163/2020 DM v TN and EX (9 April 2021) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...DM's leave application with the Authority in July 20XX. 4 [14] The Complaints Service wrote to Mr DM and informed him that Ms Z had ceased practice as a lawyer in 20XX, and that there was “no jurisdiction in respect to her.” It requested further information from Mr DM about his dealings with Messrs TN and EX, which Mr DM provided. Standard Committee processes [15] Mr DM’s complaint was initially assessed as being suitable for the Complaints Service’s Early Res...

3. [2015] NZEmpC 85 Agus Riyanto & 43 others v Dong Nam Company Ltd interlocutory [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...wages have been properly paid. [3] On 13 February 2015, the plaintiffs served on the defendant a notice requiring disclosure under reg 42 of the Employment Court Regulations 2000 (the Regulations). Disclosure of 19 categories of documents were requested. Only six of those categories are now in issue, the earlier categories having been dealt with by way of a verification order. The outstanding categories were described in this way: The charter agreement 14. All agreements, cont...

4. BF v QT [2023] NZDT 600 (30 October 2023) [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...paid by BF for the pool liner. Were the services provided with reasonable care and skill? 8. BF said initially Mr T’s maintenance of the pool was good, but it became very hard to get him to the property to replace the pool liner, or get much information from him about why. She said the liner was not ordered by him until July 2022, despite him quoting them and them accepting his quote in March 2022. BF said they paid $1,100.00 deposit for the liner in July 2022. CI0301_CIV_DCD...

5. LCRO 91/2017 DV v LS and HS (19 December 2018) [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...proceedings had not been served within the time-out period, a judge or a Registrar had the discretion to extend the time for serving them for a further six months. [34] On 6 November 2012, Mr J wrote to the Registrar at the District Court and requested an enlargement of the time within which to serve the negligence proceedings on the [City] Council. [35] That request was granted. [36] It was established at about this time by either Mr J or Mr E, that the WHT proceedings had been...

6. AM Ltd v ZN and ZNZ [2014] NZDT 575 (30 May 2014) [pdf, 32 KB]

   ...Date of Order: 30 May 2014 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that AM Ltd is to pay the sum of $8,212.15 directly to ZN and ZNZ on or before 21 June 2014; and the applicant’s claim is dismissed. Facts [1] ZN and ZNZ engaged AM Ltd (‘AM Ltd’) to prepare a preliminary design for a new house for their family. A written contract was signed on 5 September 2013 and a detailed design brief completed by the respo...

7. Wai 2180 Taihape inquiry newsletter 6 Feb 2018 [pdf, 806 KB]

   ...February – Huitanguru 2018 2 During the early planning of the hearing phase, the hearing programme was set out in geographical sequence to give shape to the kaupapa of each hearing. Each week would be loosely formed around kaupapa from within, or related to, the northern, central and southern blocks in the inquiry district, respectively. From 2-6 October 2017, the third hearing week was held at the Taihape Area School (Huia Street, Taiha...

8. IX Group Ltd v UU Ltd [2020] NZDT 1375 (8 October 2020) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...OADN Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: IX Group Limited is to pay OADN Limited $5,459.63 by Friday 30 October 2020. IX Group Limited’s claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. IX Group Limited (IX) engaged OADN to provide an NTV platform for streaming services. IX say there were problems with the platform and they did all the adjustments and recommendations but there were still issues. They are claiming $14,999.51 being $1,725.00 (the amount paid to OADN for the first mont...

9. CO v B Ltd & Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 718 (16 September 2024) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...scratches and marks on the van for which photographic evidence has been provided (items (c) – (i) above) as category B. I am satisfied from the photos that these scratches and dents were not properly disclosed to CO when he specifically asked for information on any dents and scratches, and amounted to a misrepresentation. 9. Q Ltd argues that the scratches and dents in category B should be considered wear and tear. However, while it is possible that they may be considered as such if...

10. Form 23D Fixed Fees A-C [pdf, 331 KB]

    Templates V15 – July 2018 page 1 07/18 form 23d Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules A, B & C: Police Prosecutions Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court type District Court High Court Court location Details of...