12870 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 654 APPLICANT BS APPLICANT WQ RESPONDENT K Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT T Ltd THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT N District Council THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. K Ltd and T Ltd are to pay BS and WQ $8,000.00 on or before the 15 November 2023. 2. The claim against N District Coun...
...the Christmas break Privacy Guidelines for providers of Justice services Special duty lawyer arrangements for the holiday period When the Aided Person in Waitangi Tribunal Proceedings Dies Criminal legal aid assignments published Where to send Civil Applications Paternity cases Cut-off date for invoices reminder Update on Legal Aid Services response to COVID-19 (8 October 2020) Criminal Case Assignment Christmas and New Year availability 0800 2 LEGAL AID Update Alert Level 1 - Update on Legal S...
...applications and other documentation [8] None of the waiver applicants is legally represented and their supporting documentation is somewhat reflective of that. Nevertheless, looking beyond form, I am in a position to consider the substance of their claimed basis for joining the appeals. [9] All of the waiver applicants note that they are party to the Subdivision Appeal and say that they seek to be involved in the Hanan and Banco appeals given that the issues are related. Judith Han...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 233 APPLICANT BL APPLICANT QH RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Limited is to pay QH and BL the sum of $3,000.00 on or before 12 July 2023. Reasons: 1. BL and QH engaged T Ltd to provide styling for their wedding. This included flowers, decorations, tableware, a Mandap, and seating. The price, i
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 168 APPLICANT WT t/a HC RESPONDENT DE Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons Background 1. WT is a garment engineer and tutor. WT trades as HC. 2. DE Ltd is a quilting and patchwork shop located on [Road]. 3. In 2019 / 20 WT began operating a clothing repair and alterations business from part of DE...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1501 APPLICANT KA RESPONDENT CU Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT ZX THIRD RESPONDENT GY The Tribunal hereby orders: ZX and GY, jointly and severally, are to pay the sum of $2,547.26 to KA on or before Thursday 1 August 2019. Reasons: 1. KA purchased her property at [property A] in late 200...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 417 APPLICANT MI RESPONDENT JN The Tribunal orders: JN is to pay MI $850.00 on or before Thursday 14 September 2023. Reasons: 1. Lindsay Harbour claims that on 21 November 2022 she purchased a second hand kitchen advertised for $850.00 from JN. This comprised the bench and associated componentry including 2 marble...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 678 APPLICANT P Ltd RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 22 August 2023, EC, the Director of P Ltd bought on behalf of his company (P Ltd) a damaged car at auction from NB on an ‘as is where is’ basis, after it had been written off by the owner’s insurer, XX. There was no dispute that...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 148 APPLICANT LM RESPONDENT HD Ltd The Tribunal orders: HD Ltd is to pay LM $200.00 by 22 August 2022. Reasons 1. NM and LM stayed at the HD Hotel in [location redacted] for one night on 17 January 2022. They checked out early (around 7.30am) on 18 January. 2. They paid $105.00 for the accommodation by cr...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 526 APPLICANT J Ltd RESPONDENT IN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. J Ltd brings a claim against IN on the basis that: a. IN was a customer of X Ltd. b. IN owed X Ltd $3,232.72 as at 16 April 2020. c. The terms of IN’s contract with X Ltd allowed X Ltd to transfer a debt to a third party. d. X...