Search Results

1. Gilford v Accident Compensation Corporation [2016] NZACA 03 [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...expressly say so, its effect was restricted to declining cover for the mental consequences of the 1985 injury. Mr Guilford continued to obtain coverage for the physical consequences of that accident. The Corporation had in fact treated Dr Eyers’ request as a new claim, so the original coverage of the accident was unaffected. [7] Mr Guilford filed an application for review of the 22 August 1997 decision many years later, on 12 October 2015. The Corporation accepts he had not bee...

2. WHT Annual Report 2021 [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...Tribunal for the period commencing 1 July 2020 and ending on 30 June 2021. The Tribunal is a well performing judicial body producing high quality and timely decisions and orders. The financial year saw a small increase in the number of new claims commenced compared with the previous financial year and a relatively large increase in the number of claims finalised. The number of claims filed remains modest, as we are now well past the peak of ‘leaky home’ building in this cou...

3. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Hamilton [2012] NZHRRT 24 [pdf, 120 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2012] NZHRRT 24 Reference No. HRRT 033/2011 IN THE MATTER OF A CLAIM UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND DAVID HAMILTON DEFENDANT AT ASHBURTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms W Gilchrist, Member Hon K Shirley, Member COUNSEL: Ms KT Dalziel for Director of Human Rights Proceedings Mr D Hamilton in person DATE OF HEARING: 16 a...

4. Enforcement of Access Direction (s104) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...agency has not complied with the access direction or has not complied in full. The agency has not lodged an appeal within 20 working days from the date of the notice given to the parties under section 91(7) of the Privacy Act 2020. When to use this form Use this form when applying for an order requiring the agency to comply with the access direction under section 104 of the Privacy Act 2020. Completing this form • Print clearly in CAPITALS. Use a black pen or blue pen when completi...

5. Dennett v Te Tumu Paeroa - Rotohokahoka D North 2A (2017) 178 Waiariki MB 24 (178 WAR 24) [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...5038, Wellington 6140, greg.shaw@tetumupaeroa.co.nz christine.reuhman@tetumupaeroa.co.nz mailto:graeme27@xtra.co.nz mailto:greg.shaw@tetumupaeroa.co.nz mailto:christine.reuhman@tetumupaeroa.co.nz 178 Waiariki MB 25 Introduction [1] The applicants seek an award for the costs incurred in pursuing these proceedings against Te Tumu Paeroa. Although an agreement was reached prior to the Court hearing, the applicants claim that the costs they incurred should be met by the Māori...

6. [2012] NZEmpC 4 Haig v Edgewater Developers Ltd and Others [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 4 [20 January 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 4 ARC 30/10 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF interlocutory applications BETWEEN ROBERT HAIG Plaintiff AND EDGEWATER DEVELOPERS LIMITED First Defendant AND CARRINGTON FARMS LIMITED Second Defendant AND PH II INCORPORATED Third Defendant Hearing: 10 September 2010 (i...

7. VJ & VL v AE LCRO 88 / 2012 (14 May 2013) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...that amount. [7] The narration of her invoice is as follows: My fee for professional attendances in respect of receiving charges, including attendances on yourselves and Police, attending to execution of Official Information & Privacy Act forms for request of disclosure of Police file, serving same on Police, all attendances at Auckland District Court for bail and resolution of charges, reporting to you and to all incidental matters thereto. [8] The timesheet provided by the...

8. [2013] NZEmpC 9 Gini v Strugess [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...employer regardless of any notion of labelling and limitation of liability” and thirdly, that there was “a compelling argument for lifting the corporate veil.” The strike out determination [5] Counsel for the defendant, Mr Cleary, made application to the Authority to have the claims against Ms Sturgess dismissed on the grounds that there was no employment relationship between her and Ms Gini. In a determination 3 dated 23 February 2011, the Authority dismissed Mr Cleary�€...

9. [2023] NZEmpC 195 PIC Insurance Brokers Ltd v Pepper [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...LIMITED v LEILANI MAREE PEPPER [2023] NZEmpC 195 [9 November 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 195 EMPC 278/2023 IN THE MATTER OF an application for pre-commencement discovery BETWEEN P.I.C. INSURANCE BROKERS LIMITED Applicant AND LEILANI MAREE PEPPER First Respondent AND GEOFFREY VICTOR COOPER Second Respondent AND OCEANIA INSU...

10. KO v TC [2023] NZDT 713 (17 December 2023) [pdf, 175 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 713 APPLICANT KO RESPONDENT TC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. KO purchased goods through [online] marketplace from TC. KO arranged a courier pick-up of the goods but says only some of the purchased goods were in the package TC provided to the courier. 2. KO says he is entitled to a refund of $160....