Search Results

1. [2014] NZEmpC 54 Hamon v Coromandel Independent Living Trust [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...October 2007 for a fixed term of one year. [2] Differences arose between Ms Hamon and CILT from the commencement of her employment. On 21 January 2008, Ms Hamon resigned. She alleged that she had been constructively dismissed. She commenced a claim in the Employment Relations Authority. She sought reimbursement of lost remuneration for the balance of her fixed term employment, compensation and a penalty. In a determination dated 10 March 2009 1 the Authority dismisse...

2. Fehling v Ministry of Health [2017] NZHRRT 31 [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...(enclosed) I was informed that the enrolement was terminated on 7/1/15 due to the data-matching limit above, and that I cannot receive subsidised treatment; A visit on 7/5/15 showed that I was not enroled – I had not been informed previously, but had requested official info from MoH whether it had NHI number and personal details on 1/4/15 … MoH admitted to have both (enclosed). 4. An “assurance” by DHBs/PHOs Ms Tymons followed that computer data are safe; But she was evasive abou...

3. Pryazhnikov v New Zealand Police [2024] NZHRRT 49 [pdf, 471 KB]

   ...his right to live in Australia was linked to his employment. [2] On 25 June 2018, Mr Pryazhnikov was the subject of a family harm complaint made to the New Zealand Police (Police). On 9 July 2018, Mr Pryazhnikov made an information privacy request about that complaint. [3] On 30 July 2018, Police refused his request in its entirety. Mr Pryazhnikov claims that refusal, as well as other actions of Police, have interfered with his privacy. BACKGROUND [4] In mid-2018, Mr Pryazh...

4. [2009] NZEmpC AC 16A/09 Peterson & Anor v B Engineering Ltd & Anor [pdf, 87 KB]

   ...Browne’s husband and, therefore, Carl Peterson’s son- in-law and Jake Peterson’s brother-in-law. [2] Nevertheless, this is employment litigation founded on employment agreements and other common law obligations arising out of that form of relationship. At its heart are portable sawmills and the ownership of the intellectual property in their designs. Despite prosecuting and defending this challenge without professional representation as would undoubtedly have assist...

5. KM v TE [2021] NZDT 1619 (30 July 2021) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...KM entitled to a remedy and, if so, is the amount claimed proved and reasonable? Is KM owed a further 20 percent commission on [Property 3]? If so, how much is she owed? 8. The law of contract applies. Once a legally enforceable contract is formed, the parties are bound by the terms they have agreed to, and those terms are enforceable by one party against the other. This means that if one party breaches a term of the contract, the other party may seek a remedy. A legally enforceab...

6. Holden & Anor as Trustees of the Estate of Bruce Morris v Hanns [2010] NZWHT Wellington 23 [pdf, 432 KB]

   ...it will need to be properly rebuilt to avoid future damage. Inter-Storey Sill [70] The assessor showed that the inter-storey sill has not been constructed as designed. There is a steel beam across the elevation and timber framing beam forming a lintel for the living room joinery. The timber beam is heavily decayed. [71] Decay was found on the north elevation to the right of the entrance door showing decay to the framing and corrosion to the fixing plate. Removal of...

7. Application for contempt enforcement proceedings [pdf, 496 KB]

   When should I use this form? This form lets you apply for a court order against the judgment debtor where they have the means to pay the judgment debt but are refusing to do so. Use this form if all the following apply: • you are the judgment creditor • the money owed in a judgment or court order has not been paid • you can show that the judgment debtor has the means to pay the debt but is refusing to do so. For example, a financial statement or financial assessment has been complet...

8. NE v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claims Process) [2025] NZACC 023 (4 February 2025) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...allocated to determine those reviews, and they were scheduled for hearing at a rate of one hearing per week, to around July 2023. [4] In September 2022, after the Reviewer had dismissed a number of reviews by the appellant, she began to make requests for a change of Reviewer, alleging that the allocated Reviewer was biased against her. From 21 September 2022, the Reviewer considered and declined each of these requests, determining that the grounds for recusal were not met. [5]...

9. Prasad v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 33 (19 March 2014) [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...the adviser to assist with a new application. Immigration New Zealand raised a concern that his previous application was misleading and was not prepared to grant the application for that reason. [3] The adviser lodged another three applications or requests for visas for the complainant, and never addressed Immigration New Zealand’s concern, despite the concern being pointed out repeatedly. [4] The adviser says she did not address Immigration New Zealand’s concern, as the complainant...

10. TH v BG Ltd [2019] NZDT 1515 (12 August 2019) [pdf, 202 KB]

    ...failed to comply with all laws and legal requirements. 7. DR and his witness [Witness 1] of [Structural engineering company 2] both expressed the view that it was a “grey area” whether consent was needed. Even if that is so, DR should have informed TH that it was a grey area whether he could legally do the work without a building consent. The reason he gave for not informing her was that he assumed she already knew, because she had “done all her homework”. He claimed that she ha...