13020 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1409 APPLICANT KD RESPONDENT SS The Tribunal orders: KD’s claim against SS is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 11 September 2020, KD emailed a notice that he wanted to build a fence between his property and the neighbouring properties. He emailed a fencing notice to SS and NS (the respondents) notifying them of his int...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 213 APPLICANT ME RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1) On 5 September 2022 the applicant travelled on flight bookings made with the respondent from [City A] to [City B] with the intention of connecting with an ongoing flight to [International City 1]. The applicant says that his...
...“position in a clear and forthright manner”. [26] Concerning Mrs AR’s request for directions, the Committee explained that its role was to consider and determine complaints about a lawyer’s conduct, “not to provide legal advice” as requested by Mrs AR. 5 Application for review [27] Mrs AR filed her application for review with this Office on 3 May 2018. She seeks (a) a “reprimand” for Mrs NM in respect of [Mrs NM’s] “unprofessional dealings” carrying...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1678 APPLICANT OH RESPONDENT RI Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: [1] OH rented a three-bedroom apartment managed by RI Ltd (RI) for one week at a cost of $3,030.00. After checking in to the apartment, he discovered that one of the bedrooms had no window. OH delayed raising the is...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 12 APPLICANT QH RESPONDENT TU Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT LQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. QH is claiming for a refund of an amount charged by TU Ltd for towing her vehicle from [Address 1] to their yard in [Address 2]. 2. QH states she parked in a parking are...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 71 APPLICANT DE APPLICANT XE RESPONDENT SC The Tribunal orders: SC is to pay XE and DE $1,000.00 by 9 February 2024. Background 1. DE and XE purchased a [vehicle] that SC had listed for sale on Trade Me. 2. The listing described the vehicle as “Good body, tyres and interior. Not running”. 3. The purchase price was $...
...care agreements in the best interests of their children. • FDR Preparation for Mediation: a service to which people may be referred to, helping people manage their feelings and focus on their children for effective participation in FDR. Most CoCA applicants to the Family Court are required2 to attend PTS and attempt to resolve their disputes via FDR before court entry. FLAS, FDR, and Preparation for Mediation are free for those who meet the income eligibility threshold. Information...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 104 APPLICANT IC RESPONDENT CH The Tribunal orders: CH is to make available, on or before 21 October 2022, for packing and collection by a courier/transport company of IC’s choice, the [brand] crystal items that were the subject of the Trade Me auction won by IC on 7 November 2021; and On the confirmation of a...
...property at [address 1], and NQ is her partner. QG and NC own [address 2]. These properties share an adjoining boundary. This matter involves a claim filed by SS and NQ against all three respondents, and a counterclaim filed by QG and NC against the applicants, relating to the following events. 2. During 2021 a fence was erected on the shared boundary between [address 1] and [address 2]. QG and NC put forward the fencing proposal and engaged E Ltd to erect the fence. In June 202...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 6 APPLICANT BD RESPONDENT SL The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. The Breed Certificate transfer should be issued to SL for [Horse] as if he had been paid for in full. Reasons 1. In October 2022, SL purchased a colt named [Horse] for $6,000.00 from BD. The sum of $500.00 was to be paid after delivery...