Search Results

1. NI & QI v SB [2024] NZDT 60 (14 February 2024) [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...of subrogation”. This means an insurer has the right to pursue a third party that the insurer believes caused the loss to its client (the insured) car. As insurer does this to recover amounts it has paid its client. 3. In this case the amount claimed by N Ltd against SB is $10,299.15. 4. The issues to be decided by the Tribunal are: a. Is SB liable in negligence for the damage to QI’s car? b. Is the amount claimed by N Ltd substantiated? Is SB liable in negligence f...

2. Memorandum of Counsel for Guardians of the Bays Incorporated (dated 16 March 2018) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...section 274 parties, in their own right. This memorandum follows Wellington International Airport Limited’s (WIAL) request for an adjournment of its proceedings to a reporting date of 28 September 2018 (to allow WIAL to make progress with its application to the Director General of Civil Aviation (Director) for approval of its proposed Runway Safety Area Extension (RESA)), and the Court’s direction of 1 March that: Any party wishing to comment on the requested adjournment and/o...

3. [2025] NZIACDT 04 EI v Liu (14 January 2025) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...WeChat text by ZA (the agent) who claimed to represent employers needing workers for recovery work following floods. Mr Liu replied quoting a fee of $800 for each application. [6] Mr Liu then provided the agent with a link to a questionnaire and requested that each applicant fill in their personal information. The complainant completed the questionnaire on 7 March 2023. [7] RM, an associate of the agent, provided a file of supporting documents concerning the complainant to Mr...

4. [2025] NZIACDT 02 TX v Liu (13 January 2025) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...WeChat text by ZA (the agent) who claimed to represent employers needing workers for recovery work following floods. Mr Liu replied quoting a fee of $800 for each application. [6] Mr Liu then provided the agent with a link to a questionnaire and requested that each applicant fill in their personal information. The complainant completed the questionnaire on 5 March 2023. [7] RM, an associate of the agent, provided a file of supporting documents concerning the complainant to Mr...

5. [2025] NZIACDT 03 IX v Liu (14 January 2025) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...WeChat text by ZA (the agent) who claimed to represent employers needing workers for recovery work following floods. Mr Liu replied quoting a fee of $800 for each application. [6] Mr Liu then provided the agent with a link to a questionnaire and requested that each applicant fill in their personal information. The complainant completed the questionnaire on 6 March 2023. [7] RM, an associate of the agent, provided a file of supporting documents concerning the complainant to Mr...

6. NOP TUV v MBIE [2014] NZHRRT 16 [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...steps had been taken to ensure that having regard to the purpose for which the information was proposed to be used, the information was accurate, up to date, complete, relevant and not misleading. [4] The secondary issue is whether, in a subsequent request by the plaintiffs for access to personal information held by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, the Ministry had proper grounds for withholding certain information under s 27(1)(c) of the Privacy Act 1993. The Minist...

7. AI v Secretary for Justice 10 August 2012 NZRA 000012 [pdf, 83 KB]

   REVIEW AUTHORITY NEW ZEALAND 2012 NZRA 000012 Applicant AI Respondent Secretary for Justice Date of Decision: 10 August 2012 ________________________________________________________________ DECISION ________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION 1. On the 17th 2. The Secretary communicated advice of that decision to the applicant by letter dated 25 May 2012. May 2012 The Secretary for Justice (‘the Secretary�...

8. BO v YL [2015] NZDT 773 (13 April 2015) [pdf, 16 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2015] NZDT 773 BETWEEN BO APPLICANT AND YL RESPONDENT AND YLY LIMITED SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 13 April 2015 Referee: Referee Smallholme ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that YL, a division of YLY Limited, is to pay BO the sum of $2,127.70 with payment to be made by 5 pm on Friday 27 April 2015. Reasons [1] BO claims $2,527.70 from his insurer, YL (a division o...

9. KW v WB LCRO 118 / 2010 (20 April 2012) [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...statement “was incorrect as distributions of funds agreed to by the parties was the responsibility of [the Practitioner’s firm]”. He continued that the Practitioner did not know that he had engaged the other lawyer prior to when that lawyer requested the transfer of the funds. [13] The Applicant was unable to comment on Rule 10.2 but thought it should be changed if it meant that lawyers could transfer money from one firm to another for a client without reference to the clie...

10. [2019] NZEmpC 27 Barbara Buckett & Assoc t/a Buckett Law v Farani [pdf, 206 KB]

    ...B Buckett, counsel for plaintiff Judgment: 13 March 2019 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [Application for substituted service] [1] This matter commenced life in the Employment Relations Authority as a claim against an ex-employee for breach of the employment agreement, the statutory duty of good faith, and breach of the implied term of fidelity. The Authority dismissed the plaintiff’s claim finding that there was no employment relationsh...