Search Results

1. H Ltd v T Ltd & Ors [2023] NZDT 700 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...XX The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. H Ltd were contracted by NX to build a house. NX contracted separately with B Ltd for the house plans. H Ltd contracted T Ltd for the site survey and layout. 2. When requested to start works, T Ltd requested plans from B Ltd to enable them to set out the site. H Ltd then started building set out work. However, as the project progressed, they realised there had been an error as the measurements on the plans di...

2. LB v MX & BJ Ltd [2024] NZDT 281 (22 February 2024) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...of mistake would have been made in this circumstance. 10. Therefore, it is not necessary to consider the second issue and the claim is dismissed. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 22 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

3. DE & XE v SC [2024] NZDT 71 (15 January 2024) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...$1,000.00 that they are claiming. 20. The claim is proven. 21. DE and XE remain the owners of the vehicle and they may dispose of it as they see fit. Referee: Nicholas Blake Date: 15 January 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

4. EM & MM v QQ & Ors [2024] NZDT 675 (11 July 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...section from the respondents, QQ and SS. The applicants claim that the respondents were in breach of two provisions of the sale and purchase agreement, and claim compensation for their resulting losses. [2] The agreement was in the standard [redacted] form. The clauses that the applicants claimed were breached by the respondents were cll 6.1 and 7.1. These state, so far as is relevant: 6.1 The vendor shall not be bound to point out the boundaries of the property except that on the sa...

5. KT v EG [2024] NZDT 572 (28 May 2024) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...damages for the failure to return the bond immediately. Conclusion 11. For these reasons EG is to pay KT the sum of $158.00 by the date stated in the order. Referee: K Rendall Date: 28 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

6. BQ v HM [2025] NZDT 225 (15 June 2025) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...transmission) of the [vehicle]. The claim must be dismissed because Ms BQ has not proved her claim. 8. I am not required to consider the remaining issues. C Murphy Disputes Tribunal Referee 15 June 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

7. BE v TD Ltd [2023] NZDT 317 (25 July 2023) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...recommended that the rack be replaced. B Ltd replaced the rack with a secondhand one in August, and TD Ltd covered the cost involved. [4] After this, the vehicle drove better, but there was still a knock present. BE continued to drive the car, her only form of transport, to work. In November 2022, when driving to [Town], she drove for the first time over a particularly bumpy road at 100 kph. The rack made excessive noise, and seemed to pull or shake the steering wheel. BE felt unsafe....

8. File other applications

   ...declining removal.  The Authority is not required to stay the matter before it until your application is determined by the Court. Filing fee The filing fee must be paid before or at the time of filing the application. Documents You should file: Form 3: application for special leave a copy of the determination declining removal an affidavit in support Find Form 3 application for special leave, template for an affidavit in support and the fee information on our forms and fees pag...

   Located in:

   1. Employment Court >
   2. Apply to the Employment Court >
   3. File a challenge

9. HD v NU [2023] NZDT 118 (9 March 2023) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...was found they were fully blocked with tree roots and sludge and could only be replaced. The system was old and could now only be replaced with a new compliant system. 3. HD claimed for the cost to replace the septic tank system and the work performed to investigate the fault. 4. The issues to resolve the claim are: (a) Was the wastewater system in reasonable working order? (b) What loss can HD prove she is entitled to be compensated for? Does the proposed reinstatement pl...

10. DB Ltd v UC [2024] NZDT 449 (7 May 2024) [pdf, 222 KB]

    ...email account which she was entitled to use for school purposes, and she held a position of responsibility for organising the trip to [town]. Was a booking for accommodation made? 8. This is just another way to ask whether a contract was formed between the Motel and UC for accommodation on the nights of 6 and 7 October 2023. I find that there was for the following reasons: a. There were discussions about possible accommodation on 27 November 2022, including discussions abou...