12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 6 APPLICANT BD RESPONDENT SL The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. The Breed Certificate transfer should be issued to SL for [Horse] as if he had been paid for in full. Reasons 1. In October 2022, SL purchased a colt named [Horse] for $6,000.00 from BD. The sum of $500.00 was to be paid after delivery...
...REGISTRY [2014] NZEmpC 87 [9 June 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND REGISTRY [2014] NZEmpC 87 ARC 56/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for leave to amend statement of claim BETWEEN SHIRLEY ANNE MACDONALD Plaintiff AND WHALE PUMPS LIMITED T/A DENBY CATERERS Defendant Hearing: On the memoranda, affidavits and submissions of t...
...force at the time the actions subject to this claim were taken. BACKGROUND Filing of claim and response [8] The alleged privacy breaches largely relate to actions by Police in 2011 and the earlier part of 2012. Ms Sax complains that personal information held by Police was inaccurate and that the failure of Police to correct that information and to publish it breached Information Privacy Principles (IPPs) 2 to 11. [9] The Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) investigated a s...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2011] NZDT 169 BETWEEN ADH APPLICANT AND ZWS Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 28 June 2011 Referee: Referee Davidson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Applicant’s claim is dismissed. Pursuant to s 11(2)(b) of the Disputes Tribunals Act 1988 the Applicant, ADH, must pay the Respondent, ZWS Limited, $625.00 (incl GST) within 7 days of the date of this Order....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 502 APPLICANT NP RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. NP had a collision in her car, a [vehicle], in December 2023. NP had insured her car with B Ltd, who arranged for the repairs to be done. NP was due to collect her car after it had been repaired on 17 January 2024, but B Ltd advised her the rep...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1493 APPLICANT [City] Council RESPONDENT HL The Tribunal hereby orders: HL is to pay [City] Council the sum of $5,976.93 within 28 days of the date of this order. Reasons: 1. In the early hours of 19 August 2018 HL was driving his vehicle on [Street] [City] when he lost control of his vehicle and hit a traffic light pole located a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1603 APPLICANT XI RESPONDENT N Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. 1. In August 2016, XI had a pacemaker implanted in China, supplied by N Ltd China. In June - August 2020, she experienced health issues while she was visiting New Zealand (NZ). The decision was...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 212 APPLICANT NX RESPONDENT P Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] NX claims compensation of $375.00 from P Ltd, represented by QD and TD, managers, in its capacity as a manufacturer for what he considers is a breach of a consumer guarantee relating to a [car radio unit]. P Ltd denies liability....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 473 APPLICANT D Ltd RESPONDENT AB APPLICANT'S INSURER X Ltd The Tribunal orders: AB is to pay the sum of $30,000.00 to X Ltd on or before Friday 6 October 2023. Reasons: 1. On 5 May 2022, there was a collision between D Ltd’s [vehicle 1], driven by its director BM, and a [vehicle 2]. Both vehicles were usi...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 206 APPLICANT TU RESPONDENT CE SECOND RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim against CE is dismissed. 2. D Limited is to pay $26,081.92 to TU by 1 July 2023. 3. Immediately following payment of the $26,081.92, D Ltd will own the solar panels it supplied to TU and by arrangement m...