12531 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 410 APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In March 2023, NN purchased a [electric bike] from C Ltd in [City]. NN says the assurance from sales staff that the bike was also able to charge his phone was a critical factor in his purchase. NN quickly discovered however...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 326 APPLICANT SO RESPONDENT GU The Tribunal orders: GU is to pay SO the sum of $150.00 within 28 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. On 3 August 2022, the parties entered into a contract for the sale and purchase of a property at [Town] with a settlement date on 30 September 2022....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 80 APPLICANT AA RESPONDENT BB The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In December 2016, AA and her adult son (BB) came to New Zealand. This is a very sad family dispute between a mother and her only child concerning items purchased for him and her son’s counterclaim ag...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 275 APPLICANT WU RESPONDENT QW The Tribunal orders: 1. QW is to pay WU $902.25 on or before 30 May 2024. 2. Payment is to be made by way of direct credit to account number [account number]. Reasons: 1. WU purchased a steer (a castrated bull) from QW for $600.00 through a local [online] page. Sometime after the steer was delivered...
Gisborne District Council v Aratu Forests Limited IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 190 IN THE MATTER OF an application under s 314 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN GISBORNE DISTRICT COUNCIL (ENV-2024-AKL-131) Applicant AND ARATU FORESTS LIMITED First Respondent AND CASSANDRA ROSE CROWLEY Second Respondent AND MAUI TE KOTUKU TANGOHAU Third Respondent AND MATTHEW DAVIS WAK...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 637 APPLICANT EI RESPONDENT JM Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. In November 2022, EI started his [truck], when he put his foot on the accelerator, water was sucked through the air filter into the engine resulting in the engine being damaged. 2. EI seeks $30,000.00 from his insurance compan...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 27 APPLICANT BW RESPONDENT NK The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In July 2023, BW agreed to purchase a [Car], from NK through [Website] for $4,700.00. In September 2023, BW contacted NK asking for a refund because the car had significant mechanical problems. 2. BW says the condition of the car has be...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 246 APPLICANT AX and KX RESPONDENT WB The Tribunal orders: 1. WB is to pay to AX and KX the sum of $637.23 on or before 12 May 2023. Reasons 1. AX and KX undertook fence repairs on their boundary with WB. They filed a claim seeking to be compensated for the cost of the repairs, and collection costs. The cla...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2017] NZDT 1456 APPLICANT SN RESPONDENT BN Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: BN Limited is to pay the sum of $1804.35 to SN on or before Thursday 20 July 2017. Reasons: 1. In March 2016, Mr N’s old ensuite vanity unit was replaced with a new vanity under his insurance policy with BN Limited. By the end of the year...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 345 APPLICANT UD RESPONDENT XI Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. UD bought a new build home from XI Ltd in September 2009. UD says the shower liner in the ensuite shower has now detached from the wall. He seeks an order that XI Ltd is liable to pay him $6,000.00, which he says is the cost to fix the sh...